fix: integrate TextInput #1202
fix: integrate TextInput #1202
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
93-111: Mom's spaghetti... I mean, solid implementation! 🍝The new props are properly integrated into the TextField component. The implementation maintains clean prop forwarding and follows Material-UI conventions.
Consider memoizing the
sxstyles to prevent unnecessary recalculations:+const useMemoizedSx = (theme, type, maxWidth) => + useMemo(() => getSx(theme, type, maxWidth), + [theme, type, maxWidth]); const TextInput = forwardRef(({...}) => { const theme = useTheme(); + const sx = useMemoizedSx(theme, type, maxWidth); return ( ... - sx={getSx(theme, type, maxWidth)} + sx={sx}
122-136: Knees weak, arms heavy... but these PropTypes are steady! 💪The PropTypes are well-defined, especially marking
idas required.Consider adding more specific prop types for better type safety:
- onBlur: PropTypes.func, + onBlur: PropTypes.func.isRequired, - value: PropTypes.string, + value: PropTypes.oneOfType([ + PropTypes.string, + PropTypes.number + ]),Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx (1)
68-68: Simplify that error handling, make your knees less weak!The ternary expression for the error prop can be simplified.
-error={errors[fieldId] ? true : false} +error={!!errors[fieldId]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 68-68: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (6)
15-15: Yo! Remove unused Field importThe Field component import appears to be unused since it's being replaced with TextInput throughout the component. Let's keep our imports clean, dawg! 🧹
-import Field from "../../../Components/Inputs/Field";
242-252: Simplify boolean expressions in error prop, fam! 🎯The error prop can be simplified by removing the ternary operator. Let's make it cleaner!
-error={errors["url"] ? true : false} +error={!!errors["url"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 250-250: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
253-262: Inconsistent error prop handling, my dude! 🤔The error prop handling for the name field differs from url and secret fields. Let's keep it consistent across all TextInput components.
-error={errors["name"]} +error={!!errors["name"]} +helperText={errors["name"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 250-250: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
263-272: Same energy needed here - simplify that boolean expression! 💪Let's keep the same pattern for the secret field's error handling.
-error={errors["secret"] ? true : false} +error={!!errors["secret"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 270-270: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
359-367: Clean up that commented code, homie! 🧹If we're moving away from Field components, we should remove this commented-out code block to keep things fresh and clean.
- /* <Field - type={"number"} - id="monitor-retries" - label="Maximum retries before the service is marked as down" - value={infrastructureMonitor.url} - onChange={handleChange} - onBlur={handleBlur} - error={errors["url"]} - /> */
Yo, we found a commented-out Field component! Time to clean up! 🧹
The Field component is still imported but only appears in a commented-out section. Let's remove:
- The unused Field import on line 13
- The commented-out Field component in the advanced settings section
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-394: Let's verify all Field components are replaced, yo! 🔍Let's make sure we didn't miss any Field components in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining Field component usage rg -l "Field" | grep -v "Field.jsx" # Search for TextInput component usage to ensure proper migration rg "<TextInput"Length of output: 2100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual Field component usage in the specific file rg -A 5 "import.*Field" Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx # And check if there are any remaining Field component usages in the file rg "<Field" Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsxLength of output: 537
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 250-250: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx(4 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx
[error] 68-68: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx
[error] 250-250: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 270-270: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx (1)
61-67: Mom's spaghetti approves these changes! 🍝
The TextInput implementation with the new props (id, onBlur, disabled) looks clean and follows the PR objectives. The maxWidth constraint using CSS variable is a nice touch for consistent styling.
Let's make sure that CSS variable exists:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the CSS variable is legit! 🍝
The --env-var-width-4 CSS variable is properly defined in Client/src/index.css with a value of 100px and is already being used in other components like Field. The TextInput's maxWidth constraint is solid and consistent with the existing styling system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the CSS variable is defined in any CSS/SCSS files
rg --type css "env-var-width-4"
Length of output: 160
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (1)
301-302: Spittin' straight facts in these notifications! 📢
The notification message is clear and concise. Nice work on improving the user guidance!
| id, | ||
| type, | ||
| value, | ||
| placeholder, | ||
| isRequired, | ||
| isOptional, | ||
| optionalLabel, | ||
| onChange, | ||
| onBlur, | ||
| error = false, | ||
| helperText = null, | ||
| startAdornment = null, | ||
| endAdornment = null, | ||
| label = null, | ||
| maxWidth = "100%", | ||
| disabled = false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Yo dawg, we got some TextField accessibility issues to address! 🚨
I'm nervous but I gotta tell ya - we found a TextField in TeamPanel.jsx that's missing the required id prop. Here's what needs fixing:
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx: Add anidprop to the TextField componentClient/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx: Make sure the spread params include anid
The TextInput component itself is properly implemented with the required id prop, but we need to ensure all TextField instances across the codebase follow the same accessibility standards.
🔗 Analysis chain
Yo, these props are fire! 🔥 Just one accessibility thing to double-check.
The new props look solid, especially making id required - that's crucial for accessibility. The onBlur and disabled props with their default values are well-implemented.
Let's make sure we're using these IDs consistently:
The previous pattern didn't work well with ast-grep, so I'm using ripgrep to search for TextField usage with id prop, and also checking how TextInput is being used throughout the codebase. This will help us verify if the id prop is being used consistently.
Yo, my hands are shaky on the keyboard, but we gotta make sure we're catching all TextField usages in the codebase! The previous commands didn't work because of the file extension, so let's try with .js instead. This will help us verify if the id prop is being passed consistently.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for TextField usage without id prop
ast-grep --pattern 'TextField {
$$$
id={$_}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find TextField usage
rg -U "TextField.*id=" --type jsx
# Also check the actual TextInput component implementation
rg -U "TextInput.*id=" --type jsx
# And let's see the full TextInput component to understand the context better
cat Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx
Length of output: 3009
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with js extension since jsx wasn't recognized
rg -U "TextField.*id=" --type js
# Also search for TextInput usage
rg -U "TextInput.*id=" --type js
# Let's also check if there are any TextFields without id
rg -U "<TextField" -A 5 --type js
Length of output: 2311
| import Field from "../../../../Components/Inputs/Field"; | ||
| import TextInput from "../../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, you've got an unused import hanging around!
The Field import on line 2 isn't being used anymore since we've switched to TextInput. Let's keep it clean and remove that unused import.
-import Field from "../../../../Components/Inputs/Field";
import TextInput from "../../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import Field from "../../../../Components/Inputs/Field"; | |
| import TextInput from "../../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; | |
| import TextInput from "../../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; |
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR aims to enhance the user interface by integrating the
TextInputcomponent into the create infrastructure monitor page, replacing the existingFieldcomponent. This change aligns with the goal of unifying input components and improving user experience. - Key components modified:
TextInputcomponentCreateMonitorpageCustomThresholdcomponent
- Impact assessment: The change affects how input fields are rendered and handled across the create infrastructure monitor page, ensuring consistent input handling and validation.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The
TextInputcomponent is used across multiple pages, so any changes here will affect all instances. The business logic for creating infrastructure monitors is maintained, and the data flow between the input fields and the state is correctly managed.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The
TextInputcomponent now exposesid,onBlur, anddisabledprops, enhancing its flexibility and usability. The component uses Material-UI'sTextField, ensuring consistent styling and behavior. - Component interactions: The
TextInputcomponent is used in theCreateMonitorpage andCustomThresholdcomponent, replacing theFieldcomponent. - Integration points: The
TextInputcomponent is integrated into the create infrastructure monitor page, affecting how input fields are rendered and handled.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx - TextInput
- Submitted PR Code:
const TextInput = forwardRef( ( { id, type, value, placeholder, isRequired, isOptional, optionalLabel, onChange, onBlur, error = false, helperText = null, startAdornment = null, endAdornment = null, label = null, maxWidth = "100%", disabled = false, }, ref ) => { const [fieldType, setFieldType] = useState(type); const theme = useTheme(); return ( <Stack> <Typography component="h3" fontSize={"var(--env-var-font-size-medium)"} color={theme.palette.text.secondary} fontWeight={500} > {label} {isRequired && <Required />} {isOptional && <Optional optionalLabel={optionalLabel} />} </Typography> <TextField id={id} type={fieldType} value={value} placeholder={placeholder} onChange={onChange} onBlur={onBlur} error={error} helperText={helperText} inputRef={ref} sx={getSx(theme, type, maxWidth)} slotProps={{ input: { startAdornment: startAdornment, endAdornment: endAdornment ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { fieldType, setFieldType }) : null, }, }} disabled={disabled} /> </Stack> ); } );
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
TextInputcomponent is now more flexible with the addition ofid,onBlur, anddisabledprops. - The component uses Material-UI's
TextField, ensuring consistent styling and behavior. - Error handling is managed through
errorandhelperTextprops. - The
disabledprop ensures the input field is only editable under specific conditions.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The
errorprop should be consistently mapped to a boolean value to avoid any unexpected behavior. - The
helperTextprop should be conditionally rendered based on theerrorstate to improve user experience.
