feat/fe/infrastructure details, resolves #1068 #1167
Conversation
ajhollid
requested review from
marcelluscaio,
jennifer-gan,
shyna92 and
gorkem-bwl
ajhollid
changed the title
ajhollid
changed the title
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Change Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: This PR aims to implement the Infrastructure Monitor page for the BlueWave Uptime monitoring tool. It includes the addition of an AreaChart and an SVG-based Gauge component, new routes, and dummy data for testing.
- Key components modified:
- App.jsx: Modified to include the new route for infrastructure details.
- Charts: New components for AreaChart and CustomGauge.
- Utils: Utility functions for chart ticks and gradient definitions.
- InfrastructureDetails: New component for displaying infrastructure details.
- Cross-component impacts: Changes in routing and the addition of new chart components affect the overall UI structure and data flow.
- Business value alignment: The new feature enhances the monitoring capabilities of the tool, providing detailed insights into infrastructure metrics.
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: The addition of new routes and components expands the system's capabilities for monitoring infrastructure.
- Component interaction changes: New components interact with the existing routing system and fetch data from a dummy JSON file.
- Integration points impact: The new components are integrated into the existing UI framework, utilizing existing themes and styling.
- Dependency changes and implications: New dependencies on
rechartsfor charting andaxiosfor data fetching.
2. Deep Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Analysis
-
Client/src/App.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
import InfrastructureDetails from "./Pages/Infrastructure/details"; function App() { const InfrastructureDetailsWithAdminProp = withAdminProp(InfrastructureDetails); const mode = useSelector((state) => state.ui.mode); const { authToken } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); const dispatch = useDispatch(); useEffect(() => { if (authToken) { dispatch(getAppSettings({ authToken })); } }, [dispatch, authToken]); return ( <ThemeProvider theme={mode === "light" ? lightTheme : darkTheme}> <CssBaseline /> <GlobalStyles /> <Router> <Switch> <Route path="/infrastructure/:monitorId" element={<ProtectedRoute Component={InfrastructureDetailsWithAdminProp} />} /> <Route path="incidents/:monitorId?" element={<ProtectedRoute Component={Incidents} />} /> <Route path="status" element={<ProtectedRoute Component={Status} />} /> <Route path="integrations" element={<ProtectedRoute Component={Integrations} />} /> <Route path="*" element={<NotFound />} /> </Switch> </Router> </ThemeProvider> ); }
- Analysis:
- The new route for
/infrastructure/:monitorIdis added to integrate theInfrastructureDetailscomponent. - The
InfrastructureDetailscomponent is wrapped withwithAdminPropto enforce admin privileges. - No apparent issues, but ensure proper handling of unauthorized access.
- The new route for
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// No specific improvements needed for this part. - Improvement rationale :
- Technical benefits: Proper routing and access control.
- Business value: Enhanced security and user experience.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as it follows existing patterns.
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
const CustomAreaChart = ({ data, dataKey, xKey, yKey, xTick, yTick, strokeColor, fillColor, gradient = false, gradientDirection = "vertical", gradientStartColor, gradientEndColor, customTooltip, }) => { const theme = useTheme(); const gradientId = `gradient-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 9)}`; return ( <ResponsiveContainer width="100%" height="80%" // FE team HELP! Why does this overflow if set to 100%? > <AreaChart data={data}> <XAxis dataKey={xKey} {...(xTick && { tick: xTick })} /> <YAxis dataKey={yKey} {...(yTick && { tick: yTick })} /> {gradient === true && createGradient({ id: gradientId, startColor: gradientStartColor, endColor: gradientEndColor, direction: gradientDirection, })} <CartesianGrid stroke={theme.palette.border.light} strokeWidth={1} strokeOpacity={1} fill="transparent" vertical={false} /> <Area type="monotone" dataKey={dataKey} stroke={strokeColor} fill={gradient === true ? `url(#${gradientId})` : fillColor} /> {customTooltip ? ( <Tooltip cursor={{ stroke: theme.palette.border.light }} content={customTooltip} wrapperStyle={{ pointerEvents: "none" }} /> ) : ( <Tooltip /> )} </AreaChart> </ResponsiveContainer> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
CustomAreaChartcomponent is well-structured and utilizesrechartsfor rendering. - The height issue with the
ResponsiveContainerneeds investigation. - Gradient and tooltip customization are handled, but color choices could be improved.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Suggested improvement for height issue <ResponsiveContainer width="100%" height="100%" // Set to 100% and ensure parent container has appropriate styling >
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Proper responsiveness and layout.
- Business value: Enhanced user experience.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, but requires testing across different screen sizes.
- Submitted PR Code:
2.2 Implementation Quality
-
Code Structure:
- Organization and modularity: Components are well-organized and modular.
- Design pattern adherence: Follows React and Redux patterns.
- Reusability aspects: Components like
CustomAreaChartandCustomGaugeare reusable. - Maintainability factors: Code is readable and maintainable.
-
Error Handling:
- Exception scenarios coverage: Basic error handling is present, but could be enhanced.
- Recovery mechanisms: Needs improvement for network and data errors.
- Logging and monitoring: Basic logging is present, but could be expanded.
- User experience impact: Proper error messages and fallbacks can improve UX.
-
Performance Considerations:
- Resource utilization: Efficient use of resources.
- Scalability aspects: Components are designed to be scalable.
- Bottleneck analysis: No apparent bottlenecks.
- Optimization opportunities: Optimize data fetching and rendering for large datasets.
3. Risk Assessment
3.1 Critical Issues
🔴 P0 (Must Fix):
- Issue: Height overflow in
CustomAreaChart. - Impact:
- Technical implications: Layout issues and potential overflow.
- Business consequences: Poor user experience.
- User experience effects: Inconsistent display of charts.
- Resolution:
- Specific code changes: Adjust the height and ensure parent container styling.
- Configuration updates: None.
- Testing requirements: Test across different screen sizes.
3.2 Important Improvements
🟡 P1 (Should Fix):
- Issue: Color choices for charts.
- Current Impact:
- Performance implications: None.
- Maintenance overhead: Minimal.
- Future scalability: Ensures consistency with theme.
- Suggested Solution:
- Implementation approach: Define new colors in the theme if needed.
- Migration strategy: Update chart components to use theme colors.
- Testing considerations: Visual testing to ensure consistency.
3.3 Minor Suggestions
🟢 P2 (Consider):
- Area: Typography improvements.
- Improvement Opportunity:
- Code quality enhancement: Ensure consistent font weights and sizes.
- Best practice alignment: Follow design guidelines.
- Documentation updates: Update component documentation with typography guidelines.
4. Requirements Analysis
4.1 Functional Coverage
- Requirements mapping:
- Implemented features: Infrastructure details page with charts and gauges.
- Missing elements: Data validation and error handling.
- Edge cases handling: Basic handling, but can be improved.
- Business Logic:
- Use case coverage: Covers the primary use case of displaying infrastructure details.
- Business rule implementation: Follows the required business rules.
- Data flow correctness: Data flow is correctly implemented.
4.2 Non-functional Aspects
- Performance metrics: Efficient rendering and data fetching.
- Security considerations: Ensure proper access control and data validation.
- Scalability factors: Components are designed to be scalable.
- Maintainability aspects: Code is modular and maintainable.
