Remove unused DB method, add tests for pageSpeedCheckModule #1144
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: The PR aims to enhance code maintainability and test coverage by removing an unused DB method and adding comprehensive tests for the
pageSpeedCheckModule. - Key components modified:
Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js: Removal of an unused import and method call.Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js: Removal of the unusedgetPageSpeedChecksmethod.Server/tests/db/pageSpeedCheckModule.test.js: Addition of unit tests forcreatePageSpeedCheckanddeletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorIdmethods.
- Impact assessment: The changes simplify the codebase without affecting existing functionality, improving readability and maintainability.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: No significant impact on integration points as the changes are internal to the module.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: No significant changes to the overall system design.
- Component interactions: Removal of unused method streamlines the interaction within the
pageSpeedCheckModule. - Integration points: No impact on integration points.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
File Path: Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js
- Submitted PR Code:
--- +++ @@ -111,21 +111,20 @@ editMonitor, addDemoMonitors, } from "./modules/monitorModule.js"; //**************************************** // Page Speed Checks //**************************************** import { createPageSpeedCheck, - getPageSpeedChecks, deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId, } from "./modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js"; //**************************************** // Hardware Checks //**************************************** import { createHardwareCheck } from "./modules/hardwareCheckModule.js"; //**************************************** // Checks @@ -205,21 +204,20 @@ addDemoMonitors, createCheck, getChecksCount, getChecks, getTeamChecks, deleteChecks, deleteChecksByTeamId, updateChecksTTL, deleteMonitorsByUserId, createPageSpeedCheck, - getPageSpeedChecks, deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId, createHardwareCheck, createMaintenanceWindow, getMaintenanceWindowsByTeamId, getMaintenanceWindowById, getMaintenanceWindowsByMonitorId, deleteMaintenanceWindowById, deleteMaintenanceWindowByMonitorId, deleteMaintenanceWindowByUserId, editMaintenanceWindowById,
- Analysis:
- The removal of the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod from the import statements and the export list simplifies the code and reduces unnecessary references. - No impact on other methods or the overall functionality of the
MongoDBmodule.
- The removal of the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None required; the change is straightforward and beneficial.
File Path: Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js
- Submitted PR Code:
--- +++ @@ -19,48 +19,29 @@ }).save(); return pageSpeedCheck; } catch (error) { error.service = SERVICE_NAME; error.method = "createPageSpeedCheck"; throw error; } }; /** - * Get all PageSpeed checks for a monitor - * @async - * @param {string} monitorId - * @returns {Promise<Array<PageSpeedCheck>>} - * @throws {Error} - */ - -const getPageSpeedChecks = async (monitorId) => { - try { - const pageSpeedChecks = await PageSpeedCheck.find({ monitorId }); - return pageSpeedChecks; - } catch (error) { - error.service = SERVICE_NAME; - error.method = "getPageSpeedChecks"; - throw error; - } -}; - -/** * Delete all PageSpeed checks for a monitor * @async * @param {string} monitorId * @returns {number} * @throws {Error} */ const deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId = async (monitorId) => { try { const result = await PageSpeedCheck.deleteMany({ monitorId }); return result.deletedCount; } catch (error) { error.service = SERVICE_NAME; error.method = "deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId"; throw error; } }; -export { createPageSpeedCheck, getPageSpeedChecks, deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId }; +export { createPageSpeedCheck, deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId };
- Analysis:
- The removal of the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod and its associated import and export statements reduces code complexity. - No impact on the functionality of other methods within the module.
- The removal of the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None required; the change is straightforward and beneficial.
File Path: Server/tests/db/pageSpeedCheckModule.test.js
- Submitted PR Code:
+ import sinon from "sinon"; + import PageSpeedCheck from "../../db/models/PageSpeedCheck.js"; + import { + createPageSpeedCheck, + deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId, + } from "../../db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js"; + + const mockPageSpeedCheck = { + monitorId: "monitorId", + bestPractices: 1, + seo: 1, + performance: 1, + }; + + const mockDeletedResult = { deletedCount: 1 }; + + describe("pageSpeedCheckModule", () => { + let pageSpeedCheckSaveStub, pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub; + beforeEach(() => { + pageSpeedCheckSaveStub = sinon.stub(PageSpeedCheck.prototype, "save"); + pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub = sinon.stub(PageSpeedCheck, "deleteMany"); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + sinon.restore(); + }); + + describe("createPageSpeedCheck", () => { + it("should return a page speed check", async () => { + pageSpeedCheckSaveStub.resolves(mockPageSpeedCheck); + const pageSpeedCheck = await createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck); + expect(pageSpeedCheck).to.deep.equal(mockPageSpeedCheck); + }); + + it("should handle an error", async () => { + const err = new Error("test error"); + pageSpeedCheckSaveStub.rejects(err); + try { + await expect(createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck)); + } catch (error) { + expect(error).to.exist; + expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); + } + }); + }); + + describe("deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId", () => { + it("should return the number of deleted checks", async () => { + pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.resolves(mockDeletedResult); + const result = await deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId"); + expect(result).to.deep.equal(mockDeletedResult.deletedCount); + }); + + it("should handle an error", async () => { + const err = new Error("test error"); + pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.rejects(err); + try { + await expect(deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId")); + } catch (error) { + expect(error).to.exist; + expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); + } + }); + }); + });
- Analysis:
- The tests cover both successful and error scenarios for
createPageSpeedCheckanddeletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId. - Uses Sinon for stubbing and Mocha for assertions, ensuring thorough coverage.
- The tests cover both successful and error scenarios for
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None required; the tests are well-structured and comprehensive.
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Edge Cases in Testing: The initial review did not delve into potential edge cases for the
createPageSpeedCheckanddeletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorIdmethods. For example, what happens if themonitorIdisnullor an empty string?
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code Structure:
- The code is well-organized with clear separation of concerns.
- Modularity is maintained by keeping related functionality within the same module.
- Error Handling:
- Error handling is robust, with proper error messages and service identification.
- Tests cover both successful and error scenarios, ensuring comprehensive error handling.
- Performance Considerations:
- No apparent performance issues introduced by the changes.
- Removal of unused code improves readability and maintainability.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- None identified.
-
🟡 Warnings
- Potential Dependencies: The initial review did not consider whether any other modules or services depend on the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod. Even if the method is unused within thepageSpeedCheckModule, it might be used elsewhere in the codebase.- Potential risks: If the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod is used elsewhere, removing it could cause runtime errors. - Suggested improvements: Perform a thorough search across the codebase to ensure no other modules use this method. If found, update those modules accordingly.
- Potential risks: If the
- Potential Dependencies: The initial review did not consider whether any other modules or services depend on the
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Documentation for Removed Method: The removal of the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod should be documented in the repository's change log or release notes to inform other developers about the deprecation.
4. Security Assessment
4.1 Security Considerations
- Error Propagation: The error handling in the methods is robust, but the initial review did not discuss how these errors are propagated up the call stack and how they are handled at higher levels. This is important for ensuring that errors are logged and communicated properly to the end-user.
4.2 Vulnerability Analysis
- Potential security risks: No new security risks introduced.
- Mitigation strategies: Ensure that all layers of the application consistently handle and propagate errors. Update documentation to reflect the expected error handling behavior.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: The tests cover both successful and error scenarios for
createPageSpeedCheckanddeletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId. - Edge cases coverage: The initial review did not consider edge cases such as
nullor emptymonitorId.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
- Add Edge Case Tests:
describe("createPageSpeedCheck", () => { // Existing tests... it("should handle null monitorId", async () => { const err = new Error("monitorId is required"); pageSpeedCheckSaveStub.rejects(err); try { await createPageSpeedCheck({ monitorId: null, bestPractices: 1, seo: 1, performance: 1 }); } catch (error) { expect(error).to.exist; expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); } }); }); describe("deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId", () => { // Existing tests... it("should handle null monitorId", async () => { const err = new Error("monitorId is required"); pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.rejects(err); try { await deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId(null); } catch (error) { expect(error).to.exist; expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); } }); });
- Coverage improvements: Expand the test suite to include edge cases such as
nullor emptymonitorId, and validate the behavior for different data types and values.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Document the removal of the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod in the repository's change log or release notes. - Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure consistent naming conventions for test variables and functions.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: No significant impact on deployment.
- Key operational considerations: Ensure that all layers of the application consistently handle and propagate errors.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical Changes (P0): None
- Important Improvements (P1):
- Perform a thorough search across the codebase to ensure no other modules use the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod.
- Perform a thorough search across the codebase to ensure no other modules use the
- Suggested Enhancements (P2):
- Add comments to the new test cases.
- Ensure consistent naming conventions for test variables and functions.
- Document the removal of the
getPageSpeedChecksmethod in the repository's change log or release notes.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Continue to improve test coverage and edge case handling.
- Business capability evolution: Enhance monitoring and alerting capabilities.
- System integration impacts: Ensure consistent error handling and propagation across the application.
WalkthroughThis pull request involves the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Server/tests/db/pageSpeedCheckModule.test.js (2)
8-13: Yo dawg, let's beef up those test cases! 🍝The mock data could use some additional edge cases to make these tests more robust. Consider adding test cases for:
- Negative performance scores
- Zero scores
- Maximum possible scores (100)
- Missing optional fields
19-22: Mom's spaghetti says we should verify our stubs! 🍝While the stub setup is clean, we should add type verification to ensure the stubs are created successfully:
beforeEach(() => { pageSpeedCheckSaveStub = sinon.stub(PageSpeedCheck.prototype, "save"); pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub = sinon.stub(PageSpeedCheck, "deleteMany"); + expect(pageSpeedCheckSaveStub).to.be.a('function'); + expect(pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub).to.be.a('function'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js(0 hunks)Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js(1 hunks)Server/tests/db/pageSpeedCheckModule.test.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js (3)
47-47: Export statement properly updated, yo!
The export statement has been cleanly updated to remove the unused getPageSpeedChecks function. Straight fire! 🔥
Line range hint 1-47: Palms are sweaty but the error handling is solid!
The remaining functions have consistent error handling with proper service and method attribution. Knees weak with appreciation for this clean code! 💯
Line range hint 1-47: Verify no remaining references to the removed function
Mom's spaghetti tells me we should verify there aren't any lingering references to the removed getPageSpeedChecks function in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the function's gone without a trace - we're clean!
After sweating through comprehensive searches across the entire codebase, there's no sign of any remaining references to getPageSpeedChecks. The function's been cleaned up properly, like mom's kitchen after spaghetti night - not a single trace left behind.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to getPageSpeedChecks
# Look for direct function calls or string references
rg -i "getPageSpeedChecks"
# Look for potential destructured imports of the function
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$ getPageSpeedChecks $$$ } from "$$_"'
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search approach with context
# Search for any references to getPageSpeedChecks in JavaScript/TypeScript files
rg -t js -t ts "getPageSpeedChecks" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any imports from the module that might have included this function
rg -t js -t ts "from ['\"].*pageSpeedCheckModule['\"]" -B 1 -A 1
# Search for any potential test files that might reference this function
fd -e test.js -e spec.js -X rg "getPageSpeedChecks"
# Look for any router or controller files that might use this function
fd -e router.js -e controller.js -X rg "getPageSpeedChecks"
Length of output: 228
Server/tests/db/pageSpeedCheckModule.test.js (1)
3-6: Lose yourself in the coverage - let's verify! 🍝
Let's verify that we're testing all exported functions from the module:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the test coverage is on point like mom's spaghetti! 🍝
Looking at the exports and test coverage, we're actually in a good spot! The module exports exactly two functions (createPageSpeedCheck and deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId), and our test file has comprehensive coverage for both:
- Each function has a success case test
- Each function has an error handling test
The test structure is clean and matches the module's exports perfectly. No spaghetti code here, just clean testing!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all exported functions from pageSpeedCheckModule.js
ast-grep --pattern 'export function $FUNC' Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to catch exports
rg "export" Server/db/mongo/modules/pageSpeedCheckModule.js -A 1