- The
- Cross-component impact:
- The
TextInputcomponent is used across multiple pages, so any changes here will affect all instances.
- The
- Business logic considerations:
- Ensuring consistency in input handling and validation is crucial for maintaining a smooth user experience.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const TextInput = forwardRef( ( { id, type, value, placeholder, isRequired, isOptional, optionalLabel, onChange, onBlur, error = false, helperText = null, startAdornment = null, endAdornment = null, label = null, maxWidth = "100%", disabled = false, }, ref ) => { const [fieldType, setFieldType] = useState(type); const theme = useTheme(); return ( <Stack> <Typography component="h3" fontSize={"var(--env-var-font-size-medium)"} color={theme.palette.text.secondary} fontWeight={500} > {label} {isRequired && <Required />} {isOptional && <Optional optionalLabel={optionalLabel} />} </Typography> <TextField id={id} type={fieldType} value={value} placeholder={placeholder} onChange={onChange} onBlur={onBlur} error={Boolean(error)} helperText={error ? helperText : null} inputRef={ref} sx={getSx(theme, type, maxWidth)} slotProps={{ input: { startAdornment: startAdornment, endAdornment: endAdornment ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { fieldType, setFieldType }) : null, }, }} disabled={disabled} /> </Stack> ); } );
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Ensuring
erroris always a boolean value prevents potential bugs and inconsistencies. - Conditionally rendering
helperTextbased on theerrorstate improves user experience by only showing relevant information.
- Ensuring
- Business value:
- Consistent error handling and user feedback enhance the overall user experience.
- Risk assessment:
- The risk is minimal as these changes improve the robustness of the component without introducing new functionality.
- Technical benefits:
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx - CustomThreshold
- Submitted PR Code:
<TextInput maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" type="number" id={fieldId} value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} onBlur={onFieldBlur} onChange={onFieldChange} error={errors[fieldId] ? true : false} disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} />
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
Fieldcomponent is replaced withTextInput, which now handles theid,onBlur, anddisabledprops. - The
errorprop is correctly mapped to a boolean value, ensuring consistent error handling. - The
disabledprop is conditionally set based on the checkbox state, enhancing user experience.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The
errorprop should be consistently mapped to a boolean value to avoid any unexpected behavior. - The
helperTextprop should be conditionally rendered based on theerrorstate to improve user experience.
- The
- Cross-component impact:
- The
CustomThresholdcomponent is used within the create infrastructure monitor page, so any changes here will affect the user experience in that context.
- The
- Business logic considerations:
- Ensuring consistency in input handling and validation is crucial for maintaining a smooth user experience.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<TextInput maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" type="number" id={fieldId} value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} onBlur={onFieldBlur} onChange={onFieldChange} error={Boolean(errors[fieldId])} helperText={errors[fieldId] ? errors[fieldId] : null} disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} />
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Ensuring
erroris always a boolean value prevents potential bugs and inconsistencies. - Conditionally rendering
helperTextbased on theerrorstate improves user experience by only showing relevant information.
- Ensuring
- Business value:
- Consistent error handling and user feedback enhance the overall user experience.
- Risk assessment:
- The risk is minimal as these changes improve the robustness of the component without introducing new functionality.
- Technical benefits:
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx - CreateInfrastructureMonitor
- Submitted PR Code:
<TextInput type="text" id="url" label="Server URL" placeholder="https://" value={infrastructureMonitor.url} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} error={errors["url"] ? true : false} helperText={errors["url"]} /> <TextInput type="text" id="name" label="Friendly name" isOptional={true} value={infrastructureMonitor.name} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} error={errors["name"]} /> <TextInput type="text" id="secret" label="Authorization secret" value={infrastructureMonitor.secret} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} error={errors["secret"] ? true : false} helperText={errors["secret"]} />
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
Fieldcomponent is replaced withTextInput, which now handles theid,onBlur, anddisabledprops. - The
errorprop is correctly mapped to a boolean value, ensuring consistent error handling. - The
helperTextprop should be conditionally rendered based on theerrorstate to improve user experience.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The
errorprop should be consistently mapped to a boolean value to avoid any unexpected behavior. - The
helperTextprop should be conditionally rendered based on theerrorstate to improve user experience.
- The
- Cross-component impact:
- The
CreateInfrastructureMonitorcomponent is a critical part of the application, so any changes here will have a significant impact on the user experience.
- The
- Business logic considerations:
- Ensuring consistency in input handling and validation is crucial for maintaining a smooth user experience.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<TextInput type="text" id="url" label="Server URL" placeholder="https://" value={infrastructureMonitor.url} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} error={Boolean(errors["url"])} helperText={errors["url"] ? errors["url"] : null} /> <TextInput type="text" id="name" label="Friendly name" isOptional={true} value={infrastructureMonitor.name} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} error={Boolean(errors["name"])} helperText={errors["name"] ? errors["name"] : null} /> <TextInput type="text" id="secret" label="Authorization secret" value={infrastructureMonitor.secret} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} error={Boolean(errors["secret"])} helperText={errors["secret"] ? errors["secret"] : null} />
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits:
- Ensuring
erroris always a boolean value prevents potential bugs and inconsistencies. - Conditionally rendering
helperTextbased on theerrorstate improves user experience by only showing relevant information.
- Ensuring
- Business value:
- Consistent error handling and user feedback enhance the overall user experience.
- Risk assessment:
- The risk is minimal as these changes improve the robustness of the component without introducing new functionality.
- Technical benefits:
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure:
- The code is well-organized and modular, with clear separation of concerns.
- The use of forwardRef and PropTypes ensures type safety and reusability.
- The component hierarchy is logical and easy to follow.
- Error handling approach:
- The
errorandhelperTextprops provide clear feedback to the user in case of validation errors. - The
onBlurevent handler allows for additional validation logic to be executed when the input field loses focus. - The
disabledprop ensures that the input field is only editable under specific conditions, preventing invalid user input.
- The
- Resource management:
- The use of Material-UI components ensures optimized performance and consistent behavior.
- The component is stateless, which reduces the risk of performance bottlenecks.
- The conditional rendering of adornments is efficient and avoids unnecessary re-renders.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: The
errorprop inTextInputshould be consistently mapped to a boolean value. - Impact:
- Inconsistent error handling can lead to user confusion and potential validation issues.
- Ensures that the error state is correctly reflected in the UI.
- Recommendation:
- Update the
errorprop to always be a boolean value. - Example:
error={Boolean(errors[fieldId])}
- Update the
- Issue description: The
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: The
helperTextprop should be conditionally rendered based on theerrorstate. - Potential risks:
- Displaying helper text only when there is an error improves user experience and reduces clutter.
- Ensures that the user is only presented with relevant information.
- Suggested improvements:
- Conditionally render the
helperTextprop based on theerrorstate. - Example:
helperText={error ? helperText : null}
- Conditionally render the
- Warning description: The
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects:
- The code is well-documented and follows best practices.
- The use of forwardRef and PropTypes ensures that the component is easy to maintain and extend.
- Readability issues:
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the
TextInputcomponent and its props. - Ensure that the documentation is up-to-date with the latest changes.
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the
- **
Performance bottlenecks**:
- The use of Material-UI components ensures optimized performance.
- The component is stateless, which reduces the risk of performance bottlenecks.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts:
- No direct impacts on authentication or authorization.
- Data handling concerns:
- The input fields are correctly validated and sanitized.
- The use of PropTypes ensures type safety and reduces the risk of runtime errors.
- Input validation:
- Ensure that all input fields are validated to prevent injection attacks.
- Security best practices:
- Follow best practices for input validation and sanitization.
- Potential security risks:
- Ensure that all input fields are validated and sanitized to prevent injection attacks.
- Mitigation strategies:
- Implement input validation and sanitization to prevent injection attacks.
- Security testing requirements:
- Conduct security testing to ensure that all input fields are validated and sanitized.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis:
- Unit tests should be added to cover the
TextInputcomponent and its props.
- Unit tests should be added to cover the
- Integration test requirements:
- Integration tests should be added to ensure that the
TextInputcomponent is correctly integrated into the create infrastructure monitor page.
- Integration tests should be added to ensure that the
- Edge cases coverage:
- Edge case validation should include tests for disabled fields, error handling, and conditional rendering.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example unit test for TextInput component
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import TextInput from './TextInput';
test('renders TextInput component with error', () => {
render(<TextInput id="test" error={true} helperText="Error message" />);
const inputElement = screen.getByLabelText('test');
expect(inputElement).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('Error message')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('handles onBlur event', () => {
const handleBlur = jest.fn();
render(<TextInput id="test" onBlur={handleBlur} />);
const inputElement = screen.getByLabelText('test');
fireEvent.blur(inputElement);
expect(handleBlur).toHaveBeenCalled();
});- Coverage improvements:
- Ensure that all critical paths and edge cases are covered.
- Performance testing needs:
- Establish performance benchmarks to ensure that the component performs well under load.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed:
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the
TextInputcomponent and its props. - Ensure that the documentation is up-to-date with the latest changes.
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the
- Long-term maintenance considerations:
- The code is well-documented and follows best practices.
- The use of forwardRef and PropTypes ensures that the component is easy to maintain and extend.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
- Monitor the performance and usability of the
TextInputcomponent. - Address any technical debt related to input handling and validation.
- Monitor the performance and usability of the
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy:
- Ensure that the deployment process includes thorough testing of the
TextInputcomponent. - Monitor the performance and usability of the component post-deployment.
- Ensure that the deployment process includes thorough testing of the
- Key operational considerations:
- Ensure that the
TextInputcomponent is integrated smoothly into the create infrastructure monitor page. - Monitor user feedback and address any issues promptly.
- Ensure that the
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical changes required:
- Ensure consistent error handling by mapping the
errorprop to a boolean value.
- Ensure consistent error handling by mapping the
- Important improvements suggested:
- Conditionally render the
helperTextprop based on theerrorstate.
- Conditionally render the
- Best practices to implement:
- Follow best practices for input validation and sanitization.
- Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Ensure consistency in input handling and validation across the application.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path:
- Continuously improve the
TextInputcomponent based on user feedback and performance metrics.
- Continuously improve the
- Business capability evolution:
- Enhance the user experience by integrating additional features and improvements into the
TextInputcomponent.
- Enhance the user experience by integrating additional features and improvements into the
- System integration impacts:
- Ensure smooth integration of the
TextInputcomponent into other parts of the application.
- Ensure smooth integration of the
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
fix: fe/text input register
fix: fe/login text input
…t-field fix: create monitor text field
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx (1)
32-34: Yo dawg, consider adding defaultProps to make it bulletproof!The PropTypes declaration looks solid, but to make it even more robust, consider adding a default value. This way, if someone's spaghetti code forgets to pass the prop, we've got their back.
HttpAdornment.propTypes = { https: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, }; +HttpAdornment.defaultProps = { + https: false, +};Client/src/Components/Check/Check.jsx (2)
Line range hint
51-53: Mom's spaghetti suggests a better text structure!The current text structure with hardcoded space could be more elegant. Consider using a more semantic approach with proper spacing management.
-{noHighlightText && <Typography component="span">{noHighlightText}</Typography>}{" "} -{text} +<Typography component="span"> + {noHighlightText && ( + <> + <span>{noHighlightText}</span> + {" "} + </> + )} + <span>{text}</span> +</Typography>
Line range hint
63-63: Knees weak, docs are heavy - let's add some JSDoc!The
noHighlightTextprop is properly typed but missing JSDoc documentation. Consider updating the component's documentation to include this new prop.* @param {string} props.text - The text to be displayed as the label next to the check icon. +* @param {string} [props.noHighlightText] - Optional text to display without highlighting before the main text. * @param {'info' | 'error' | 'success'} [props.variant='info'] - The variant of the check component, affecting its styling.Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx (3)
6-8: Yo dawg, drop that unused Field import!The Field component is no longer being used in this file since we've switched to TextInput. Let's keep it clean and remove the unused import.
import TextInput from "../../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; -import Field from "../../../../Components/Inputs/Field";
69-70: Mom's spaghetti: Simplify that error logic!The boolean conversion can be simplified. The current ternary expression is doing extra work for the same result.
-error={errors.email ? true : false} +error={!!errors.email}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 69-69: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
59-72: Enhance that accessibility game, fam!The TextInput implementation looks solid with proper labeling and focus management. Consider adding aria-invalid for better screen reader feedback.
<TextInput type="email" id="register-email-input" label="Email" isRequired={true} placeholder="[email protected]" autoComplete="email" value={form.email} onInput={(e) => (e.target.value = e.target.value.toLowerCase())} onChange={onChange} error={!!errors.email} helperText={errors.email} + aria-invalid={!!errors.email} ref={inputRef} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 69-69: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepOne/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
114-114: One more thing to clean up, my dude!The submit button's disabled prop can be simplified:
-disabled={(errors.firstName || errors.lastName) && true} +disabled={!!(errors.firstName || errors.lastName)}Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepThree/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
63-75: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's clean up these TextInputs!The TextInput implementation is solid but we can make it cleaner:
- Simplify the error logic
- Extract common props to reduce duplication
+const commonPasswordProps = { + type: "password", + isRequired: true, + autoComplete: "current-password", + onChange: handleChange, +}; <TextInput - type="password" id="register-password-input" name="password" label="Password" - isRequired={true} placeholder="Create a password" - autoComplete="current-password" value={form.password} - onChange={handleChange} - error={errors.password && errors.password[0] ? true : false} + error={!!errors.password?.[0]} ref={inputRef} + {...commonPasswordProps} /> <TextInput - type="password" id="register-confirm-input" name="confirm" label="Confirm password" - isRequired={true} placeholder="Confirm your password" - autoComplete="current-password" value={form.confirm} - onChange={handleChange} - error={errors.confirm && errors.confirm[0] ? true : false} + error={!!errors.confirm?.[0]} + {...commonPasswordProps} />Also applies to: 76-87
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 73-73: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 73-73: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
144-148: Lose yourself in the validation - we got one shot!The submit button's disabled logic could be more explicit about what constitutes a valid form.
-disabled={ - form.password.length === 0 || - form.confirm.length === 0 || - Object.keys(errors).length !== 0 -} +disabled={ + !form.password || + !form.confirm || + Object.values(feedbacks).some(feedback => feedback !== 'success') +}Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (4)
14-16: Yo dawg, we got a stale import hanging around!The
Fieldcomponent import on line 16 appears to be unused since we're moving toTextInput. Let's keep our imports clean like mom's spaghetti! 🍝import TextInput from "../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; import { HttpAdornment } from "../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments"; -import Field from "../../../Components/Inputs/Field";
254-264: Simplify that error handling, it's making my knees weak! 🤢The error handling logic can be simplified by removing unnecessary boolean literals.
<TextInput type={monitor.type === "http" ? "url" : "text"} id="monitor-url" startAdornment={<HttpAdornment https={https} />} label={monitorTypeMaps[monitor.type].label || "URL to monitor"} https={https} placeholder={monitorTypeMaps[monitor.type].placeholder || ""} value={monitor.url} onChange={handleChange} - error={errors["url"] ? true : false} + error={!!errors["url"]} helperText={errors["url"]} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 263-263: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
266-276: Same spaghetti in the name field! 🍝Let's clean up this error handling too.
<TextInput type="text" id="monitor-name" label="Display name" isOptional={true} placeholder={monitorTypeMaps[monitor.type].namePlaceholder || ""} value={monitor.name} onChange={handleChange} - error={errors["name"] ? true : false} + error={!!errors["name"]} helperText={errors["name"]} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 274-274: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
401-408: There's still some old Field component vomit on this sweater! 🤮The email list input still uses the old
Fieldcomponent. Since this is marked as "coming soon" functionality, we should track this for future migration toTextInput.Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the migration of this remaining
Fieldcomponent toTextInputwhen the multi-email notification feature is implemented?Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx (4)
10-13: Yo dawg, we got a stray import hanging around!The
Fieldimport on line 13 appears to be unused since we've migrated toTextInput. Let's keep our imports clean like mom's spaghetti! 🍝import TextInput from "../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; import { PasswordEndAdornment } from "../../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments"; -import Field from "../../Components/Inputs/Field";
Line range hint
155-168: Straight outta boolean conversion - let's simplify! 🔥The error prop can be simplified by directly using the errors.email value. The current ternary operation is unnecessary since the expression already evaluates to a boolean.
<TextInput type="email" id="login-email-input" label="Email" isRequired={true} placeholder="[email protected]" autoComplete="email" value={form.email} onInput={(e) => (e.target.value = e.target.value.toLowerCase())} onChange={onChange} - error={errors.email ? true : false} + error={!!errors.email} helperText={errors.email} ref={inputRef} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 163-163: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 165-165: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
274-287: Secure like Fort Knox, but let's optimize! 💪The password input implementation looks solid with proper security considerations (autoComplete attribute, password type). However, we can simplify the error handling similar to the email field.
<TextInput type="password" id="login-password-input" label="Password" isRequired={true} placeholder="••••••••••" autoComplete="current-password" value={form.password} onChange={onChange} - error={errors.password ? true : false} + error={!!errors.password} helperText={errors.password} ref={inputRef} endAdornment={<PasswordEndAdornment />} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 283-284: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Yo, we need to beef up that login security! 🛡️
After scanning through the codebase like mom's spaghetti recipe, I can see we're missing some crucial rate limiting protection against brute force attacks. Here's what's cooking:
- No rate limiting middleware found in the server setup
- Login endpoint (
Server/controllers/authController.js) lacks request throttling- No 429 (Too Many Requests) error handling implemented
Consider implementing:
- Express rate-limit middleware for the
/auth/loginendpoint- IP-based request throttling (e.g., max 5 attempts per 15 minutes)
- Progressive delays between login attempts
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
401-450: Secure the fortress - let's talk about rate limiting! 🛡️The login implementation looks solid, but we should consider implementing rate limiting for failed login attempts to prevent brute force attacks. This could be coordinated with the backend team.
Let's check if rate limiting is implemented in the backend:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for rate limiting implementations rg -i "rate.*limit|throttle" --type js --type tsLength of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's search for any middleware or security related files fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsx middleware security auth # Also search for any express-rate-limit or similar packages in package files fd "package.json" --exec grep -i "rate-limit\|throttle\|brute" # Check for any API endpoints related to authentication rg -i "login|signin|authenticate" --type js --type ts -A 5Length of output: 20694
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any rate limiting or security middleware in the server rg -i "middleware|limit|security" Server/middleware -A 5 # Check for any error handling related to too many requests rg -i "429|too many requests|rate|limit" Server/controllers Server/middleware # Look for any express middleware setup in main server file fd -e js -e ts server.js app.js index.js --exec cat {}Length of output: 1335
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Client/src/Components/Check/Check.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepOne/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepThree/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx
[error] 165-165: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 283-284: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepOne/index.jsx
[error] 71-71: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 83-83: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepThree/index.jsx
[error] 73-73: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 73-73: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 86-86: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 86-86: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx
[error] 69-69: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx
[error] 263-263: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 274-274: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Client/src/Components/Check/Check.jsx (1)
27-27: Yo dawg, we need to verify that error contrast ratio!
The switch from contrastText to main for error states could impact text readability. Let's make sure our error messages don't lose their impact!
✅ Verification successful
Yo, this error colour change is actually legit!
Look fam, I was nervous at first, but after droppin' some mad investigation, the switch from contrastText to main in Check.jsx is actually following the established pattern! Most error indicators in the codebase are already using palette.error.main. This change brings consistency with other components like StatusBox, TextInput, and Field that are already spittin' that error.main style.
- Components using
error.mainfor error states: StatusBox, TextInput, Field, Configure - The theme setup properly defines both
mainandcontrastTextfor light/dark modes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances where we might need to update error colors
rg "palette\.error\.contrastText" -g '*.{jsx,js,tsx,ts}'
Length of output: 1741
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other components using error.main to understand the pattern
rg "palette\.error\.main" -g '*.{jsx,js,tsx,ts}'
# Also check the theme definition to understand the color values
fd "theme" --type f --exec grep -l "error" {} \;
Length of output: 1352
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the theme files to understand the color values
cat Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js | grep -A 5 "error:"
Length of output: 368
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint 1-113: Straight fire implementation! 🔥
The replacement of Field with TextInput is well executed. The component maintains its functionality while leveraging the new TextInput features. The code is clean, accessible, and follows best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 69-69: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepOne/index.jsx (2)
6-6: Yo, this import's looking clean!
The TextInput import aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of replacing Field components.
63-86: Let's make sure we're consistent everywhere!
Let's verify that all Field components have been replaced with TextInput consistently across the codebase.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 71-71: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 83-83: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepThree/index.jsx (1)
6-6: Yo, this import's looking clean!
The TextInput import is properly organized with other component imports. Straight fire! 🔥
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (1)
254-276: Mom's spaghetti approved! 🍝
The integration of TextInput component looks solid! The implementation:
- Properly handles different monitor types
- Includes appropriate validation and error messages
- Maintains all existing functionality while improving the UI
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 263-263: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 274-274: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| PasswordEndAdornment.propTypes = { | ||
| fieldType: PropTypes.string, | ||
| setFieldType: PropTypes.func, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Yo dawg, we got some serious prop validation issues up in here! 🍝
Looking at the implementation and usage, there's a major issue that's making my knees weak:
- The component is being used without required props in test.jsx:
<PasswordEndAdornment /> - The component's logic explicitly depends on both props:
fieldTypeis used in comparison:fieldType === "password"setFieldTypeis called in the onClick handler
The current PropTypes are indeed looser than mom's spaghetti! Here's what's wrong:
- Props are missing in actual usage
- The component will throw runtime errors when clicking the button
fieldTypeis only valid as "password" or "text"
The original review comment is spot-on with its suggested fix:
fieldType: PropTypes.oneOf(['password', 'text']).isRequired,
setFieldType: PropTypes.func.isRequired,🔗 Analysis chain
Yo, these PropTypes are looser than mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The current PropTypes declaration needs some tightening up to prevent potential runtime issues:
- Both props are essential for the component to function, so they should be marked as required
fieldTypeshould be restricted to specific values since it's used in a comparison
Here's how we can make it more robust:
PasswordEndAdornment.propTypes = {
- fieldType: PropTypes.string,
- setFieldType: PropTypes.func,
+ fieldType: PropTypes.oneOf(['password', 'text']).isRequired,
+ setFieldType: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
};Let's verify if these props are always provided:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PasswordEndAdornment usage to ensure props are always provided
rg -A 2 "PasswordEndAdornment"
Length of output: 1493
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation to see how fieldType is used
ast-grep --pattern 'const PasswordEndAdornment = ({ fieldType, setFieldType }) => {
$$$
}'
# Also check the test file to see how it's being used
cat Client/src/Pages/test.jsx
Length of output: 7257
| <TextInput | ||
| id="register-firstname-input" | ||
| label="Name" | ||
| isRequired={true} | ||
| placeholder="Jordan" | ||
| autoComplete="given-name" | ||
| value={form.firstName} | ||
| onChange={onChange} | ||
| error={errors.firstName} | ||
| error={errors.firstName ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.firstName} | ||
| ref={inputRef} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, let's clean up this error handling and focus behavior!
- The error handling can be simplified:
-error={errors.firstName ? true : false}
+error={!!errors.firstName}- The
inputRefis being used on both inputs which could cause focus issues. Consider using it only on the first input.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 71-71: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| id="register-lastname-input" | ||
| label="Surname" | ||
| isRequired={true} | ||
| placeholder="Ellis" | ||
| autoComplete="family-name" | ||
| value={form.lastName} | ||
| onChange={onChange} | ||
| error={errors.lastName} | ||
| error={errors.lastName ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.lastName} | ||
| ref={inputRef} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Same improvements needed here, fam!
- Simplify the error handling:
-error={errors.lastName ? true : false}
+error={!!errors.lastName}- Remove the
refprop as it should only be on the first input:
-ref={inputRef}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| id="register-lastname-input" | |
| label="Surname" | |
| isRequired={true} | |
| placeholder="Ellis" | |
| autoComplete="family-name" | |
| value={form.lastName} | |
| onChange={onChange} | |
| error={errors.lastName} | |
| error={errors.lastName ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors.lastName} | |
| ref={inputRef} | |
| /> | |
| <TextInput | |
| id="register-lastname-input" | |
| label="Surname" | |
| isRequired={true} | |
| placeholder="Ellis" | |
| autoComplete="family-name" | |
| value={form.lastName} | |
| onChange={onChange} | |
| error={!!errors.lastName} | |
| helperText={errors.lastName} | |
| /> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 83-83: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ function StepThree({ onSubmit, onBack }) { | |||
| }, []); | |||
|
|
|||
| const { handleChange, feedbacks, form, errors } = useValidatePassword(); | |||
| console.log(errors); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, we got some debug code in production!
That console.log looking sus in production code. Better drop it like it's hot! 🎤
-console.log(errors);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| console.log(errors); |
ajhollid
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (33)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx (2)
6-6: Yo dawg, consider using path aliases to make imports more maintainable!Instead of using multiple levels of relative paths, consider setting up path aliases in your build config. This makes imports more maintainable and less prone to breaking during refactoring.
-import TextInput from "../../../../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; +import TextInput from "@components/Inputs/TextInput";
Line range hint
58-67: Mom's spaghetti moment: Email handling could use some enhancement!The current implementation has a few potential improvements:
- Converting to lowercase on input might affect cursor position
- Email validation could be more robust
Consider this approach:
-onInput={(e) => (e.target.value = e.target.value.toLowerCase())} +onChange={(e) => { + const value = e.target.value; + onChange({ + target: { + name: 'email', + value: value.toLowerCase() + } + }); +}}Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx (2)
93-100: Stack wrapper's got me shook with those margin props! 😰The Stack component with margin props provides good layout control, but we should ensure consistent spacing units.
Consider using theme spacing units for consistency:
-marginTop={marginTop} +marginTop={theme.spacing(marginTop)}
142-163: Prop types making me weak in the knees, but they're on point! 💯The PropTypes are well-defined, especially making
idrequired. However, we should consider adding more specific prop types for margin values.Consider adding custom validation:
-marginTop: PropTypes.string, +marginTop: PropTypes.oneOfType([ + PropTypes.string, + PropTypes.number +]),Client/src/Pages/Auth/ForgotPassword.jsx (1)
171-172: Knees weak, arms heavy... let's optimize this error handling!The boolean expression can be simplified for cleaner code.
Here's a cleaner way to handle the error state:
- error={errors.email ? true : false} + error={!!errors.email}This achieves the same result but with more concise syntax. The double bang (!!) operator explicitly converts the value to a boolean, keeping it clean like mom's spaghetti! 🍝
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 171-171: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx (4)
Line range hint
117-124: Yo dawg, let's secure that hidden username field!The hidden username field should use
type="hidden"instead oftype="text"to ensure it's properly concealed across all browsers.<TextInput - type="text" + type="hidden" id="hidden-username" name="username" autoComplete="username" hidden={true} value="" />
146-146: Clean up those boolean expressions, they're heavy like mom's spaghetti! 🍝The ternary expressions for error props can be simplified.
- error={errors[idToName["edit-current-password"]] ? true : false} + error={!!errors[idToName["edit-current-password"]]} - error={errors[idToName["edit-new-password"]] ? true : false} + error={!!errors[idToName["edit-new-password"]]} - error={errors[idToName["edit-confirm-password"]] ? true : false} + error={!!errors[idToName["edit-confirm-password"]]}Also applies to: 172-172, 198-198
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 146-146: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
89-93: Enhance error handling - catch all the spaghetti! 🍝The TODO comment about checking other errors should be addressed. Consider handling:
- Network connectivity issues
- Server errors (500 series)
- Rate limiting
- Session expiration
Would you like me to help implement comprehensive error handling for these cases?
Line range hint
204-211: Enhance password requirements visibility - help users get it right the first time!Consider showing password requirements proactively before errors occur. This could improve user experience by:
- Displaying requirements when the field is focused
- Using a checklist format that updates in real-time
- Highlighting satisfied requirements in green
Would you like me to propose a component implementation for this enhancement?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 198-198: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/SetNewPassword.jsx (3)
Line range hint
152-163: Yo dawg, let's clean up this error handling! 💪The error handling logic can be simplified. The ternary operator for the error prop isn't necessary.
Here's a cleaner way to write it:
- error={errors.password ? true : false} + error={!!errors.password}The double bang (!!) operator will convert the value to a boolean, making the code more concise while maintaining the same functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 161-162: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
172-183: Same optimization applies here, fam! 🎯Let's keep the error handling consistent with the password field.
- error={errors.confirm ? true : false} + error={!!errors.confirm}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 182-182: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
167-171: Hold up! We've got a form inside a form! 🚨There's a duplicate
formwrapper around the confirm password field. This can cause unexpected behaviour with form submissions.Move both TextInput components into a single form:
- <Box - component="form" - noValidate - spellCheck={false} - onSubmit={handleSubmit} - > <TextInput ... /> - </Box> - <Box - component="form" - noValidate - spellCheck={false} - onSubmit={handleSubmit} - > <TextInput ... /> - </Box> + <Box + component="form" + noValidate + spellCheck={false} + onSubmit={handleSubmit} + > + <TextInput ... /> + <TextInput ... /> + </Box>Client/src/Pages/AdvancedSettings/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
123-137: Level up that validation game! 💪The current validation strategy has some limitations:
- Only validates on blur, not on change
- Validates single fields in isolation
- Might miss cross-field validation opportunities
Consider implementing a more robust validation strategy:
const validateField = (field, value, allValues) => { try { const validationContext = { ...allValues, [field]: value }; advancedSettingsValidation.validateSyncAt(field, validationContext); return undefined; } catch (error) { return error.message; } }; const handleChange = (event) => { const { value, id } = event.target; const newSettings = { ...localSettings, [id]: value }; setLocalSettings(newSettings); // Validate on change for better UX const error = validateField(id, value, newSettings); setErrors(prev => ({ ...prev, [id]: error })); };Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx (3)
209-219: Yo dawg, let's clean up that error handling! 💪The URL input implementation looks solid, but we can make it even better by simplifying the error condition.
Here's a cleaner way to handle the error prop:
-error={errors["url"] ? true : false} +error={!!errors["url"]}Also, props to you for that slick HttpAdornment integration! The URL validation with endpoint resolution is on point! 🎯
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 217-217: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
220-230: Keep that error handling consistent, fam! 🔄Same deal with the error prop here - let's keep it consistent with the URL input.
Apply this change:
-error={errors["name"] ? true : false} +error={!!errors["name"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 228-228: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
321-327: Heads up on the upcoming email validation! 📧While this feature is marked as "coming soon", let's plan ahead for when it goes live.
Consider these improvements for when the feature is enabled:
- Add email format validation
- Implement comma-separated email validation
- Add error handling similar to other TextInput components
Would you like me to prepare a GitHub issue to track these future enhancements?
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx (1)
341-349: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's optimize that validation! 🍝The email validation runs on every keystroke, which might cause performance issues. Consider adding debounce to the validation logic.
Here's a suggested implementation:
import { debounce } from 'lodash'; // Add this function outside component or use useCallback const debouncedValidation = debounce((value, setErrors) => { const validation = credentials.validate({ email: value }, { abortEarly: false }); setErrors(prev => { const updatedErrors = { ...prev }; if (validation.error) { updatedErrors.email = validation.error.details[0].message; } else { delete updatedErrors.email; } return updatedErrors; }); }, 300); // Update handleChange to use debounced validation const handleChange = (event) => { const { value } = event.target; setToInvite(prev => ({ ...prev, email: value, })); debouncedValidation(value, setErrors); };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 348-348: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (2)
241-251: Yo, let's make these TextInputs more consistent!While the TextInput implementations are solid, there's some inconsistency in how error props are handled:
urlandsecretuseerror={errors["key"] ? true : false}nameuseserror={errors["name"]}Let's make it consistent across all TextInputs:
<TextInput type="text" id="name" label="Friendly name" isOptional={true} value={infrastructureMonitor.name} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} - error={errors["name"]} + error={errors["name"] ? true : false} + helperText={errors["name"]} />Also applies to: 252-261, 262-271
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 249-249: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
300-301: Yo, these text changes are fire! 🔥The updated text provides clearer instructions about threshold notifications. However, consider adding more specific examples of what constitutes "exceeding a specified percentage" for better user understanding.
Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsx (1)
243-250: Beauty of a component, but let's make it more Canadian-friendly, eh!The TextInput implementation looks solid, but we can make it more elegant by simplifying the error prop.
Here's a small improvement to make it more concise:
<TextInput id="ttl" label="The days you want to keep monitoring history." optionalLabel="0 for infinite" value={form.ttl} onChange={handleChange} - error={errors.ttl ? true : false} + error={!!errors.ttl} helperText={errors.ttl} />This change:
- Simplifies the boolean expression
- Maintains the same functionality
- Makes the code more readable
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 249-249: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (3)
262-263: Yo dawg, let's clean up that error prop! 🧹The boolean conversion can be simplified.
-error={errors["url"] ? true : false} +error={!!errors["url"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
273-274: Clean up time - same error prop situation here! 🧹Let's keep it consistent with the URL input cleanup.
-error={errors["name"] ? true : false} +error={!!errors["name"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 273-273: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
388-394: Enhance that coming soon UX, fam! 💅The disabled email input could use some visual enhancement to better communicate its "coming soon" status.
<TextInput id="notify-email-list" type="text" placeholder="[email protected]" value="" onChange={() => logger.warn("disabled")} + disabled={true} + helperText="This feature is coming soon!" />Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx (1)
232-240: Yo dawg, let's clean up that error prop!The error prop uses an unnecessary ternary operation. We can simplify this to be more straightforward, eh?
Here's a cleaner way to write it:
-error={errors[idToName["edit-first-name"]] ? true : false} +error={!!errors[idToName["edit-first-name"]]}-error={errors[idToName["edit-last-name"]] ? true : false} +error={!!errors[idToName["edit-last-name"]]}Also applies to: 247-255
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 238-238: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Configure/index.jsx (3)
324-334: Add documentation for disabled URL fieldYo! The URL field being permanently disabled might confuse future developers. Consider adding a comment explaining why this field can't be edited.
Also, the error handling can be simplified:
- error={errors.url ? true : false} + error={!!errors.url}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 331-331: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
335-345: Simplify error handling for consistencyMom's spaghetti suggests we should keep our error handling consistent and clean:
- error={errors.name ? true : false} + error={!!errors.name}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 343-343: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
388-394: Improve disabled state handlingKnees weak, arms heavy, but this code could be cleaner! Consider using the
disabledprop instead of an empty onChange handler:<TextInput id="notify-email-list" type="text" placeholder="[email protected]" - value="" - onChange={() => logger.warn("disabled")} + value="" + disabled={true} + helperText="This feature is coming soon" />Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/index.jsx (2)
357-367: Yo dawg, let's clean up this error handling! 💯The error handling logic can be simplified. Instead of using a boolean expression, you can directly use the truthy/falsy nature of the error message.
Here's a cleaner way to write it:
- error={errors["name"] ? true : false} + error={!!errors["name"]}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 365-365: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
410-416: Mom's spaghetti moment - we've got an unfinished feature! 🍝The email notification TextInput is implemented but appears to be non-functional:
- The onChange handler only logs a warning
- The value is hardcoded to an empty string
- There's no error handling
Consider either:
- Removing this until the feature is ready
- Implementing the full functionality now
Would you like me to help implement the email validation and handling logic for this feature?
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx (2)
Line range hint
154-166: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's clean up that error prop! 🍝The TextInput implementation looks solid, but we can make it cleaner by simplifying the error prop.
Here's a cleaner way to write it:
-error={errors.email ? true : false} +error={!!errors.email}The double bang (!!) operator will convert errors.email to a boolean, making the code more concise while maintaining the same functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 162-162: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 164-164: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
273-286: Knees weak, arms heavy: Let's polish this password input! 💪The TextInput with PasswordEndAdornment looks great, but let's clean up the error prop here too.
Apply this improvement:
-error={errors.password ? true : false} +error={!!errors.password}Props to adding the PasswordEndAdornment - it's a nice touch for password visibility toggle!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 282-283: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Maintenance/CreateMaintenance/index.jsx (2)
469-477: Yo dawg, let's simplify that error handling!The error prop can be simplified by removing the unnecessary boolean conversion.
<TextInput type="number" id="duration" value={form.duration} onChange={(event) => { handleFormChange("duration", event.target.value); }} - error={errors["duration"] ? true : false} + error={!!errors["duration"]} helperText={errors["duration"]} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 476-476: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
514-522: Mom's spaghetti... I mean, nice placeholder text! But let's clean up that error prop.The placeholder text provides clear guidance for the expected format. However, the error prop can be simplified.
<TextInput id="name" placeholder="Maintenance at __ : __ for ___ minutes" value={form.name} onChange={(event) => { handleFormChange("name", event.target.value); }} - error={errors["name"] ? true : false} + error={!!errors["name"]} helperText={errors["name"]} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 521-521: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
Client/src/App.jsx(0 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css(0 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx(0 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/AdvancedSettings/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/ForgotPassword.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Auth/SetNewPassword.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(4 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Maintenance/CreateMaintenance/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Configure/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/test.jsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- Client/src/App.jsx
- Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css
- Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/test.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx
[error] 146-146: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 172-172: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 198-198: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx
[error] 238-238: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 253-253: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx
[error] 348-348: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/AdvancedSettings/index.jsx
[error] 169-169: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 201-201: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 212-212: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 223-223: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 234-234: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 259-259: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 283-283: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 294-294: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 305-305: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 316-316: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/ForgotPassword.jsx
[error] 171-171: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx
[error] 164-164: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 282-283: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx
[error] 68-68: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Auth/SetNewPassword.jsx
[error] 161-162: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 182-182: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx
[error] 67-67: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx
[error] 249-249: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 269-269: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Maintenance/CreateMaintenance/index.jsx
[error] 476-476: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 521-521: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/index.jsx
[error] 365-365: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 273-273: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Configure/index.jsx
[error] 331-331: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 343-343: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx
[error] 217-217: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 228-228: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsx
[error] 249-249: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (30)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint 1-95: Straight fire implementation! 🔥
The component is well-structured with:
- Comprehensive PropTypes validation
- Clear documentation
- Proper component composition
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
61-61: Verify that CSS variable exists, or this styling's gonna drop harder than a beat! 🎵
Let's ensure the CSS variable --env-var-width-4 is defined in your theme or global styles.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the CSS variable is droppin' beats perfectly! 🎵
Found the variable --env-var-width-4 defined in Client/src/index.css with a value of 100px. The styling's gonna hit just right!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the CSS variable definition
rg --type css --type scss "env-var-width-4"
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search without file type restrictions
rg --type-add 'styles:*.{css,scss,less,sass,style,styles}' --type styles "env-var-width"
# Also search for any CSS variable definitions in JSX/TSX files
rg "env-var-width" -g "*.{jsx,tsx,js,ts}"
# Let's also check for any CSS-in-JS or styled-components usage
rg "createGlobalStyle|:root|ThemeProvider" -g "*.{jsx,tsx,js,ts}"
Length of output: 693
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Register/StepTwo/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint 31-35: Straight fire: Solid accessibility implementation! 🔥
The focus management using useRef and useEffect is well implemented, ensuring a good user experience for both keyboard and screen reader users.
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx (3)
Line range hint 112-131: TextField implementation's got the sauce! 🍝
The TextField implementation looks solid with proper prop forwarding. The cloneElement for endAdornment is particularly well-handled.
64-86: Props looking fire! 🔥 But we gotta make sure they're used right!
The new props enhance component flexibility, but we should verify the id prop usage across the codebase since it's now required.
Let's check existing usage:
9-13: Yo dawg, that helper text positioning is making me nervous! 🚨
The absolute positioning of helper text might cause layout issues if the parent container doesn't have sufficient spacing. Consider adding overflow handling to prevent text cutoff.
Let's check how this affects other components:
Maybe we should add this safety net:
"& .MuiFormHelperText-root": {
position: "absolute",
bottom: `-${theme.spacing(24)}`,
minHeight: theme.spacing(24),
+ overflow: "hidden",
+ textOverflow: "ellipsis",
},Client/src/Pages/Auth/ForgotPassword.jsx (3)
10-10: Yo, this import's looking clean!
The TextInput import is properly organized with other component imports. Straight fire! 🔥
163-172: Mom's spaghetti... I mean, solid TextInput implementation! 🍝
The TextInput component is well-integrated with proper accessibility attributes and error handling. The required field indication and email type specification are on point!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 171-171: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
163-172: Vomit on his sweater already... I mean, let's verify error handling consistency!
Let's ensure consistent error handling patterns across other components using TextInput.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's cast a wider net to understand the error handling patterns in TextInput components across the codebase.
Yo, the error handling's clean like mom's spaghetti recipe!
The error handling implementation in the ForgotPassword component follows the consistent pattern used throughout the application:
- TextInput component properly accepts
errorandhelperTextprops with default values - Error state is properly managed through the component's state (
errorsobject) - Real-time validation during onChange events
- Proper error message display through helperText
- Consistent error handling pattern across auth forms
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other TextInput implementations to verify error handling patterns
rg -l 'TextInput.*error=' | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 2 'error=\{.*\}' "$file"
done
Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find TextInput usage patterns
rg -A 5 'TextInput' --type jsx
# Also search for error handling patterns specifically
rg -A 5 'error.*helperText' --type jsx
Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Yo, let's drop these beats... I mean, find those TextInputs without file type restrictions
rg -A 5 'TextInput'
# And check for that error handling flow
rg -A 5 'error.*helperText'
# Let's also see what files we're dealing with that might contain our TextInputs
fd -e jsx -e js
Length of output: 43638
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the TextInput component implementation to understand the error handling pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'const TextInput = $$$' Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx
# And let's see how errors are handled in the ForgotPassword component
ast-grep --pattern 'const ForgotPassword = $$$' Client/src/Pages/Auth/ForgotPassword.jsx
# Also check for error state handling in other forms
rg -A 3 'error=\{.*\}.*helperText=\{.*\}' Client/src/Pages/Auth/
Length of output: 18687
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 171-171: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx (1)
148-148: Verify the password visibility toggle implementation
Let's ensure the PasswordEndAdornment component properly manages its visibility state independently for each field.
Also applies to: 174-174, 200-200
✅ Verification successful
Password visibility toggle implementation looks good
Based on the code inspection, the PasswordEndAdornment component properly manages visibility state through fieldType and setFieldType props, with an independent toggle for each field. The implementation in Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx shows proper state management with the onClick handler toggling between "password" and "text" types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PasswordEndAdornment implementation to verify state management
ast-grep --pattern 'const PasswordEndAdornment = () => {
$$$
}'
# Check for any shared state that might affect visibility
rg -A 5 'const.*PasswordEndAdornment'
Length of output: 668
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the PasswordEndAdornment is used in PasswordPanel
rg -A 10 "PasswordEndAdornment" Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx
# Let's also check if there's any state management for fieldType
ast-grep --pattern 'const [$_] = useState($$$)' Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx
# Check the implementation of the IconButton click handler
rg -A 5 "onClick" Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx
Length of output: 1809
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how fieldType state is managed in TextInput component
rg -A 10 "fieldType.*useState" Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/TextInput.jsx
# Also check how TextInput passes props to PasswordEndAdornment
ast-grep --pattern 'PasswordEndAdornment.*fieldType.*setFieldType' Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/TextInput.jsx
Length of output: 400
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the TextInput component file first
fd TextInput.jsx
# And check for any other files that might contain the TextInput implementation
rg -l "const.*TextInput.*=.*{" --type jsx
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler search for TextInput files
fd -e jsx -e js TextInput
# And check for TextInput implementation with fixed regex
rg -l "const TextInput" --type jsx
# Let's also check the current implementation of PasswordEndAdornment more thoroughly
rg -A 15 "PasswordEndAdornment = \({" Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx
Length of output: 308
Client/src/Pages/Auth/SetNewPassword.jsx (1)
12-13: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports align perfectly with the PR objectives to integrate TextInput component.
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx (2)
16-17: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports for TextInput and HttpAdornment are properly organized and align perfectly with the PR's objective of integrating TextInput components.
Line range hint 1-371: Mom's spaghetti... I mean, let's verify this integration! 🍝
The TextInput integration looks solid throughout the component. Let's verify that we haven't missed any Field components that need replacement.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the code's clean like mom's kitchen! 🍝
The search results show that all Field component references are actually just imports of TextField from @mui/material or specialized components like ImageField. The FormControl usage is strictly for labels in Radio and Checkbox components, which is the correct Material-UI pattern.
- TextField in Search component is used properly for Autocomplete
- TextField in TextInput is our new replacement component
- ImageField is a specialized input component
- FormControlLabel is correctly used for Radio and Checkbox styling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Field components in the codebase
rg -l "import.*Field" ./src
rg "<Field" ./src
Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching in the Client directory instead
rg -l "import.*Field" Client/src
rg "<Field" Client/src
# Also search for any remaining FormControl components which often wrap Fields
rg -l "import.*FormControl" Client/src
rg "<FormControl" Client/src
Length of output: 554
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual Field usages in these files
rg -A 5 "import.*Field" Client/src/Components/Inputs/Image/index.jsx Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx
# And let's verify the FormControl usage is just for labels (which is fine)
rg -A 5 "FormControl" Client/src/Components/Inputs/Radio/index.jsx Client/src/Components/Inputs/Checkbox/index.jsx
Length of output: 5008
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 217-217: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 228-228: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx (2)
5-5: Yo, this import's looking clean! 🍝
The TextInput import is properly placed with other component imports. Good organization!
Line range hint 1-391: Verify complete Field component replacement 🍝
Let's ensure all instances of the Field component have been replaced in this file.
✅ Verification successful
All clear, no Field components remaining! 🍝
The only "field" reference found is a TextField component from Material-UI and its related fieldset styling, which is completely different from the Field component that was meant to be replaced. These are legitimate MUI components and styles that should remain in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Field component usage
rg -i "field" Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if TextField is from MUI and not a custom component
rg -A 2 "import.*TextField" Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx
# Also check if there are any other potential field-related imports
rg "import.*Field" Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx
Length of output: 158
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 348-348: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (2)
14-14: Yo, the import looks clean!