5. Testing Strategy
- Test Coverage:
- Unit test requirements: Test individual components and utility functions.
- Integration test scenarios: Test data flow and component interactions.
- Edge case validation: Validate edge cases for data and rendering.
- Quality Metrics:
- Current coverage: Basic coverage.
- Critical paths: Ensure all critical paths are tested.
- Performance benchmarks: Measure rendering and data fetching performance.
6. Final Assessment
6.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical Changes (P0):
- Fix height overflow in
CustomAreaChart.
- Fix height overflow in
-
Important Improvements (P1):
- Improve color choices for charts.
-
Suggested Enhancements (P2):
- Enhance typography for consistency.
6.2 Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: The PR introduces well-structured components and follows best practices. Some areas need improvement, such as error handling and color choices.
- Business impact: The new feature enhances the monitoring capabilities of the tool, providing valuable insights into infrastructure metrics.
- Risk evaluation: Low to moderate risk, with critical issues identified and prioritized.
- Implementation quality: High-quality implementation with room for improvement in specific areas.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce several enhancements to the application's routing and charting capabilities. A new route for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/gradientUtils.jsx (3)
30-33: Bruh, this direction logic is making my knees weak! 💪The x1,y1,x2,y2 calculations for vertical direction are redundant - they're all setting the same values they would have by default.
Clean it up like mom's spaghetti:
- x1={direction === "vertical" ? "0" : "0"} - y1={direction === "vertical" ? "0" : "0"} - x2={direction === "vertical" ? "0" : "1"} - y2={direction === "vertical" ? "1" : "0"} + x1="0" + y1="0" + x2={direction === "horizontal" ? "1" : "0"} + y2={direction === "vertical" ? "1" : "0"}
35-44: Accessibility check - don't lose yourself in the colors! 🎤Consider adding color contrast validation to ensure the gradient remains accessible across its range.
Would you like me to create a utility function to validate color contrast ratios between the start and end colors? This would help ensure WCAG compliance.
1-17: Documentation's looking fresh, but could use some sauce! 🍝The JSDoc is solid, but could be enhanced with:
- Return value description for invalid inputs
- Color format specifications (hex, rgb, named colors)
- WCAG compliance considerations
Add these spicy meatballs to the docs:
/** * Creates an SVG gradient definition for use in charts * @param {Object} params - The gradient parameters * @param {string} [params.id="colorUv"] - Unique identifier for the gradient - * @param {string} params.startColor - Starting color of the gradient (hex, rgb, or color name) - * @param {string} params.endColor - Ending color of the gradient (hex, rgb, or color name) + * @param {string} params.startColor - Starting color of the gradient (hex: #RRGGBB, rgb(r,g,b), or CSS color name) + * @param {string} params.endColor - Ending color of the gradient (hex: #RRGGBB, rgb(r,g,b), or CSS color name) * @param {number} [params.startOpacity=0.8] - Starting opacity (0-1) * @param {number} [params.endOpacity=0] - Ending opacity (0-1) * @param {('vertical'|'horizontal')} [params.direction="vertical"] - Direction of the gradient * @returns {JSX.Element} SVG gradient definition element + * @throws {Error} When startColor or endColor is not provided + * @note Ensure sufficient contrast ratio between colors for WCAG compliance */Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/data.js (2)
8-10: Yo! These magic numbers are making me nervous! 😰The hardcoded date and magic numbers could cause maintenance headaches. Let's make this more configurable.
Consider this improvement:
-const baseTime = new Date("2024-11-15T07:00:00.000Z"); -const checks = Array.from({ length: 20 }, (_, index) => { - const timestamp = new Date(baseTime.getTime() + index * 5 * 60 * 1000); +const SAMPLE_COUNT = 20; +const INTERVAL_MINUTES = 5; +const baseTime = new Date(); // Use current time +const checks = Array.from({ length: SAMPLE_COUNT }, (_, index) => { + const timestamp = new Date(baseTime.getTime() + index * INTERVAL_MINUTES * 60 * 1000);
59-59: Yo! Let's add some TypeScript love to this export! 📝Adding type definitions would improve maintainability and provide better IDE support.
Consider creating a types file:
// types.ts export interface SystemCheck { _id: string; monitorId: string; status: boolean; responseTime: number; // ... rest of the properties } // data.ts import { SystemCheck } from './types'; const checks: SystemCheck[] = // ... existing code export default checks;Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx (3)
7-26: Yo dawg, let's beef up that documentation!The JSDoc is pretty solid, but it's missing validation info for the props. Consider adding:
@throwsfor invalid progress values (should be 0-100)@defaulttags for default values/** * A Performant SVG based circular gauge * * @component * @param {Object} props - Component properties - * @param {number} [props.progress=0] - Progress percentage (0-100) + * @param {number} [props.progress=0] - Progress percentage + * @throws {Error} When progress is not between 0 and 100 + * @default 0 * @param {number} [props.radius=60] - Radius of the gauge circle + * @default 60 * @param {string} [props.color="#000000"] - Color of the progress stroke + * @default "#000000" * @param {number} [props.strokeWidth=15] - Width of the gauge stroke + * @default 15 */
41-48: Let's make that animation smooth like butter!Instead of setTimeout, we could use CSS transitions for smoother animations and better performance.
- useEffect(() => { - setOffset(circumference); - const timer = setTimeout(() => { - setOffset(circumference - strokeLength); - }, 100); - - return () => clearTimeout(timer); - }, [progress, circumference, strokeLength]); + // Add to your CSS file + .radial-chart-progress { + transition: stroke-dashoffset 0.3s ease-in-out; + } + + useEffect(() => { + setOffset(circumference - strokeLength); + }, [progress, circumference, strokeLength]);
84-96: Let's clean up that styling, homie!Move those inline styles to a styled component or CSS class for better maintainability.
+ // Add to your CSS file + .radial-chart-text { + position: absolute; + top: 50%; + left: 50%; + transform: translate(-50%, -50%); + } <Typography className="radial-chart-text" - style={{ - position: "absolute", - top: "50%", - left: "50%", - transform: "translate(-50%, -50%)", - ...theme.typography.body2, - fill: theme.typography.body2.color, - }} + sx={{ + ...theme.typography.body2, + fill: theme.typography.body2.color, + }} >Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/index.jsx (2)
33-70: Yo dawg, your example code is fire but needs a small tweak! 🔥The example shows importing
CustomAreaChartfrom./CustomAreaChart, but since this is the actual component file, the import path would be different in real usage.Consider updating the example to show the actual import path:
-import CustomAreaChart from './CustomAreaChart'; +import CustomAreaChart from 'Components/Charts/AreaChart';
14-31: Knees weak, docs are heavy! There's a prop missing in the comments already! 🎤The
dataKeyprop is required according to PropTypes but isn't documented in the JSDoc.Add the missing prop documentation:
/** * @param {Object} props - The properties object. * @param {Array} props.data - The data array for the chart. + * @param {string} props.dataKey - The key for accessing data values. * @param {string} props.xKey - The key for the x-axis data.Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx (2)
18-41: Yo dawg, let's make this component faster than mom's spaghetti! 🍝The component looks solid, but we can prevent unnecessary re-renders by memoizing it with
React.memo(). Also, consider making the PropTypes more strict.Here's how to level up this component:
-export const TzTick = ({ x, y, payload, index }) => { +export const TzTick = React.memo(({ x, y, payload, index }) => { // ... component code ... -}; +}); TzTick.propTypes = { - x: PropTypes.number, + x: PropTypes.number.isRequired, - y: PropTypes.number, + y: PropTypes.number.isRequired, - payload: PropTypes.object, + payload: PropTypes.shape({ + value: PropTypes.oneOfType([ + PropTypes.string, + PropTypes.number, + PropTypes.instanceOf(Date) + ]).isRequired + }).isRequired, index: PropTypes.number, };
162-174: Keep it safe like your mom's spaghetti recipe! 🍝Let's add some safety nets to prevent those pesky runtime errors:
+const DEFAULT_PROPS = { + yIdx: -1, + payload: [], + active: false, +}; export const InfrastructureTooltip = ({ active, payload = DEFAULT_PROPS.payload, // ... other props }) => { // Add null checks const metricValue = payload?.[0]?.payload; if (!metricValue) return null; // ... rest of the component }; InfrastructureTooltip.defaultProps = DEFAULT_PROPS;Client/src/App.jsx (1)
133-137: Yo dawg, let's keep these routes organized!While the route implementation is correct, consider grouping related infrastructure routes together. Currently, there's a gap between the base infrastructure route and this details route.
Consider reorganizing like this:
- <Route - path="infrastructure" - element={<ProtectedRoute Component={Infrastructure} />} - /> - - <Route - path="infrastructure/:monitorId" - element={<ProtectedRoute Component={InfrastructureDetailsWithAdminProp} />} - /> + {/* Infrastructure routes */} + <Route path="infrastructure"> + <Route + index + element={<ProtectedRoute Component={Infrastructure} />} + /> + <Route + path=":monitorId" + element={<ProtectedRoute Component={InfrastructureDetailsWithAdminProp} />} + /> + </Route>Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx (3)
179-179: Clean up debug statements before the final pushLeaving
console.logstatements in your code might spill unnecessary details when you least expect it. Let's remove it to keep things running smoothly.
250-252: Offer assistance with responsive layoutI see you're looking for help with the height, gap, and
flexWrapin theStackcomponent. I can suggest tweaks to improve responsiveness and alignment.Would you like me to provide some recommendations to refine this layout?
283-286: Assist with selecting chart gradient coloursNot sure which colours to use for the gradient in your
AreaChart? Let's pick shades that harmonize with the theme and make the charts stand out.Would you like me to suggest some colour options?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Client/src/App.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/data.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.css(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/gradientUtils.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.css
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/data.js (1)
12-56: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo! These zero values are sus! And them IDs need some love! 🎯
The zero-initialized fields could be misleading in visualizations, and the ID generation could be more robust.
Let's verify if these fields are actually used:
Consider these improvements:
- Add realistic ranges for metrics:
cpu: {
- physical_core: 0,
- logical_core: 0,
- frequency: 0,
- temperature: 0,
+ physical_core: Math.floor(Math.random() * 8) + 1,
+ logical_core: Math.floor(Math.random() * 16) + 2,
+ frequency: Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 2000, // 2-3GHz
+ temperature: Math.floor(Math.random() * 30) + 40, // 40-70°C- More robust ID generation:
-_id: ObjectId(`6736f4f449e23954c8b89a${index.toString(16).padStart(2, "0")}`),
+_id: ObjectId(`${Date.now().toString(16)}${index.toString(16).padStart(4, "0")}`),Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx (1)
1-7: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
All the necessary dependencies are properly imported and organized. The separation between external libraries and internal utilities is clean.
Client/src/App.jsx (2)
42-42: Yo, this import's looking clean!
The import statement follows the project's established conventions for feature organization.
52-52: Admin prop wrapping looks solid, but let's double-check!
The HOC application maintains consistency with other admin-protected components in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
HOC usage is consistent - all admin components are properly wrapped
The verification shows that InfrastructureDetailsWithAdminProp follows the same pattern as other admin-protected components in the codebase. All sensitive components like Monitors, PageSpeed, Maintenance, Settings, and their respective detail views consistently use the withAdminProp HOC wrapper.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistent HOC usage across components
rg -A 1 "const \w+WithAdminProp = withAdminProp\(" ./Client/src/
Length of output: 827
| export const createGradient = ({ | ||
| id, | ||
| startColor, | ||
| endColor, | ||
| startOpacity = 0.8, | ||
| endOpacity = 0, | ||
| direction = "vertical", // or "horizontal" | ||
| }) => ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo! Add parameter validation for required props, dawg! 🍝
The function needs validation for required parameters (startColor and endColor) to prevent runtime errors. Also, id is marked as optional in docs but has no default value.
Here's a fix that's ready to drop:
export const createGradient = ({
- id,
+ id = "colorUv",
startColor,
endColor,
startOpacity = 0.8,
endOpacity = 0,
direction = "vertical", // or "horizontal"
-}) => (
+}) => {
+ if (!startColor || !endColor) {
+ throw new Error("startColor and endColor are required parameters");
+ }
+ return (📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const createGradient = ({ | |
| id, | |
| startColor, | |
| endColor, | |
| startOpacity = 0.8, | |
| endOpacity = 0, | |
| direction = "vertical", // or "horizontal" | |
| }) => ( | |
| export const createGradient = ({ | |
| id = "colorUv", | |
| startColor, | |
| endColor, | |
| startOpacity = 0.8, | |
| endOpacity = 0, | |
| direction = "vertical", // or "horizontal" | |
| }) => { | |
| if (!startColor || !endColor) { | |
| throw new Error("startColor and endColor are required parameters"); | |
| } | |
| return ( |
| CustomGauge.propTypes = { | ||
| progress: PropTypes.number, | ||
| radius: PropTypes.number, | ||
| color: PropTypes.string, | ||
| strokeWidth: PropTypes.number, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, let's lock down these PropTypes!
Make these PropTypes more strict to catch bugs early in development.
CustomGauge.propTypes = {
- progress: PropTypes.number,
- radius: PropTypes.number,
- color: PropTypes.string,
- strokeWidth: PropTypes.number,
+ progress: PropTypes.number.isRequired,
+ radius: PropTypes.number,
+ color: PropTypes.string,
+ strokeWidth: PropTypes.oneOf([PropTypes.number, PropTypes.string]),
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const CustomGauge = ({ | ||
| progress = 0, | ||
| radius = 60, | ||
| color = "#000000", | ||
| strokeWidth = 15, | ||
| }) => { | ||
| // Calculate the length of the stroke for the circle | ||
| const circumference = 2 * Math.PI * radius; | ||
| const totalSize = radius * 2 + strokeWidth * 2; // This is the total size of the SVG, needed for the viewBox | ||
| const strokeLength = (progress / 100) * circumference; | ||
| const [offset, setOffset] = useState(circumference); | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, we need some input validation up in here!
The progress value needs validation to prevent wonky gauge displays. Also, those calculations could be optimized with useMemo.
