Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check boxes not correct in "Log Blocks" tab #393

Closed
krichardsson opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Check boxes not correct in "Log Blocks" tab #393

krichardsson opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@krichardsson
Copy link
Contributor

There are a couple of reports of checkboxes not working in the Log Blocks tab.

Report 1:
Cfclient
Cfclient version: 2020.2
System: darwin
Python: 3.7.3
Qt: 5.14.1
PyQt: 5.14.1

The check boxes appear, but under the "Contents" column

Report 2:
https://forum.bitcraze.io/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4196
Linux Mint 19.3, Linux 5.3.0-40-generic #32~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 3 14:05:59 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
python3-pyqt5 5.10.1+dfsg- amd64 Python 3 bindings for Qt5

No check boxes visible
Also reports errors when mouse over the (non-existing) checkboxes, see forum post.

@knmcguire
Copy link
Contributor

Update on the forum. The update to Linux Mint 20 seems to correct the problem.

@krichardsson
Copy link
Contributor Author

We should probably look at refactoring the UI for this functionality, checkboxes feel slightly weird. Maybe we can do something else?

@krichardsson
Copy link
Contributor Author

krichardsson commented Aug 18, 2020

We are now telling QT to render the UI using its own functions and not using objects in the underlying OS. This should solve this issue. See #432

@krichardsson krichardsson added this to the next-release milestone Aug 18, 2020
krichardsson added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants