Refactor - Theme #1152
Refactor - Theme #1152
Conversation
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (41)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx (2)
6-6: Add accessibility landmarks, buddy!While using
component="main"is great, consider addingaria-labelto improve screen reader context.- <Box component="main"> + <Box component="main" aria-label="Infrastructure monitoring dashboard">
4-20: Add error boundaries and loading states, you hoser!The component lacks error handling and loading states, which are crucial for a robust user experience.
Consider implementing:
- Error boundary wrapper
- Loading state while data is being fetched
- Empty state handling
Client/src/Components/HOC/withAdminCheck.jsx (1)
Line range hint
11-24: Yo, this error handling's looking kinda slim, like mom's spaghetti!While the error is being logged, there's no user feedback when the admin check fails. Consider adding a loading state and error handling UI.
const WithAdminCheck = (props) => { const navigate = useNavigate(); + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); + const [error, setError] = useState(null); useEffect(() => { + setIsLoading(true); networkService .doesSuperAdminExist() .then((response) => { if (response.data.data === true) { navigate("/login"); } + setIsLoading(false); }) .catch((error) => { logger.error(error); + setError("Failed to verify admin status"); + setIsLoading(false); }); }, [navigate]); + + if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>; + if (error) return <div>{error}</div>; return ( <WrappedComponentClient/src/Components/Heading/index.jsx (2)
4-11: Enhance the docs with an example, buddy!The documentation's looking sharp, but how about we drop in a usage example to help other devs get started quickly?
Add this to your JSDoc:
* @returns {JSX.Element} The Typography component with specified heading properties. + * + * @example + * // As an h1 heading + * <Heading component="h1">Welcome to BlueWave</Heading> + * + * // As an h2 heading + * <Heading component="h2">Current Status</Heading> */
25-28: Yo, let's not be too strict with those children props!Headings often need to handle more than just strings - think links, emphasized text, or other inline elements.
Here's a more flexible PropTypes definition:
Heading.propTypes = { component: PropTypes.oneOf(["h1", "h2", "h3"]).isRequired, - children: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + children: PropTypes.node.isRequired, };Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/CurrentMonitoring/index.jsx (1)
2-2: Eh, let's keep our imports consistent, buddy!The Heading import uses destructuring while other imports don't. For consistency with the rest of the file, consider changing it to:
-import { Heading } from "../../../../Components/Heading"; +import Heading from "../../../../Components/Heading";Also applies to: 8-8
Client/src/Components/Check/Check.jsx (2)
Line range hint
53-55: Knees weak, arms heavy, this spacing's not ready! 🍝The space handling between
noHighlightTextandtextcould be improved. Consider using string template literals or proper spacing components.Here's a cleaner approach:
-{noHighlightText && <Typography component="span">{noHighlightText}</Typography>}{" "} -{text} +{noHighlightText ? ( + <> + <Typography component="span">{noHighlightText}</Typography> + + {text} + </> +) : text}
Line range hint
65-70: Mom's spaghetti moment: Documentation needs updating! 📝The JSDoc comments at the top of the component need to be updated to include the new
noHighlightTextprop.Add this to the JSDoc params:
+ * @param {string} [props.noHighlightText] - Additional text to display without highlighting.Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/StatusBox.jsx (3)
Line range hint
16-40: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's clean up this conditional logic!The current if-else chain is making my knees weak. We could make this cleaner with a status mapping object.
Here's a cleaner approach:
- let color; - let icon; - if (title === "up") { - color = theme.palette.success.main; - icon = ( - <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 8 }}> - <Arrow /> - </Box> - ); - } else if (title === "down") { - color = theme.palette.error.main; - icon = ( - <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, transform: "rotate(180deg)", top: 5 }}> - <Arrow /> - </Box> - ); - } else if (title === "paused") { - color = theme.palette.warning.main; - icon = ( - <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 12, right: 12 }}> - <ClockSnooze /> - </Box> - ); - } + const STATUS_CONFIG = { + up: { + color: theme.palette.success.main, + icon: <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 8 }}><Arrow /></Box> + }, + down: { + color: theme.palette.error.main, + icon: <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, transform: "rotate(180deg)", top: 5 }}><Arrow /></Box> + }, + paused: { + color: theme.palette.warning.main, + icon: <Box sx={{ ...sharedStyles, top: 12, right: 12 }}><ClockSnooze /></Box> + } + }; + const { color, icon } = STATUS_CONFIG[title];
Line range hint
71-77: Lose yourself in accessibility - we got one shot!The fixed pixel sizes (fontSize={36}) might cause accessibility concerns. Also, we're relying heavily on color alone to indicate status.
Consider these improvements:
- fontSize={36} + fontSize={{ xs: "1.5rem", sm: "2.25rem" }} + aria-label={`${title} status: ${value}`} + role="status"
Line range hint
11-15: Opportunity to drop some sick performance beats!The
sharedStylesobject is being recreated on each render. Let's memoize it withuseMemoto keep it fresh.+ import { useMemo } from "react"; const StatusBox = ({ title, value }) => { const theme = useTheme(); - let sharedStyles = { + const sharedStyles = useMemo(() => ({ position: "absolute", right: 8, opacity: 0.5, "& svg path": { stroke: theme.palette.other.icon }, - }; + }), [theme.palette.other.icon]);Client/src/Components/Charts/BarChart/index.jsx (3)
8-8: Yo! That TODO comment needs some love!The TODO comment is just hanging there like mom's spaghetti. Let's add proper prop validation and documentation to help other developers.
Want me to whip up some proper PropTypes validation and JSDoc documentation for this component? Just say the word!
Line range hint
19-25: These magic numbers are making me nervous!The hardcoded values
50for responseTime and25for array length are giving me weak knees. We should extract these as named constants to make the code more maintainable.Here's a suggestion to make it cleaner:
+const AVERAGE_RESPONSE_TIME = 50; +const REQUIRED_CHECK_COUNT = 25; // set responseTime to average if there's only one check if (checks.length === 1) { - checks[0] = { ...checks[0], responseTime: 50 }; + checks[0] = { ...checks[0], responseTime: AVERAGE_RESPONSE_TIME }; } -if (checks.length !== 25) { - const placeholders = Array(25 - checks.length).fill("placeholder"); +if (checks.length !== REQUIRED_CHECK_COUNT) { + const placeholders = Array(REQUIRED_CHECK_COUNT - checks.length).fill("placeholder"); checks = [...checks, ...placeholders]; }
Line range hint
117-134: These magic spacing numbers are making me dizzy!The tooltip styling has hardcoded font sizes (12, 11) and various spacing values. These should be coming from the theme to maintain consistency.
Here's how we can clean this up:
"& .MuiTooltip-tooltip p": { - fontSize: 12, + fontSize: theme.typography.caption.fontSize, color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, fontWeight: 500, }, "& .MuiTooltip-tooltip span": { - fontSize: 11, + fontSize: theme.typography.caption.fontSize, color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, fontWeight: 600, },Client/src/Components/ProgressBars/index.jsx (1)
88-88: Knees weak, arms heavy, but this color change is ready! 💪The error text color update to
error.contrastTextis on point. Would be dope to add a comment explaining the contrast requirements though!Add a comment like:
<Typography component="p" className="input-error" + // Using contrastText to ensure WCAG AA compliance against error.dark background color={theme.palette.error.contrastText} >Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
44-44: Yo, let's tackle that TODO and make this component self-contained! 💪That TODO about keeping search state inside the component is looking kinda sus. Moving the state management inside could make this component cleaner, but we gotta make sure it doesn't break existing use cases.
Want me to whip up a refactored version using React's useState hook? Just say the word and I'll drop that heat! 🎤
Line range hint
183-195: Yo, these PropTypes are decent but could be even more fire! 🎯The
valueprop type could use some extra sauce. Since it's used with the Autocomplete component, we could make it more specific:- value: PropTypes.array, + value: PropTypes.oneOfType([ + PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape({ + [PropTypes.string]: PropTypes.any + })), + PropTypes.shape({ + [PropTypes.string]: PropTypes.any + }) + ]),This would better handle both single and multiple selection modes. Keep it real with those types! 💯
Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (5)
4-4: Yo! What's the deal with this commented font family?The commented-out
fontFamilySecondarysuggests incomplete work. If it's not needed, remove it. If it's for future use, add a TODO comment explaining the plan.
6-8: Mom's spaghetti moment: Shadow values need a new home!The TODO comment suggests moving the color out. Let's extract this to a separate constants file for better maintainability.
- const shadow = - "0px 4px 24px -4px rgba(16, 24, 40, 0.08), 0px 3px 3px -3px rgba(16, 24, 40, 0.03)";Create a new file
shadowConstants.js:export const shadows = { default: "0px 4px 24px -4px rgba(16, 24, 40, 0.08), 0px 3px 3px -3px rgba(16, 24, 40, 0.03)" };
11-34: Knees weak, arms heavy: Let's make typography more semantic!The typography implementation is solid, but consider using semantic names instead of h1, h2, etc. This would make the code more maintainable and meaningful.
typography: { fontFamily: fontFamilyPrimary, fontSize: 14, - h1: { + pageTitle: { fontSize: typographyLevels.xl, color: palette.text.primary, fontWeight: 500, }, - h2: { + sectionHeading: { fontSize: typographyLevels.l, color: palette.text.secondary, fontWeight: 400, },
35-47: There's vomit on his sweater: Chart styles need their own component!The TODO is right - these chart styles should live within the gauge component. This would improve encapsulation and make the theme more maintainable.
Consider creating a new component-specific theme file:
// components/Gauge/theme.js export const gaugeTheme = (palette) => ({ header: { fontWeight: 400, fill: palette.text.tertiary, fontSize: typographyLevels.m, }, subheader: { fontWeight: 400, fill: palette.text.tertiary, fontSize: typographyLevels.xs, }, });
213-217: But on the surface he looks calm and ready: Consolidate shape constants!These shape values should be part of the same constants file suggested earlier.
- shape: { - borderRadius: 2, - borderThick: 2, - boxShadow: shadow, - }, + shape: { + borderRadius: borders.radiusSmall, + borderThick: borders.widthThick, + boxShadow: shadows.default, + },Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (1)
7-14: These typography calculations are making my knees weak!Consider simplifying the REM calculations and using more semantic names:
const typographyLevels = { base: typographyBase, - xs: `${(typographyBase - 4) / 16}rem`, - s: `${(typographyBase - 2) / 16}rem`, - m: `${typographyBase / 16}rem`, - l: `${(typographyBase + 2) / 16}rem`, - xl: `${(typographyBase + 10) / 16}rem`, + caption: `${0.625}rem`, // 10px + small: `${0.75}rem`, // 12px + body: `${0.875}rem`, // 14px + subtitle: `${1}rem`, // 16px + heading: `${1.5}rem`, // 24px };Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (1)
86-86: Mom's spaghetti moment: Required field indicator needs attention!The required field asterisk color change should maintain visual hierarchy while being accessible. Consider adding an aria-label for screen readers.
<Typography component="span" ml={theme.spacing(1)} color={theme.palette.error.contrastText} + aria-label="required field" > * </Typography>Client/src/App.jsx (2)
70-81: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's talk about that gradient!The implementation of GlobalStyles with a dynamic radial gradient based on theme palette is clean, but there's room for improvement to make it more maintainable.
Consider extracting the gradient configuration to a separate theme constant:
+ // in theme constants file + export const gradientConfig = { + light: { + color1: '#...', + // ... other colors + }, + dark: { + color1: '#...', + // ... other colors + } + }; - backgroundImage: `radial-gradient(circle, ${palette.gradient.color1}... + backgroundImage: `radial-gradient(circle, ${theme.gradientConfig[mode].color1}...
Line range hint
70-230: One shot, one opportunity: Let's not miss this chance to improve error boundaries!While the route structure is solid, we should consider adding error boundaries around the main route groups to improve error handling and user experience.
Consider wrapping route groups with error boundaries:
import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary'; // Inside Routes component <ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={ErrorFallback}> <Route exact path="/" element={<HomeLayout />}> // ... protected routes </Route> </ErrorBoundary> <ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={AuthErrorFallback}> // ... auth routes </ErrorBoundary>Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Details/Charts/index.jsx (3)
204-207: Heads up! Same color situation here!The same color pattern is used here as in the UpBarChart. For consistency across the app, we should handle error states the same way everywhere.
-? theme.palette.error.contrastText -: chartHovered - ? theme.palette.error.light - : theme.palette.error.contrastText +? theme.palette.error.main +: chartHovered + ? theme.palette.error.light + : theme.palette.error.main
249-266: Yo dawg, these response time thresholds need a second look!
The jump from 200ms to 500ms for the "Fair" category is pretty big. Consider adding an intermediate category around 350ms.
The color changes look solid for improving contrast, but there's some inconsistency:
- Success/Warning categories use
.darkfor background- Error category mixes
.contrastTextwith.darkConsider defining these thresholds as constants:
const RESPONSE_TIME_THRESHOLDS = { EXCELLENT: 200, FAIR: 350, // New suggested threshold ACCEPTABLE: 500, POOR: 600 };
Line range hint
1-338: Mom's spaghetti time - let's clean this up!A few overall suggestions to make this code more robust:
- That TODO about removing reversed data needs addressing
- Magic numbers should be constants:
max = 1000- Bar sizes (
maxBarSize={7})- Missing error handling for edge cases:
- Empty data arrays
- Null response times
- Values exceeding max
Want me to help create a constants file and add error handling? Just say the word! 🍝
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx (4)
23-23: Consider moving time constants to a shared utility file, eh?The
MS_PER_MINUTEconstant could be useful in other components. Let's make it more reusable by moving it to a shared constants file.- const MS_PER_MINUTE = 60000;Create a new file
src/Constants/time.js:export const MS_PER_MINUTE = 60000; export const MS_PER_HOUR = MS_PER_MINUTE * 60; export const MS_PER_DAY = MS_PER_HOUR * 24;
111-128: Let's make those error messages more Canadian-friendly, eh?The error handling is solid but could be more user-friendly. Consider enhancing the error messages and adding more specific validation feedback.
- createToast({ body: "Error validation data." }); + createToast({ + body: "Sorry about that! Please check the highlighted fields and try again.", + severity: "warning" + }); - body: "The endpoint you entered doesn't resolve. Check the URL again.", + body: "We couldn't reach that website. Mind double-checking the URL?",
148-156: Those monitoring frequencies are more packed than a Tim Hortons during morning rush!The 3-minute interval might be too aggressive for page speed monitoring and could impact performance metrics. Consider adjusting the minimum interval.
const frequencies = [ - { _id: 3, name: "3 minutes" }, - { _id: 5, name: "5 minutes" }, + { _id: 15, name: "15 minutes" }, { _id: 20, name: "20 minutes" }, { _id: 60, name: "1 hour" }, { _id: 1440, name: "1 day" }, { _id: 10080, name: "1 week" }, ];
352-360: That disabled state logic is more complicated than maple syrup production!The disabled state expression can be simplified, and we should add a tooltip to explain why the button is disabled.
<LoadingButton variant="contained" color="primary" onClick={handleCreateMonitor} - disabled={Object.keys(errors).length !== 0 && true} + disabled={Object.keys(errors).length > 0} + title={Object.keys(errors).length > 0 ? "Please fix the errors before creating the monitor" : ""} loading={isLoading} > Create monitor </LoadingButton>Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx (2)
365-365: Yo, that contrast change is fire! 🔥The switch from
texttocontrastTextfor error states improves visibility. Solid choice!Consider extracting these score thresholds into constants at the top of the file for better maintainability:
+const SCORE_THRESHOLDS = { + SUCCESS: 90, + WARNING: 50, + ERROR: 0 +}; // Then in the component: let bg = score >= SCORE_THRESHOLDS.SUCCESS ? theme.palette.success.main : score >= SCORE_THRESHOLDS.WARNING ? theme.palette.warning.main : score >= SCORE_THRESHOLDS.ERROR ? theme.palette.error.contrastText : theme.palette.unresolved.main;
Line range hint
366-374: Mom's spaghetti moment in this regex! 🍝The value/unit parsing logic could use some cleanup to make it more robust and readable.
Here's a cleaner approach:
-const match = audit.displayValue.match(/(\d+\.?\d*)\s*([a-zA-Z]+)/); -let value; -let unit; -if (match) { - value = match[1]; - match[2] === "s" ? (unit = "seconds") : (unit = match[2]); -} else { - value = audit.displayValue; -} +const UNIT_MAPPINGS = { + s: 'seconds', +}; + +const parseDisplayValue = (displayValue) => { + const match = displayValue.match(/^([\d.]+)\s*([a-zA-Z]+)?$/); + if (!match) return { value: displayValue }; + + const [, value, rawUnit] = match; + const unit = UNIT_MAPPINGS[rawUnit] || rawUnit; + return { value, unit }; +}; + +const { value, unit } = parseDisplayValue(audit.displayValue);This refactor:
- Makes the regex pattern more precise
- Extracts unit mapping to a maintainable object
- Uses destructuring for cleaner code
- Handles edge cases better
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx (2)
153-153: These TODOs need more sauce! 🍝The TODO comments lack context and clear action items. Let's make them more actionable:
- Line 153: "refactor this, there are a some ternaries and comments in the return"
- Line 308: "Do we ever get here?"
Consider updating them with:
- What specifically needs to be refactored and why
- What conditions lead to the questioned code path
- Acceptance criteria for the changes
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these TODOs?
Also applies to: 308-308
Line range hint
551-574: Time to drop that commented theme switcher code! 🎯There's a chunk of commented-out theme switcher code that should be removed if it's no longer needed. This includes the menu items for Light/Dark mode switching.
- {/* <MenuItem - onClick={() => { - dispatch(setMode("light")); - closePopup(); - }} - > - Light - </MenuItem> - <MenuItem - onClick={() => { - dispatch(setMode("dark")); - closePopup(); - }} - > - Dark - </MenuItem> */}Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js (1)
55-55: Update 'uptimeGood' to use a success colourNoticed a note on line 55 about changing 'uptimeGood' to a success colour. Let's make that change to keep our uptime looking excellent.
Apply this diff:
- uptimeGood: warning.main.dark /* Change for a success color? ?*/, + uptimeGood: success.main.dark,Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (3)
58-60: Update 'uptimeGood' colour to a success colourIn the
percentagesection, there's a note to changeuptimeGoodto use a success colour for better semantic meaning.Consider applying this diff:
- uptimeGood: warning.main.light /* Change for a success color? */, + uptimeGood: success.light.light,
5-8: Address the TODO regarding palette key usageThe comment suggests checking if all palette keys are used across the codebase. This is important for cleaning up unused definitions.
Would you like assistance in identifying unused palette keys? I can help generate a script to locate their usage.
108-108: Implement a unified theme function with mode parameterThe TODO notes that a single theme function accepting a mode parameter could be beneficial. This would streamline theme management.
Let me know if you'd like help in refactoring to a unified theme function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Client/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (33)
Client/package.json(1 hunks)Client/src/App.css(0 hunks)Client/src/App.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Components/Alert/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/BarChart/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Components/Check/Check.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/HOC/withAdminCheck.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Heading/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Radio/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Label/index.css(0 hunks)Client/src/Components/Label/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Layouts/HomeLayout/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/ProgressBars/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx(6 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Maintenance/MaintenanceTable/ActionsMenu/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Details/Charts/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/CurrentMonitoring/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/StatusBox.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/actionsMenu.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/index.css(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/utils.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/Charts/PieChart.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/ReadMe.md(0 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- Client/src/App.css
- Client/src/Components/Label/index.css
- Client/src/Pages/ReadMe.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- Client/src/Components/Layouts/HomeLayout/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Maintenance/MaintenanceTable/ActionsMenu/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/actionsMenu.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/index.css
🔇 Additional comments (31)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx (2)
1-2: Beauty, eh! The imports look good!
The separation between external and internal imports is well-organized.
22-22: Take off, the export looks great!
The named export follows best practices and enables proper tree-shaking.
Client/src/Components/HOC/withAdminCheck.jsx (2)
Line range hint 26-36: Clean HOC implementation, straight fire! 🔥
The HOC pattern implementation is solid with proper display name handling and props forwarding.
4-5: Yo dawg, these import paths look straight but let's double-check!
The updated import paths seem correct, but we should verify they're properly resolving to avoid any spaghetti imports.
✅ Verification successful
Whew! The import paths are correct and everything's in order.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the import paths exist and are correctly structured
# Expected: Both files should exist at the specified paths
# Check if Logger exists at the specified path
fd -t f "Logger.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" -d 3
# Check if main exists at the specified path
fd -t f "main.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" -d 3
Length of output: 707
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the import paths exist and are correctly structured using glob patterns
# Expected: Both files should exist at the specified paths
# Check if Logger exists at the specified path
fd --type f --glob "Logger.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" . -d 3
# Check if main exists at the specified path
fd --type f --glob "main.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" . -d 3
Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of 'Logger' files in 'Client/src/Utils/'
# Expected: At least one 'Logger.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' file exists in 'Client/src/Utils/'
fd --type f --glob "Logger.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" ./Client/src/Utils/
Length of output: 94
Client/src/Components/Heading/index.jsx (1)
1-2: Yo, these imports are straight fire!
Clean and properly ordered imports, eh? That's what I'm talking about!
Client/package.json (1)
15-16: Let's verify these dependency versions are compatible, fam! 🤔
The updates to @emotion and @mui packages look reasonable, but let's double-check their compatibility.
Also applies to: 20-20
✅ Verification successful
Dependency Compatibility Confirmed ✅
I've double-checked, and the versions of @emotion/react, @emotion/styled, and @mui/material are compatible with each other.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility between @emotion and @mui versions
# Check for known compatibility issues in the npm registry
echo "Checking @emotion/[email protected] compatibility..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@emotion/react/11.13.3 | jq '.peerDependencies'
echo "Checking @emotion/[email protected] compatibility..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@emotion/styled/11.13.0 | jq '.peerDependencies'
echo "Checking @mui/[email protected] compatibility..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@mui/material/5.16.7 | jq '.peerDependencies'
Length of output: 830
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Radio/index.jsx (1)
44-44: Yo dawg, this theme change is straight fire! 🔥
The switch from hardcoded color to theme.palette.secondary.main is on point and aligns perfectly with our theme refactoring goals. Let's just make sure we're consistent across the whole app.
✅ Verification successful
All clear! 🎉
No remaining hardcoded colors found and theme.palette.secondary.main is consistently used. Great job!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining hardcoded color values similar to the old one
# and verify consistent usage of secondary.main for borders/outlines
# Search for any remaining hardcoded hex colors similar to the old value
rg -i '#656a74'
# Check for consistent usage of secondary.main in similar contexts
ast-grep --pattern 'boxShadow: `$$$${theme.palette.$$$}`'
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find any boxShadow properties with hardcoded color values
rg -i 'boxShadow:\s*`[^`]*#([0-9a-fA-F]{3}){1,2}[^`]*`'
# Description: Verify all boxShadow usages utilize theme.palette.secondary.main
ast-grep --pattern 'boxShadow: `inset 0 0 0 1px ${theme.palette.secondary.main}`'
Length of output: 141
Client/src/Components/Check/Check.jsx (1)
27-27: Yo, this color change is straight fire! 🔥
Switching from error.text to error.contrastText is a solid move for better text visibility and theme consistency.
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Home/StatusBox.jsx (1)
28-28: Yo dawg, let's verify that contrast ratio!
The switch to theme.palette.error.main looks solid for consistency, but we gotta make sure our users can read this stuff clearly, know what I'm sayin'?
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/utils.jsx (1)
31-32: Yo, these gradient changes are fire! 🔥
The switch to using .dark variants with light-to-dark gradients creates a more visually appealing depth effect. The consistency across different status types is on point!
Let's make sure the pending state's different treatment is intentional:
Also applies to: 37-38, 43-44
Client/src/Components/Alert/index.jsx (1)
37-37: Let's verify the theme structure across the codebase! 🎤
Since this is part of a larger theme refactoring effort, we should check how other components are handling these theme properties.
Client/src/Components/ProgressBars/index.jsx (2)
37-37: Yo dawg, this background color change is straight fire! 🔥
The switch to theme.palette.error.dark keeps it consistent with the new theme system. Clean move!
41-44: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's verify that contrast! 🍝
The switch to error.contrastText is solid for accessibility, but we should double-check the contrast ratio.
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx (1)
102-102: Yo dawg, this theme change is straight fire! 🔥
The switch to theme.palette.error.contrastText is on point and keeps it consistent with the theme refactoring goals. Nice work maintaining that design system harmony!
Client/src/Components/Label/index.jsx (3)
34-34: Yo, this border styling change is fire! 🔥
The switch to using a complete border property with theme values is cleaner and more maintainable. Nice work keeping it consistent with the theme system!
134-146: Mom's spaghetti moment - we've got some cleanup to do! 🍝
- There are leftover comment artifacts (
/* dark */and/* light */) that should be removed. - The color mapping changes look consistent across states, using the dark variant for backgrounds.
Here's the cleanup needed:
- bgColor: theme.palette.success./* dark */ contrastText,
- borderColor: theme.palette.success.main /* light */,
+ bgColor: theme.palette.success.contrastText,
+ borderColor: theme.palette.success.main,Let's verify the color scheme consistency:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent color token usage across theme
rg -A 2 "palette\.(error|warning|success)\.(dark|contrastText|main)" src/130-131: Yo dawg, let's make sure these colors pop! 👀
The switch from bg to contrastText for the background could affect readability. Let's verify the contrast ratios meet accessibility standards.
Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (1)
244-244: Clean exports, no spaghetti code here!
The export statement is clean and properly aliases semanticColors to colors.
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (2)
70-70: Yo dawg, let's verify that contrast ratio for the error border!
The change from error.text to error.contrastText for the fieldset border needs to be checked for sufficient contrast against the background. This is crucial for maintaining accessibility standards.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for consistent usage of error.contrastText in other form components
rg -l "error\.contrastText.*fieldset" --type jsx
# Look for any accessibility-related comments or issues
rg -l "accessibility|a11y|contrast|WCAG" --type jsxLine range hint 192-196: Knees weak, arms heavy: Error message styling needs consistency check!
The error message opacity of 0.8 combined with the new contrastText color might affect readability. Let's ensure this matches the design system's error state guidelines.
Client/src/App.jsx (3)
31-33: Yo! These import paths are looking fresh! 🍝
The reorganization of component imports into dedicated folders (Components/Layouts and Components/HOC) is a solid improvement for maintainability. The addition of the Infrastructure component aligns well with the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 41-41
92-92: Straight fire! That root path redirect is clean! 🔥
The change from a direct component to a redirect aligns perfectly with the PR objectives for streamlining navigation.
110-129: These routes got me nervous, but they're organized right!
The pagespeed and infrastructure routes are well-structured and consistently follow the protected route pattern. However, let's verify the route ordering to prevent potential path conflicts.
✅ Verification successful
Route ordering confirmed: The pagespeed and infrastructure routes are structured correctly to prevent potential conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential route path conflicts
rg -A 1 'path="pagespeed' ./src/Pages --type jsx
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential route path conflicts in .jsx files
rg 'path="pagespeed' ./src --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx' --type jsx
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential route path conflicts in .jsx files within Client/src
rg 'path="pagespeed' ./Client/src --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx' --type jsx
Length of output: 284
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Details/Charts/index.jsx (1)
64-64: Yo! Let's verify this color choice, fam!
The switch from error.text to error.contrastText might not be the best move here. contrastText is typically meant for text that needs to pop against error backgrounds, not for the bars themselves. Consider using error.main instead for better semantic meaning.
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/Charts/PieChart.jsx (2)
130-131: Yo, these color changes are straight fire! 🔥
The switch to contrastText and dark variants improves accessibility and follows Material UI's best practices. These changes provide better text contrast against colored backgrounds.
137-138: Yo dawg, we need to verify these error states! 👀
While the warning state changes look solid, the error state's use of contrastText for the stroke might affect visibility. Let's make sure it's visually distinct enough.
Consider keeping the stroke as theme.palette.error.main for better visibility:
-stroke: theme.palette.error.contrastText,
+stroke: theme.palette.error.main,Also applies to: 142-145
✅ Verification successful
Error state visibility is consistent across the codebase. No action required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using error states for consistency
rg -l "palette.error" | xargs rg "contrastText|dark" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 18137
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx (3)
57-57: Infrastructure menu item looking fresh! 👌
The addition of the Infrastructure menu item aligns perfectly with the PR objectives and maintains consistency with the existing menu structure.
151-151: Solid dependency array update! 💪
Adding location to the dependency array ensures the effect properly reacts to route changes. This is a crucial fix that prevents potential stale closure issues.
186-192: Clean formatting on the logo click handler! ✨
The reformatted click handler improves readability while maintaining functionality.
Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (2)
35-36: Verify 'light' and 'dark' property assignments
Both 'light' and 'dark' properties for the secondary palette are assigned secondary.dark.light. This might not be intentional.
Please ensure that:
- The
lightproperty should besecondary.light.light. - The
darkproperty remainssecondary.dark.light.
If so, apply this change:
- light: secondary.dark.light,
+ light: secondary.light.light,68-68: Confirm assignment for 'divider' property
The divider is set to border.light.light. Ensure this aligns with the design guidelines and provides the intended visual separation.
| function Heading({ component, children }) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Typography | ||
| component={component} | ||
| variant="h2" | ||
| fontWeight={600} | ||
| > | ||
| {children} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Client/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -11,12 +11,13 @@ | |||
| "preview": "vite preview" | |||
| }, | |||
| "dependencies": { | |||
| "@emotion/react": "^11.11.4", | |||
| "@emotion/styled": "^11.11.5", | |||
| "6": "^0.0.1", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo! This "6" package looks sus! 🍝
The package named "6" seems highly unusual and potentially erroneous. Package names typically describe their purpose, and single-digit names are extremely rare in the npm ecosystem.
Please verify if this was added intentionally or if it's a typo. If unintended, remove this line:
- "6": "^0.0.1",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "6": "^0.0.1", |
| bg: theme.palette.warning.dark, | ||
| light: theme.palette.warning.light, | ||
| stroke: theme.palette.warning.main, | ||
| }, | ||
| pending: { | ||
| bg: theme.palette.warning.bg, | ||
| bg: theme.palette.warning.dark, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, we might have a UX spaghetti situation here! 🍝
The paused and pending states are now using identical styling properties:
paused: {
bg: theme.palette.warning.dark,
light: theme.palette.warning.light,
stroke: theme.palette.warning.main,
},
pending: { // Same values as paused
bg: theme.palette.warning.dark,
light: theme.palette.warning.light,
stroke: theme.palette.warning.main,
},This might make it difficult for users to distinguish between these different states visually.
Consider using slightly different shades or adding subtle visual indicators to help users differentiate between paused and pending states. For example:
pending: {
- bg: theme.palette.warning.dark,
+ bg: theme.palette.warning.main, // Using main instead of dark
light: theme.palette.warning.light,
stroke: theme.palette.warning.main,
},There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ajhollid I agree this could be a problem, but I say we wait until we spot those bugs, then we can decide what to do UI wise, what do you say?
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiPaper: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => { | ||
| return { | ||
| marginTop: 4, | ||
| padding: 0, | ||
| border: 1, | ||
| borderStyle: "solid", | ||
| borderColor: theme.palette.border.light, | ||
| borderRadius: 4, | ||
| boxShadow: shadow, | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main, | ||
| backgroundImage: "none", | ||
| }; | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiList: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: { | ||
| padding: 0, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiListItemButton: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: { | ||
| transition: "none", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiMenuItem: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => ({ | ||
| borderRadius: 4, | ||
| backgroundColor: "inherit", | ||
| padding: "4px 6px", | ||
| color: theme.palette.text.secondary, | ||
| fontSize: 13, | ||
| margin: 2, | ||
| minWidth: 100, | ||
| "&:hover, &.Mui-selected, &.Mui-selected:hover, &.Mui-selected.Mui-focusVisible": | ||
| { | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.fill, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiTableCell: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => ({ | ||
| borderBottomColor: theme.palette.border.light, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiTableHead: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => ({ | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.accent, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiPagination: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => ({ | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main, | ||
| border: 1, | ||
| borderStyle: "solid", | ||
| borderColor: theme.palette.border.light, | ||
| "& button": { | ||
| color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, | ||
| borderRadius: 4, | ||
| }, | ||
| "& li:first-of-type button, & li:last-of-type button": { | ||
| border: 1, | ||
| borderStyle: "solid", | ||
| borderColor: theme.palette.border.light, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiPaginationItem: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => ({ | ||
| "&:not(.MuiPaginationItem-ellipsis):hover, &.Mui-selected": { | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.fill, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| MuiSkeleton: { | ||
| styleOverrides: { | ||
| root: ({ theme }) => ({ | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.unresolved.bg, | ||
| }), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
He's nervous: Extract magic numbers to constants!
There are several hard-coded values (border widths, padding, etc.) that should be extracted to theme constants.
Create a new constants file:
// themeConstants.js
export const spacing = {
xxs: 2,
xs: 4,
s: 6,
// ...
};
export const borders = {
width: 1,
radius: 4,
// ...
};There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is also something that must be done later
| backgroundColor: `${theme.palette.secondary.main} !important`, | ||
| color: `${theme.palette.secondary.contrastText} !important`, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Lose yourself: Avoid using !important!
Using !important is generally a code smell and can lead to specificity wars. Consider restructuring the CSS to avoid this.
- backgroundColor: `${theme.palette.secondary.main} !important`,
- color: `${theme.palette.secondary.contrastText} !important`,
+ backgroundColor: theme.palette.secondary.main,
+ color: theme.palette.secondary.contrastText,Then, ensure the selector specificity is high enough to override other styles.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was necessary because MUI has LOTS of opinions
| icon: { | ||
| light: paletteColors.blueGray150, | ||
| }, | ||
| line: { | ||
| light: paletteColors.gray200, | ||
| }, | ||
| grid: { | ||
| light: paletteColors.gray300, | ||
| dark: paletteColors.gray600, | ||
| }, | ||
| autofill: { | ||
| light: paletteColors.blueGray20, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Lost yourself in the dark mode: Missing dark values!
Several properties in the 'other' category are missing dark mode values:
- icon
- line
- autofill
Add the missing dark mode values to maintain consistency across themes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We are not using those (it uses other colors from the dark palette)
| @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ import { useLocation, useNavigate } from "react-router"; | |||
| import { useTheme } from "@emotion/react"; | |||
| import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux"; | |||
| import { clearAuthState } from "../../Features/Auth/authSlice"; | |||
| import { setMode, toggleSidebar } from "../../Features/UI/uiSlice"; | |||
| import { /* setMode, */ toggleSidebar } from "../../Features/UI/uiSlice"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, let's clean up these commented imports! 🧹
I notice we've got some commented-out imports hanging around. If we're not using these features anymore, we should remove them completely rather than leaving them commented out. This includes:
- The
setModeimport on line 22 - The
StatusPagesimport on line 32
-import { /* setMode, */ toggleSidebar } from "../../Features/UI/uiSlice";
+import { toggleSidebar } from "../../Features/UI/uiSlice";
-/* import StatusPages from "../../assets/icons/status-pages.svg?react"; */Also applies to: 32-32
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall this is a great improvement to the Theme. I am really happy with the refactor to a Global theme with Light and Dark extending that theme, much more maintainable.
Minor changes requested:
- There are a couple typos here and there that should be corrected
- Please add JSdoc for all pages/components/theme files so we have consistent documentation throughout the app 👍
- Minor suggestion around the Heading component
Other than that it looks really great, I appreciate all the work getting the theme up to speed!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js (3)
5-23: Yo dawg, let's add some type safety to this destructuring!The destructuring looks clean like mom's spaghetti, but we could make it even better with TypeScript. This would help catch potential typos and provide better IDE support.
+ type ColorConfig = { + primary: ColorSet; + secondary: ColorSet; + // ... other color definitions + }; + + const { + primary, + secondary, + // ... rest of destructuring + }: ColorConfig = colors;
51-98: Yo, these semantic values need some documentation sauce! 🔥The comment about semantic structure is great, but let's make it even better by adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of each semantic section.
+ /** + * Semantic color definitions for different percentage ranges + * - uptimePoor: < 90% + * - uptimeFair: 90-95% + * - uptimeGood: 95-99% + * - uptimeExcellent: > 99% + */ percentage: { // ... existing code },
103-105: Let's make this theme creation faster than losing yourself in the music! 🎵Consider memoizing the theme creation to prevent unnecessary recalculations.
+ import { useMemo } from 'react'; - const darkTheme = createTheme({ + const darkTheme = useMemo(() => createTheme({ palette, ...baseTheme(palette), - }); + }), []);Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (2)
10-28: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's document these types! 🍜The destructuring is clean, but future developers might get weak knees trying to understand the expected shape of the colors object.
Add JSDoc type documentation above the destructuring:
+/** + * @typedef {Object} GradientColor + * @property {Object} light + * + * @typedef {Object} Colors + * @property {Object} primary + * @property {Object} secondary + * @property {Object} gradient + * ... etc + */ const { primary, secondary, // ... rest of destructuring } = colors;
108-111: Lose yourself in the theme - but make it DRY! 🎤The TODO is spot on! Having a single theme function with a mode parameter would reduce code duplication.
Consider this future refactor approach:
// Future theme.js const createAppTheme = (mode = 'light') => { const colors = mode === 'light' ? lightColors : darkColors; return createTheme({ palette: generatePalette(colors), ...baseTheme(palette) }); };This would eliminate the need for separate light/dark theme files. Want me to create an issue to track this improvement?
Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (2)
3-6: Address the TODO regarding font sizes in REM.The TODO comment indicates that all font sizes should be in REM and defined in this file. Ensuring consistent font sizing across the codebase improves maintainability and scalability.
Would you like assistance in identifying and updating font sizes defined in pixels throughout the codebase?
16-16: Review and refine the color palette and semantic colors.There's a TODO comment to review the color palette and semantic colors. Revisiting these can enhance visual consistency and alignment with the design system.
I can help in auditing the current color usage and suggest improvements. Let me know if you'd like assistance.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Client/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Client/package.json(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- Client/package.json
- Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (1)
6-8: Yo dawg, let's verify these palette keys! 🍝
That TODO's got a point - we should check if all these palette keys are actually being used in the codebase.
Let's drop some beats (and by beats, I mean run this script):
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, all these palette keys are being used like mom's spaghetti! 🍝
After dropping some mad beats through the codebase, I can confirm that all palette keys are being actively used. The search results show extensive usage of theme.palette across the application, including:
- Primary colors: Used in buttons, outlines, and interactive elements
- Text variants: primary, secondary, tertiary used for typography hierarchy
- Background colors: main, accent, fill used for different surface levels
- Border colors: light, dark used for separators and containers
- Status colors: success, error, warning used in labels and indicators
- Special palettes: percentage, unresolved used in specific components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for palette usage patterns in the codebase
echo "Searching for palette usage patterns..."
rg -g '!*.test.*' -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'palette\.' ./Client/src/
rg -g '!*.test.*' -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'theme\.palette' ./Client/src/
Length of output: 86310
Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (1)
229-241: Missing dark mode values for 'icon', 'line', and 'autofill' in 'other' category.
The properties icon, line, and autofill under the other category are missing dark mode values. This could result in inconsistent theming when switching to dark mode.
| percentage: { | ||
| uptimePoor: error.main.dark, | ||
| uptimeFair: warning.contrastText.dark, | ||
| uptimeGood: warning.main.dark /* Change for a success color? ?*/, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
That success color comment's making my knees weak! 🍝
Let's resolve that comment about changing to a success color instead of leaving it hanging. Consider using success.main.dark for consistency with the semantic meaning.
- uptimeGood: warning.main.dark /* Change for a success color? ?*/,
+ uptimeGood: success.main.dark,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uptimeGood: warning.main.dark /* Change for a success color? ?*/, | |
| uptimeGood: success.main.dark, |
| /* From this part on, try to create semantic structure, not feature based structure */ | ||
| percentage: { | ||
| uptimePoor: error.main.light, | ||
| uptimeFair: warning.contrastText.light, | ||
| uptimeGood: warning.main.light /* Change for a success color? */, | ||
| uptimeExcellent: success.main.light, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Catch that vomit! There's a color confusion in your sweater! 🤢
The comment suggests using a success color for uptimeGood, which makes sense semantically.
Let's fix that color mapping:
uptimePoor: error.main.light,
uptimeFair: warning.contrastText.light,
- uptimeGood: warning.main.light /* Change for a success color? */,
+ uptimeGood: success.light.light,
uptimeExcellent: success.main.light,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| light: paletteColors.blueBlueWave, | ||
| dark: paletteColors.blueBlueWave, | ||
| }, | ||
| // TODO we dont have primary light, dark or contrast text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define 'primary' light, dark, or contrast text colors.
The TODO comment mentions the absence of primary light, dark, or contrast text colors. Defining these will ensure that primary elements are styled correctly across different themes.
Would you like help in selecting appropriate colors for these properties?
|
I believe I addressed all the points raised @ajhollid . Thanks for your review! |
Primary
Secondary