+ import { useMemo } from "react";
const CustomGauge = ({
progress = 0,
radius = 60,
color = "#000000",
strokeWidth = 15,
}) => {
+ if (progress < 0 || progress > 100) {
+ throw new Error("Progress must be between 0 and 100");
+ }
- const circumference = 2 * Math.PI * radius;
- const totalSize = radius * 2 + strokeWidth * 2;
- const strokeLength = (progress / 100) * circumference;
+ const { circumference, totalSize, strokeLength } = useMemo(() => ({
+ circumference: 2 * Math.PI * radius,
+ totalSize: radius * 2 + strokeWidth * 2,
+ strokeLength: (progress / 100) * (2 * Math.PI * radius)
+ }), [radius, strokeWidth, progress]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const CustomGauge = ({ | |
| progress = 0, | |
| radius = 60, | |
| color = "#000000", | |
| strokeWidth = 15, | |
| }) => { | |
| // Calculate the length of the stroke for the circle | |
| const circumference = 2 * Math.PI * radius; | |
| const totalSize = radius * 2 + strokeWidth * 2; // This is the total size of the SVG, needed for the viewBox | |
| const strokeLength = (progress / 100) * circumference; | |
| const [offset, setOffset] = useState(circumference); | |
| const theme = useTheme(); | |
| import { useMemo } from "react"; | |
| const CustomGauge = ({ | |
| progress = 0, | |
| radius = 60, | |
| color = "#000000", | |
| strokeWidth = 15, | |
| }) => { | |
| if (progress < 0 || progress > 100) { | |
| throw new Error("Progress must be between 0 and 100"); | |
| } | |
| const { circumference, totalSize, strokeLength } = useMemo(() => ({ | |
| circumference: 2 * Math.PI * radius, | |
| totalSize: radius * 2 + strokeWidth * 2, | |
| strokeLength: (progress / 100) * (2 * Math.PI * radius) | |
| }), [radius, strokeWidth, progress]); | |
| const [offset, setOffset] = useState(circumference); | |
| const theme = useTheme(); |
| <svg | ||
| viewBox={`0 0 ${totalSize} ${totalSize}`} | ||
| width={radius} | ||
| height={radius} | ||
| > | ||
| <circle | ||
| className="radial-chart-base" | ||
| stroke={theme.palette.background.fill} | ||
| strokeWidth={strokeWidth} | ||
| fill="none" | ||
| cx={totalSize / 2} // Center the circle | ||
| cy={totalSize / 2} // Center the circle | ||
| r={radius} | ||
| /> | ||
| <circle | ||
| className="radial-chart-progress" | ||
| stroke={color} | ||
| strokeWidth={strokeWidth} | ||
| strokeDasharray={`${circumference} ${circumference}`} | ||
| strokeDashoffset={offset} | ||
| strokeLinecap="round" | ||
| fill="none" | ||
| cx={totalSize / 2} | ||
| cy={totalSize / 2} | ||
| r={radius} | ||
| /> | ||
| </svg> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Let's make this accessible, fam!
The SVG needs ARIA attributes and a title for screen readers.
<svg
viewBox={`0 0 ${totalSize} ${totalSize}`}
width={radius}
height={radius}
+ role="img"
+ aria-label={`Progress gauge showing ${progress.toFixed(2)}%`}
>
+ <title>Progress Gauge</title>
<circle📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <svg | |
| viewBox={`0 0 ${totalSize} ${totalSize}`} | |
| width={radius} | |
| height={radius} | |
| > | |
| <circle | |
| className="radial-chart-base" | |
| stroke={theme.palette.background.fill} | |
| strokeWidth={strokeWidth} | |
| fill="none" | |
| cx={totalSize / 2} // Center the circle | |
| cy={totalSize / 2} // Center the circle | |
| r={radius} | |
| /> | |
| <circle | |
| className="radial-chart-progress" | |
| stroke={color} | |
| strokeWidth={strokeWidth} | |
| strokeDasharray={`${circumference} ${circumference}`} | |
| strokeDashoffset={offset} | |
| strokeLinecap="round" | |
| fill="none" | |
| cx={totalSize / 2} | |
| cy={totalSize / 2} | |
| r={radius} | |
| /> | |
| </svg> | |
| <svg | |
| viewBox={`0 0 ${totalSize} ${totalSize}`} | |
| width={radius} | |
| height={radius} | |
| role="img" | |
| aria-label={`Progress gauge showing ${progress.toFixed(2)}%`} | |
| > | |
| <title>Progress Gauge</title> | |
| <circle | |
| className="radial-chart-base" | |
| stroke={theme.palette.background.fill} | |
| strokeWidth={strokeWidth} | |
| fill="none" | |
| cx={totalSize / 2} // Center the circle | |
| cy={totalSize / 2} // Center the circle | |
| r={radius} | |
| /> | |
| <circle | |
| className="radial-chart-progress" | |
| stroke={color} | |
| strokeWidth={strokeWidth} | |
| strokeDasharray={`${circumference} ${circumference}`} | |
| strokeDashoffset={offset} | |
| strokeLinecap="round" | |
| fill="none" | |
| cx={totalSize / 2} | |
| cy={totalSize / 2} | |
| r={radius} | |
| /> | |
| </svg> |
| <ResponsiveContainer | ||
| width="100%" | ||
| height="80%" // FE team HELP! Why does this overflow if set to 100%? | ||
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, I heard you like responsive containers! Let me drop some knowledge about that height issue! 🎵
The height overflow when set to "100%" is a common issue with recharts' ResponsiveContainer. It occurs because the container needs a parent with a defined height.
Here are two solutions:
- Define an explicit height on the parent:
.chart-wrapper {
height: 400px; /* or any desired height */
}- Use aspect ratio instead:
<ResponsiveContainer
width="100%"
- height="80%"
+ aspect={2} // This will maintain 2:1 aspect ratio
>| customTooltip, | ||
| }) => { | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| const gradientId = `gradient-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 9)}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's make those gradient IDs more reliable! 🍝
Using Math.random() for gradient IDs could potentially cause duplicates. Also, these gradients should be cleaned up when the component unmounts.
Consider using a more robust approach:
+import { useId } from 'react';
+
const CustomAreaChart = ({ /* ... */ }) => {
const theme = useTheme();
- const gradientId = `gradient-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 9)}`;
+ const uniqueId = useId();
+ const gradientId = `gradient-${uniqueId}`;Also applies to: 103-109
| export const InfrastructureTooltip = ({ | ||
| active, | ||
| payload, | ||
| label, | ||
| yKey, | ||
| yIdx = -1, | ||
| yLabel, | ||
| dotColor, | ||
| }) => { | ||
| const uiTimezone = useSelector((state) => state.ui.timezone); | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| if (active && payload && payload.length) { | ||
| const [hardwareType, metric] = yKey.split("."); | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Box | ||
| className="area-tooltip" | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main, | ||
| border: 1, | ||
| borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, | ||
| borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, | ||
| py: theme.spacing(2), | ||
| px: theme.spacing(4), | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| <Typography | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, | ||
| fontSize: 12, | ||
| fontWeight: 500, | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| {formatDateWithTz(label, "ddd, MMMM D, YYYY, h:mm A", uiTimezone)} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| <Box mt={theme.spacing(1)}> | ||
| <Box | ||
| display="inline-block" | ||
| width={theme.spacing(4)} | ||
| height={theme.spacing(4)} | ||
| backgroundColor={dotColor} | ||
| sx={{ borderRadius: "50%" }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Stack | ||
| display="inline-flex" | ||
| direction="row" | ||
| justifyContent="space-between" | ||
| ml={theme.spacing(3)} | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| "& span": { | ||
| color: theme.palette.text.tertiary, | ||
| fontSize: 11, | ||
| fontWeight: 500, | ||
| }, | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| <Typography | ||
| component="span" | ||
| sx={{ opacity: 0.8 }} | ||
| > | ||
| {yIdx >= 0 | ||
| ? `${yLabel} ${payload[0].payload[hardwareType][yIdx][metric] * 100}%` | ||
| : `${yLabel} ${payload[0].payload[hardwareType][metric] * 100}%`} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| <Typography component="span"></Typography> | ||
| </Stack> | ||
| </Box> | ||
| {/* Display original value */} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| return null; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, this tooltip's got more layers than an onion! 🧅
Found a few things that need attention:
- There's an empty Typography component (line 152)
- There's a commented-out "Display original value" section
- The data transformation logic could be extracted
Let's clean this up:
+// Extract data transformation to a separate function
+const getMetricValue = (payload, hardwareType, metric, yIdx) => {
+ if (yIdx >= 0) {
+ return payload[0].payload[hardwareType][yIdx][metric] * 100;
+ }
+ return payload[0].payload[hardwareType][metric] * 100;
+};
export const InfrastructureTooltip = ({
// ... props
}) => {
// ... existing code ...
- <Typography component="span"></Typography>
{/* Display original value */}
// ... rest of the component
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export const PercentTick = ({ x, y, payload, index }) => { | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| if (index === 0) return null; | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Text | ||
| x={x - 20} | ||
| y={y} | ||
| textAnchor="middle" | ||
| fill={theme.palette.text.tertiary} | ||
| fontSize={11} | ||
| fontWeight={400} | ||
| > | ||
| {`${payload?.value * 100}%`} | ||
| </Text> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| PercentTick.propTypes = { | ||
| x: PropTypes.number, | ||
| y: PropTypes.number, | ||
| payload: PropTypes.object, | ||
| index: PropTypes.number, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Bruh, we got some magic numbers in here! 🎩
The component works, but let's make it more maintainable and performant:
- The hardcoded x-offset of
-20should be a prop or theme value - Like TzTick, this component could benefit from memoization
Here's the glow-up:
+const DEFAULT_X_OFFSET = -20;
-export const PercentTick = ({ x, y, payload, index }) => {
+export const PercentTick = React.memo(({ x, y, payload, index, xOffset = DEFAULT_X_OFFSET }) => {
const theme = useTheme();
if (index === 0) return null;
return (
<Text
- x={x - 20}
+ x={x + xOffset}
// ... rest of the component
>
{`${payload?.value * 100}%`}
</Text>
);
-};
+});
PercentTick.propTypes = {
// ... existing props
+ xOffset: PropTypes.number,
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <GaugeBox | ||
| value={monitor.checks[0].cpu.usage_percent * 100} | ||
| heading={"Memory Usage"} | ||
| metricOne={"Used"} | ||
| valueOne={formatBytes(monitor.checks[0].memory.used_bytes)} | ||
| metricTwo={"Total"} | ||
| valueTwo={formatBytes(monitor.checks[0].memory.total_bytes)} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix data source in 'Memory Usage' GaugeBox
The 'Memory Usage' gauge is currently using monitor.checks[0].cpu.usage_percent * 100 as its value, which taps into CPU data. Let's switch it to monitor.checks[0].memory.usage_percent * 100 to reflect actual memory usage.
| {`Disk${idx} usage`} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| <AreaChart | ||
| data={monitor?.checks ?? []} | ||
| dataKey={`disk[${idx}].usage_percent`} | ||
| xKey="createdAt" | ||
| yKey={`disk[${idx}].usage_percent`} // We are looking for the usage_percent of the current disk in the array | ||
| customTooltip={({ active, payload, label }) => ( | ||
| <InfrastructureTooltip | ||
| label={label} // label must be a string | ||
| yKey={`disk.usage_percent`} | ||
| yLabel="Disk Usage" | ||
| yIdx={idx} | ||
| active={active} | ||
| payload={payload} | ||
| /> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent indexing in disk usage charts
In your disk usage AreaChart, the yKey passed to InfrastructureTooltip is set to disk.usage_percent. To align with the data structure, it should be disk[${idx}].usage_percent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx (3)
21-33: Consider handling large numbers more preciselyThe current implementation might lose precision with very large byte values. Consider using BigInt for values larger than Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER.
const formatBytes = (bytes) => { + const MAX_SAFE_BYTES = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; if (typeof bytes !== "number") return "0 GB"; if (bytes === 0) return "0 GB"; + if (bytes > MAX_SAFE_BYTES) { + return `${(BigInt(bytes) / BigInt(1024 * 1024 * 1024)).toString()} GB`; + }
179-179: Remove debug console.log statementDebug statements should be removed before production deployment.
-console.log(monitor?.checks?.[0]?.memory?.total_bytes);
250-252: Address styling TODOs and implement responsive designSeveral styling concerns need attention:
- Hard-coded height values
- Unclear gradient color choices
- Flexbox wrapping implementation
Consider:
- Using CSS Grid for layout instead of flexbox wrapping
- Implementing a proper color system for charts
- Using responsive units (vh/vw) for heights
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track these styling improvements?
Also applies to: 285-286, 312-316
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx (1)
337-337: Fix disk usage yKey in InfrastructureTooltip
This issue was previously identified and still needs to be addressed.
-yKey={`disk.usage_percent`}
+yKey={`disk[${idx}].usage_percent`}| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const fetchData = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const response = await axios.get("/dummyData.json", { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| setMonitor(response.data.data); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error(error); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| fetchData(); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and remove debug code
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Error handling only logs to console
- No loading state management
- No error state UI feedback
useEffect(() => {
+ const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);
+ const [error, setError] = useState(null);
const fetchData = async () => {
try {
+ setIsLoading(true);
+ setError(null);
const response = await axios.get("/dummyData.json", {
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Cache-Control": "no-cache",
},
});
setMonitor(response.data.data);
} catch (error) {
- console.error(error);
+ setError(error.message);
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
}
};
fetchData();
}, []);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
ajhollid
force-pushed
the
feat/fe/infrastructure-details
branch
from
fac680f to
7223ca3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Server/index.js (1)
106-109: Error handling's weak, but the code is ready! 🎯The error handling could use some love to match the robust error logging pattern used elsewhere in the codebase.
Here's a more consistent approach:
- return res.status(500).json({ message: error.message }); + logger.error({ + message: error.message, + service: SERVICE_NAME, + method: "getDummyData", + stack: error.stack, + }); + return res.status(500).json({ message: "Failed to fetch infrastructure data" });Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx (1)
21-33: Yo dawg, let's make those byte conversions more precise!The GB conversion could benefit from more precise decimal handling for better readability.
Here's a suggestion to improve precision:
- return `${Number(GB.toFixed(0))} GB`; + return `${Number(GB.toFixed(2))} GB`;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/details/index.jsx(1 hunks)Server/index.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Server/index.js (1)
95-110: Verify the development data source! 👀
Using a public gist for development data could be risky if the gist is modified or becomes unavailable. Consider alternatives:
- Local JSON file in the repository
- Mock service within the development environment
- Dedicated development API endpoint
Let's check if this gist is being used elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Yo! That gist URL is flying solo in Server/index.js! 🍝
The verification shows this gist URL is only used in one spot - Server/index.js. This makes it a straightforward fix to swap out for a more reliable development data source.
Recommendations to keep it steady:
- Drop a local JSON file in the repo (like
Server/data/dummy-data.json) - Update the endpoint to read from that local file instead
- Add a comment explaining it's for development purposes only
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to the gist URL
rg -l "9afa39410c7bbf52cc905f285a2225bf"
# Search for other potential hard-coded URLs
rg -l "gist.githubusercontent.com"
Length of output: 107
| const response = await axios.get( | ||
| "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ajhollid/9afa39410c7bbf52cc905f285a2225bf/raw/429a231a3559ebc95f6f488ed2c766bd7d6f46e5/dummyData.json", | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Mom's spaghetti! That URL needs to be configurable! 🍝
There's vomit on my sweater seeing this hard-coded URL to a public gist. This should be moved to a configuration file or environment variable for better maintainability and security.
Consider this approach:
+ // Add to .env file
+ DUMMY_DATA_URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/...
+ // Add to config.js
+ export const DUMMY_DATA_URL = process.env.DUMMY_DATA_URL;
- const response = await axios.get(
- "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ajhollid/9afa39410c7bbf52cc905f285a2225bf/raw/429a231a3559ebc95f6f488ed2c766bd7d6f46e5/dummyData.json",
+ const response = await axios.get(
+ config.DUMMY_DATA_URL,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| app.use("/api/v1/dummy-data", async (req, res) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const response = await axios.get( | ||
| "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ajhollid/9afa39410c7bbf52cc905f285a2225bf/raw/429a231a3559ebc95f6f488ed2c766bd7d6f46e5/dummyData.json", | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
| return res.status(200).json(response.data); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| return res.status(500).json({ message: error.message }); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo! This endpoint needs some security love! 🔒
My knees are weak thinking about this unprotected endpoint! Just like other sensitive routes in the codebase (e.g., /api/v1/monitors, /api/v1/checks), this one should be protected with the verifyJWT middleware.
Apply this diff to secure the route:
- app.use("/api/v1/dummy-data", async (req, res) => {
+ app.use("/api/v1/dummy-data", verifyJWT, async (req, res) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| app.use("/api/v1/dummy-data", async (req, res) => { | |
| try { | |
| const response = await axios.get( | |
| "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ajhollid/9afa39410c7bbf52cc905f285a2225bf/raw/429a231a3559ebc95f6f488ed2c766bd7d6f46e5/dummyData.json", | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | |
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| return res.status(200).json(response.data); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return res.status(500).json({ message: error.message }); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| app.use("/api/v1/dummy-data", verifyJWT, async (req, res) => { | |
| try { | |
| const response = await axios.get( | |
| "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ajhollid/9afa39410c7bbf52cc905f285a2225bf/raw/429a231a3559ebc95f6f488ed2c766bd7d6f46e5/dummyData.json", | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | |
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| return res.status(200).json(response.data); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return res.status(500).json({ message: error.message }); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| height={300} // FE team HELP! | ||
| gap={theme.spacing(8)} // FE team HELP! | ||
| flexWrap="wrap" // //FE team HELP! Better way to do this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Let me drop some knowledge on those FE team questions!
Here's how to address your styling concerns:
-
For the height/spacing issue:
- Use CSS Grid instead of flexbox for better responsive layout
- Replace fixed height with aspect ratio
-
For the chart colors:
- Use theme's alpha values for gradients
- Maintain consistent color schemes across charts
Here's how to implement these improvements:
- height={300} // FE team HELP!
- gap={theme.spacing(8)} // FE team HELP!
- flexWrap="wrap" // //FE team HELP! Better way to do this?
+ sx={{
+ display: 'grid',
+ gridTemplateColumns: 'repeat(auto-fit, minmax(400px, 1fr))',
+ gap: theme.spacing(8),
+ '& > *': {
+ aspectRatio: '16/9',
+ }
+ }}
// For chart colors
- gradientStartColor={theme.palette.primary.main}
- gradientEndColor="#ffffff"
+ gradientStartColor={alpha(theme.palette.primary.main, 0.8)}
+ gradientEndColor={alpha(theme.palette.primary.main, 0.1)}Also applies to: 284-285, 311-315
| {monitor.checks[0].disk.map((disk, idx) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <GaugeBox | ||
| key={disk._id} | ||
| value={disk.usage_percent * 100} | ||
| heading={`Disk${idx} usage`} | ||
| metricOne={"Used"} | ||
| valueOne={formatBytes(disk.total_bytes - disk.free_bytes)} | ||
| metricTwo={"Total"} | ||
| valueTwo={formatBytes(disk.total_bytes)} | ||
| /> | ||
| ); | ||
| })} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Heads up! Let's make that disk array access bulletproof!
The disk array access needs additional safety checks to prevent runtime errors.
Add these safety checks:
- {monitor.checks[0].disk.map((disk, idx) => {
+ {Array.isArray(monitor?.checks?.[0]?.disk) && monitor.checks[0].disk.map((disk, idx) => {
- {monitor?.checks?.[0]?.disk?.map((disk, idx) => {
+ {Array.isArray(monitor?.checks?.[0]?.disk) && monitor?.checks?.[0]?.disk?.map((disk, idx) => {Also applies to: 318-352
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const fetchData = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, that localhost URL ain't gonna fly in prod!
The hardcoded localhost URL needs to be replaced with an environment variable.
Replace with:
- const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", {
+ const response = await axios.get(`${process.env.REACT_APP_API_URL}/api/v1/dummy-data`, {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", { | |
| const response = await axios.get(`${process.env.REACT_APP_API_URL}/api/v1/dummy-data`, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great work, looks pretty good! I'm able to show the detail page with dummy data, I think it's ready to be merged , one question : I see tooltips like attached with very long float percentage, is this necessary?
Screencast from 2024-11-19 15-26-19.webm
| width="100%" | ||
| height="80%" // FE team HELP! Why does this overflow if set to 100%? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What sort of layout do you want, Alex?
Right now they are wrapping to the next line, do you want them all side by side like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According to the figma design they should wrap down, looks like there should be a maximum of two graphs per line
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx (3)
18-34: Yo dawg, let's make this tick component lit with some performance gains! 🔥The component's clean, but it's re-rendering like it's at a dance party! Let's wrap it in React.memo to keep it chill when props haven't changed.
+import React from 'react'; -export const TzTick = ({ x, y, payload, index }) => { +export const TzTick = React.memo(({ x, y, payload, index }) => { // ... existing code ... -}; +});
152-152: Cleanup needed - got some leftover code here! 🧹There's an empty Typography component and a commented section that's just taking up space. Either implement them or remove them to keep the code clean.
-<Typography component="span"></Typography> -{/* Display original value */}Also applies to: 155-155
105-112: These styles are taking up more space than my mom's spaghetti! 🍝Let's extract these styles to a separate constant to keep the component clean.
+const tooltipStyles = (theme) => ({ + backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main, + border: 1, + borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, + borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, + py: theme.spacing(2), + px: theme.spacing(4), +}); <Box className="area-tooltip" - sx={{ - backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main, - border: 1, - borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, - borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, - py: theme.spacing(2), - px: theme.spacing(4), - }} + sx={tooltipStyles(theme)} >Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/index.jsx (2)
140-155: You only get one shot to define PropTypes rightPalms are sweaty, but let's make these PropTypes steady. The current definitions for
xTick,yTick, andcustomTooltipmight be too restrictive. Recharts accepts these props as functions, elements, or objects.Consider updating them to:
xTick: PropTypes.oneOfType([ PropTypes.func, PropTypes.element, PropTypes.object, ]), yTick: PropTypes.oneOfType([ PropTypes.func, PropTypes.element, PropTypes.object, ]), customTooltip: PropTypes.oneOfType([ PropTypes.func, PropTypes.element, ]),Don't miss your chance to tighten this; opportunity comes once in a lifetime.
99-105: Lose yourself in the code, but check thatdataKeyKnees weak, arms are heavy, but let's focus steady. The
XAxisandYAxiscomponents don't typically require adataKeyprop unless you're customizing tick formatting or labeling.Snap back to reality—if
dataKeyisn't serving a specific purpose here, consider removing it to simplify your axes:<XAxis - dataKey={xKey} {...(xTick && { tick: xTick })} /> <YAxis - dataKey={yKey} {...(yTick && { tick: yTick })} />Seize the moment; simplifying could make your chart flow smoother.
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (2)
315-317: Layout feels heavy—let's lighten it up for better responsiveness.I see you're seeking help with the layout in the
Stackcomponent. Switching to Material-UI'sGridcomponent might make the design more flexible and easier to manage.Would you like assistance in refactoring the layout for improved responsiveness?
273-274: Keep the colours consistent—unify chart styles for a better user experience.Using consistent colour schemes across your charts helps users focus and understand the data better. Align chart colours with your theme or establish a consistent palette.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Client/src/App.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/AreaChart/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Client/src/App.jsx
- Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (1)
201-213: Stay ahead of undefined data—ensure availability before rendering.
Accessing properties like monitor?.checks[0]?.cpu?.physical_core might result in undefined values if the data isn't loaded yet. To keep things running smoothly, consider adding fallback values or conditionally rendering components based on data availability.
| {yIdx >= 0 | ||
| ? `${yLabel} ${(payload[0].payload[hardwareType][yIdx][metric] * 100).toFixed(2)}%` | ||
| : `${yLabel} ${(payload[0].payload[hardwareType][metric] * 100).toFixed(2)}%`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, this ternary's making my head spin! 🌀
Let's clean up this spaghetti code with a helper function, fam!
+const getFormattedValue = (payload, hardwareType, metric, yIdx, yLabel) => {
+ const value = yIdx >= 0
+ ? payload[0].payload[hardwareType][yIdx][metric]
+ : payload[0].payload[hardwareType][metric];
+ return `${yLabel} ${(value * 100).toFixed(2)}%`;
+};
<Typography component="span" sx={{ opacity: 0.8 }}>
- {yIdx >= 0
- ? `${yLabel} ${(payload[0].payload[hardwareType][yIdx][metric] * 100).toFixed(2)}%`
- : `${yLabel} ${(payload[0].payload[hardwareType][metric] * 100).toFixed(2)}%`}
+ {getFormattedValue(payload, hardwareType, metric, yIdx, yLabel)}
</Typography>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| setMonitor(response.data.data); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Don't let hardcoded URLs hold you back—move the API endpoint to configuration.
Hardcoding "http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data" might cause issues when deploying to different environments. Consider using environment variables or configuration files to manage API endpoints flexibly.
| type: "memory", | ||
| value: monitor?.checks[0]?.memory?.usage_percent * 100, | ||
| heading: "Memory Usage", | ||
| metricOne: "Used", | ||
| valueOne: formatBytes(monitor?.checks[0]?.memory?.used_bytes), | ||
| metricTwo: "Total", | ||
| valueTwo: formatBytes(monitor?.checks[0]?.memory?.total_bytes), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid crashes from undefined data—handle potential missing values in calculations.
When calculating value in gaugeBoxConfigs, if usage_percent is undefined, multiplying by 100 will result in NaN. To keep the app steady, implement default values or checks to prevent unexpected behaviour.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (3)
224-253: Knees weak, arms are heavy - let's optimize these configs! 🍝The gauge box configurations could use some performance and safety improvements:
+ const firstCheck = monitor?.checks?.[0]; + const gaugeBoxConfigs = useMemo(() => [ { type: "memory", - value: monitor?.checks[0]?.memory?.usage_percent * 100, + value: firstCheck?.memory?.usage_percent * 100 ?? 0, heading: "Memory Usage", metricOne: "Used", - valueOne: formatBytes(monitor?.checks[0]?.memory?.used_bytes), + valueOne: formatBytes(firstCheck?.memory?.used_bytes), metricTwo: "Total", - valueTwo: formatBytes(monitor?.checks[0]?.memory?.total_bytes), + valueTwo: formatBytes(firstCheck?.memory?.total_bytes), }, // ... similar changes for CPU config - ...(monitor?.checks[0]?.disk ?? []).map((disk, idx) => ({ + ...(firstCheck?.disk ?? []).map((disk, idx) => ({ // ... disk config })), -]; +], [firstCheck]);
340-351: There's vomit on his sweater already - let's clean up this layout! 🍝Instead of using Flex with manual calculations, we can use Grid for a cleaner layout:
<Stack - direction={"row"} - height={chartContainerHeight} - gap={theme.spacing(8)} - flexWrap="wrap" sx={{ + display: 'grid', + gridTemplateColumns: 'repeat(auto-fit, minmax(400px, 1fr))', + gap: theme.spacing(8), + height: chartContainerHeight, - "& > *": { - flexBasis: `calc(50% - ${theme.spacing(8)})`, - maxWidth: `calc(50% - ${theme.spacing(8)})`, - }, }} >
162-162: Snap back to reality - let's optimize performance! 🍝The component could benefit from memoization to prevent unnecessary re-renders:
- Memoize the component:
-const InfrastructureDetails = () => { +const InfrastructureDetails = memo(() => { // component implementation -}; +});
- Consider using
useMemofor complex calculations anduseCallbackfor event handlers.
| <Box> | ||
| <PulseDot color={statusColor[determineState(monitor)]} /> | ||
| </Box> | ||
| <Typography | ||
| alignSelf="end" | ||
| component="h1" | ||
| variant="h1" | ||
| > | ||
| {monitor.name} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| <Typography alignSelf="end">{monitor.url || "..."}</Typography> | ||
| <Box sx={{ flexGrow: 1 }} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Lose yourself in accessibility - let's make it inclusive! 🍝
The status indicator and heading section needs accessibility improvements:
-<Box>
+<Box role="status" aria-label={`Monitor status: ${determineState(monitor)}`}>
<PulseDot color={statusColor[determineState(monitor)]} />
</Box>
<Typography
alignSelf="end"
component="h1"
variant="h1"
+ aria-label={`Monitor name: ${monitor.name}`}
>
{monitor.name}
</Typography>
-<Typography alignSelf="end">{monitor.url || "..."}</Typography>
+<Typography alignSelf="end" aria-label={`Monitor URL: ${monitor.url || "not set"}`}>
+ {monitor.url || "..."}
+</Typography>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Box> | |
| <PulseDot color={statusColor[determineState(monitor)]} /> | |
| </Box> | |
| <Typography | |
| alignSelf="end" | |
| component="h1" | |
| variant="h1" | |
| > | |
| {monitor.name} | |
| </Typography> | |
| <Typography alignSelf="end">{monitor.url || "..."}</Typography> | |
| <Box sx={{ flexGrow: 1 }} /> | |
| <Box role="status" aria-label={`Monitor status: ${determineState(monitor)}`}> | |
| <PulseDot color={statusColor[determineState(monitor)]} /> | |
| </Box> | |
| <Typography | |
| alignSelf="end" | |
| component="h1" | |
| variant="h1" | |
| aria-label={`Monitor name: ${monitor.name}`} | |
| > | |
| {monitor.name} | |
| </Typography> | |
| <Typography alignSelf="end" aria-label={`Monitor URL: ${monitor.url || "not set"}`}> | |
| {monitor.url || "..."} | |
| </Typography> | |
| <Box sx={{ flexGrow: 1 }} /> |
| const formatBytes = (bytes) => { | ||
| if (typeof bytes !== "number") return "0 GB"; | ||
| if (bytes === 0) return "0 GB"; | ||
|
|
||
| const GB = bytes / (1024 * 1024 * 1024); | ||
| const MB = bytes / (1024 * 1024); | ||
|
|
||
| if (GB >= 1) { | ||
| return `${Number(GB.toFixed(0))} GB`; | ||
| } else { | ||
| return `${Number(MB.toFixed(0))} MB`; | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo! Let's make this formatBytes function bulletproof! 🍝
The function needs some defensive programming love to handle edge cases:
const formatBytes = (bytes) => {
+ if (!Number.isFinite(bytes) || bytes < 0) return "0 GB";
if (typeof bytes !== "number") return "0 GB";
if (bytes === 0) return "0 GB";
const GB = bytes / (1024 * 1024 * 1024);
const MB = bytes / (1024 * 1024);
if (GB >= 1) {
- return `${Number(GB.toFixed(0))} GB`;
+ return `${Number(GB.toFixed(GB < 10 ? 1 : 0))} GB`;
} else {
- return `${Number(MB.toFixed(0))} MB`;
+ return `${Number(MB.toFixed(MB < 10 ? 1 : 0))} MB`;
}
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const formatBytes = (bytes) => { | |
| if (typeof bytes !== "number") return "0 GB"; | |
| if (bytes === 0) return "0 GB"; | |
| const GB = bytes / (1024 * 1024 * 1024); | |
| const MB = bytes / (1024 * 1024); | |
| if (GB >= 1) { | |
| return `${Number(GB.toFixed(0))} GB`; | |
| } else { | |
| return `${Number(MB.toFixed(0))} MB`; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| const formatBytes = (bytes) => { | |
| if (!Number.isFinite(bytes) || bytes < 0) return "0 GB"; | |
| if (typeof bytes !== "number") return "0 GB"; | |
| if (bytes === 0) return "0 GB"; | |
| const GB = bytes / (1024 * 1024 * 1024); | |
| const MB = bytes / (1024 * 1024); | |
| if (GB >= 1) { | |
| return `${Number(GB.toFixed(GB < 10 ? 1 : 0))} GB`; | |
| } else { | |
| return `${Number(MB.toFixed(MB < 10 ? 1 : 0))} MB`; | |
| } | |
| }; |
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const fetchData = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| setMonitor(response.data.data); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error(error); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| fetchData(); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Mom's spaghetti moment - we need better error handling! 🍝
The data fetching logic needs some love:
- Add loading state management
- Improve error handling beyond console.log
+ const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);
+ const [error, setError] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
const fetchData = async () => {
try {
+ setIsLoading(true);
+ setError(null);
const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", {
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Cache-Control": "no-cache",
},
});
setMonitor(response.data.data);
} catch (error) {
- console.error(error);
+ setError(error.message || 'Failed to fetch monitor data');
+ // Consider using a toast notification here
} finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
}
};
fetchData();
}, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const fetchData = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", { | |
| headers: { | |
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | |
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| setMonitor(response.data.data); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error(error); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| fetchData(); | |
| }, []); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); | |
| const [error, setError] = useState(null); | |
| const fetchData = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| setIsLoading(true); | |
| setError(null); | |
| const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:5000/api/v1/dummy-data", { | |
| headers: { | |
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | |
| "Cache-Control": "no-cache", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| setMonitor(response.data.data); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| setError(error.message || 'Failed to fetch monitor data'); | |
| // Consider using a toast notification here | |
| } finally { | |
| setIsLoading(false); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| fetchData(); | |
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx (3)
18-34: Yo dawg, let's make this TzTick component fresh! 🎵The component's looking solid, but we can make it even better with these improvements:
- That hardcoded y-offset of +10 should be a prop or theme value
- Wrap it in React.memo to prevent unnecessary re-renders when parent updates
+const DEFAULT_Y_OFFSET = 10; -export const TzTick = ({ x, y, payload, index }) => { +export const TzTick = React.memo(({ x, y, payload, index, yOffset = DEFAULT_Y_OFFSET }) => { const theme = useTheme(); const uiTimezone = useSelector((state) => state.ui.timezone); return ( <Text x={x} - y={y + 10} + y={y + yOffset} textAnchor="middle" fill={theme.palette.text.tertiary} fontSize={11} fontWeight={400} > {formatDateWithTz(payload?.value, "h:mm a", uiTimezone)} </Text> ); -}; +});
168-168: Clean up these leftovers, they're making me nervous! 🧹Found some code that needs cleanup:
- Empty Typography component on line 168
- Commented out code on line 171
- <Typography component="span"></Typography> - {/* Display original value */}Also applies to: 171-171
178-190: Let's make these props as strict as mom's spaghetti recipe! 🍝Some props should be marked as required since they're essential for the tooltip to function correctly:
yKeyyLabeldotColorInfrastructureTooltip.propTypes = { active: PropTypes.bool, payload: PropTypes.array, label: PropTypes.oneOfType([ PropTypes.instanceOf(Date), PropTypes.string, PropTypes.number, ]), - yKey: PropTypes.string, + yKey: PropTypes.string.isRequired, yIdx: PropTypes.number, - yLabel: PropTypes.string, - dotColor: PropTypes.string, + yLabel: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + dotColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, };
| const getFormattedPercentage = (value) => { | ||
| if (typeof value !== "number") return value; | ||
| return `${(value * 100).toFixed(2)}.%`; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ope! There's a sneaky typo in that percentage format! 🍝
There's an extra dot in the percentage format string that's gonna make our numbers look weird.
- return `${(value * 100).toFixed(2)}.%`;
+ return `${(value * 100).toFixed(2)}%`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const getFormattedPercentage = (value) => { | |
| if (typeof value !== "number") return value; | |
| return `${(value * 100).toFixed(2)}.%`; | |
| }; | |
| const getFormattedPercentage = (value) => { | |
| if (typeof value !== "number") return value; | |
| return `${(value * 100).toFixed(2)}%`; | |
| }; |
This PR is a rough implementation of the Infrasctrucutre Monitor page.
I am by no means a front end expert so FE team please fix my mistakes 😂 I've tagged things I'm not sure about with
FE team HELP!, pleasctrl-fthrough the file and see if you can make things better.Specific things I could use help with:
I also had to include the
AreaChartand the SVG based Gauge into this PR because I needed to use them. We can either review them here with this PR or in their own PRs, either is fine./infrastrucructure/:monitorId. You can use any ID for:monitorIdfor now