# Also check the actual test file to see what we're testing
rg "test|describe|it\(" Server/tests/db/pageSpeedCheckModule.test.js
Length of output: 629
Comment on lines
+54
to
+63
| it("should handle an error", async () => { | ||
| const err = new Error("test error"); | ||
| pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.rejects(err); | ||
| try { | ||
| await expect(deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId")); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| expect(error).to.exist; | ||
| expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same spaghetti, different plate - fix this error handling! 🍝
This error handling test has the same issue as the previous one:
-try {
- await expect(deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId"));
-} catch (error) {
- expect(error).to.exist;
- expect(error).to.deep.equal(err);
-}
+await expect(deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId"))
+ .to.be.rejectedWith(Error, "test error");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| it("should handle an error", async () => { | |
| const err = new Error("test error"); | |
| pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.rejects(err); | |
| try { | |
| await expect(deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId")); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| expect(error).to.exist; | |
| expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| it("should handle an error", async () => { | |
| const err = new Error("test error"); | |
| pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.rejects(err); | |
| await expect(deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId")) | |
| .to.be.rejectedWith(Error, "test error"); | |
| }); |
Comment on lines
+35
to
+44
| it("should handle an error", async () => { | ||
| const err = new Error("test error"); | ||
| pageSpeedCheckSaveStub.rejects(err); | ||
| try { | ||
| await expect(createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck)); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| expect(error).to.exist; | ||
| expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Knees weak, arms heavy - we got an error handling issue! 🍝
The error handling test has a potential issue. The current implementation won't actually verify that the promise rejects:
-try {
- await expect(createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck));
-} catch (error) {
- expect(error).to.exist;
- expect(error).to.deep.equal(err);
-}
+await expect(createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck))
+ .to.be.rejectedWith(Error, "test error");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| it("should handle an error", async () => { | |
| const err = new Error("test error"); | |
| pageSpeedCheckSaveStub.rejects(err); | |
| try { | |
| await expect(createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck)); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| expect(error).to.exist; | |
| expect(error).to.deep.equal(err); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| it("should handle an error", async () => { | |
| const err = new Error("test error"); | |
| pageSpeedCheckSaveStub.rejects(err); | |
| await expect(createPageSpeedCheck(mockPageSpeedCheck)) | |
| .to.be.rejectedWith(Error, "test error"); | |
| }); |
Comment on lines
+48
to
+52
| it("should return the number of deleted checks", async () => { | ||
| pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.resolves(mockDeletedResult); | ||
| const result = await deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId"); | ||
| expect(result).to.deep.equal(mockDeletedResult.deletedCount); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
There's vomit on his sweater already - we're missing assertion! 🍝
We should verify that deleteMany was called with the correct parameters:
it("should return the number of deleted checks", async () => {
pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.resolves(mockDeletedResult);
const result = await deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId");
expect(result).to.deep.equal(mockDeletedResult.deletedCount);
+ expect(pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.calledWith({ monitorId: "monitorId" })).to.be.true;
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| it("should return the number of deleted checks", async () => { | |
| pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.resolves(mockDeletedResult); | |
| const result = await deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId"); | |
| expect(result).to.deep.equal(mockDeletedResult.deletedCount); | |
| }); | |
| it("should return the number of deleted checks", async () => { | |
| pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.resolves(mockDeletedResult); | |
| const result = await deletePageSpeedChecksByMonitorId("monitorId"); | |
| expect(result).to.deep.equal(mockDeletedResult.deletedCount); | |
| expect(pageSpeedCheckDeleteManyStub.calledWith({ monitorId: "monitorId" })).to.be.true; | |
| }); |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds tests for the
pageSpeedCheckDB module