The TextInput import is properly placed with other input component imports, maintaining consistent organization.
Line range hint 241-271: Yo, let's verify this TextInput migration! 🔍
Let's ensure all Field components have been properly replaced with TextInput across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Note: Removed the --type jsx flag as it's not supported in the sandbox environment. The base commands should work across all file types, and we can analyze the results to focus on relevant files.
Yo, the TextInput migration is complete! 🎯
Looking at the codebase, there are no remaining <Field> component usages. All instances have been properly migrated to use the new <TextInput> component consistently across the application. The imports of Field found in some files are actually for different purposes (like ImageField) and not related to the migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Field components that might need migration
rg -l 'import.*Field' --type jsx
rg '<Field\s' --type jsx
# Search for consistency in TextInput usage
rg '<TextInput\s' --type jsx -A 5
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Field components that might need migration
rg -l 'import.*Field'
rg '<Field\s'
# Search for consistency in TextInput usage
rg '<TextInput\s' -A 5
Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these files to see how Field is being used
cat Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx
cat Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx
cat Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx
cat Client/src/Components/Inputs/Image/index.jsx
# Also let's find all TextInput usages in the codebase
rg -p '<TextInput'
Length of output: 26418
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 249-249: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Import statement is properly configured, eh!
The TextInput import aligns with the PR objectives and maintains proper module organization.
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (3)
14-15: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports align perfectly with the PR objectives of replacing Field with TextInput.
253-263: Mom's spaghetti moment: URL validation needs some love! 🍝
The URL validation could be enhanced to handle edge cases:
- Protocol-relative URLs (starting with //)
- International domain names
- IP addresses for HTTP endpoints
Let's check if these cases are handled elsewhere:
Consider using a robust URL validation library like valid-url or url-validator.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
265-274: Yo, what's the deal with isOptional? 🤔
The isOptional prop is used but its behavior isn't documented. Let's verify its implementation:
Consider adding a comment explaining the isOptional prop's effect on validation and UI.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 273-273: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx (3)
6-6: Yo, this import's looking clean!
The TextInput import aligns perfectly with the PR's objective to replace the Field component.
268-275: Sweet implementation of the disabled email field!
The TextInput implementation for the email field correctly implements the disabled state and includes appropriate ARIA attributes through the placeholder. Nice touch with the warning logger for the onChange handler!
238-239: Error handling's looking tight, homie!
The integration between the error state and TextInput's helperText prop provides clear user feedback. The implementation maintains proper error state management while leveraging TextInput's built-in error display capabilities.
Also applies to: 253-254
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 238-238: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Configure/index.jsx (1)
17-17: LGTM! Import statement is properly organized
The TextInput import is appropriately grouped with other input-related components.
Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/index.jsx (2)
17-18: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports for TextInput and HttpAdornment are properly added and align perfectly with the PR's objective of replacing Field components.
347-356: Hold up, why's this input disabled? 🤔
The URL TextInput is set to disabled=true, which prevents users from editing the URL. If this is intentional, it should be documented. If not, we should enable editing.
Also, consider adding error handling for the URL field similar to the display name field.
Let's check if this is consistent with other monitor configuration pages:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because jsx wasn't recognized. Let's try searching in the specific directory where we know the file exists, and we'll look for both TextInput and general URL-related patterns to understand the context better.
Let's look at the actual file content to understand the context of why the URL input is disabled and how the URL state is managed. The previous commands might have failed due to path issues, so we're trying a direct file read and a more specific search.
The URL input is correctly disabled - it's part of the monitor's identity! 🎯
Looking at the code, the disabled state is intentional and correct because:
- The URL is a core identifier for the monitor that shouldn't change after creation
- The component is part of a "Configure" page for existing monitors, not a creation page
- The URL is displayed prominently in the header with the monitor's status
- Other configurable settings like display name, notifications, and check frequency are properly editable
The error handling suggestion isn't needed since the URL field isn't editable in this context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other monitor configuration components that might have URL editing
rg -l "TextInput.*monitor.*url" --type jsx
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TextInput components with URL or monitor patterns using ripgrep
rg "TextInput.*url|TextInput.*monitor" Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/
# Also search for any URL-related input fields
rg "url.*input|input.*url" -i Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/
# Let's also check for any form handling related to URL
rg "handleUrl|setUrl|urlChange" Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/
Length of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search in the file we know exists
cat "Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/index.jsx"
# Also search for form handling or state management related to URL
rg -A 5 -B 5 "const.*url|const.*monitor" "Client/src/Pages/Monitors/Configure/index.jsx"
Length of output: 15982
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx (2)
10-11: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports for TextInput and PasswordEndAdornment are properly organized and necessary for the component updates.
Line range hint 1-1: Vomit on his sweater already: Let's verify the migration! 🔍
Let's ensure we've caught all instances of Field components that need to be replaced with TextInput.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the migration's clean like mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The search results show we're in good shape! The only Field-related imports are for Material-UI's TextField and one ImageField component, which are legitimate and different from the Field components we're concerned about. All form inputs are consistently using TextInput components across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Field components that might need migration
rg -l "import.*Field.*from" --type jsx --type tsx
# Search for consistency in TextInput usage
rg "TextInput.*error={.*\? true : false}" --type jsx --type tsx
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Field imports with proper regex escaping
rg "import.*Field.*from"
# Search for TextInput usage patterns with proper regex escaping
rg "TextInput.*error=\{.*\}"
# Let's also check for any Field component usage
rg "<Field"
# And check for TextInput component usage
rg "<TextInput"
Length of output: 3685
Client/src/Pages/Maintenance/CreateMaintenance/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint 1-585: Lose yourself in the code... it's looking good!
The integration of TextInput components is well-implemented, maintaining consistent error handling and validation throughout the form. The component structure is clean and logically organized.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 476-476: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" | ||
| type="number" | ||
| className="field-infrastructure-alert" | ||
| id={fieldId} | ||
| value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} | ||
| onBlur={onFieldBlur} | ||
| onChange={onFieldChange} | ||
| error={errors[fieldId]} | ||
| error={errors[fieldId] ? true : false} | ||
| disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} | ||
| hideErrorText={true} | ||
| ></Field> | ||
| /> | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, let's make this code cleaner than mom's spaghetti! 🍝
A few suggestions to improve this TextInput implementation:
- The boolean conversion can be simplified
- Consider adding helper text for better error feedback
<TextInput
maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)"
type="number"
id={fieldId}
value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]}
onBlur={onFieldBlur}
onChange={onFieldChange}
- error={errors[fieldId] ? true : false}
+ error={!!errors[fieldId]}
+ helperText={errors[fieldId]}
disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" | |
| type="number" | |
| className="field-infrastructure-alert" | |
| id={fieldId} | |
| value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} | |
| onBlur={onFieldBlur} | |
| onChange={onFieldChange} | |
| error={errors[fieldId]} | |
| error={errors[fieldId] ? true : false} | |
| disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} | |
| hideErrorText={true} | |
| ></Field> | |
| /> | |
| <TextInput | |
| maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" | |
| type="number" | |
| id={fieldId} | |
| value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} | |
| onBlur={onFieldBlur} | |
| onChange={onFieldChange} | |
| error={!!errors[fieldId]} | |
| helperText={errors[fieldId]} | |
| disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} | |
| /> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| error={errors.email ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.email} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Knees weak, arms heavy: Let's simplify that error handling!
The boolean conversion is unnecessary here. We can simplify this while maintaining the same functionality.
-error={errors.email ? true : false}
+error={!!errors.email}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| error={errors.email ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors.email} | |
| error={!!errors.email} | |
| helperText={errors.email} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 68-68: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| error={errors.apiBaseUrl ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.apiBaseUrl} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, let's simplify those error props!
The ternary operation in the error props is unnecessary. We can simplify this across all TextInput components.
Instead of:
error={errors.fieldName ? true : false}Use:
error={!!errors.fieldName}This change should be applied to all TextInput components in the file for consistency and cleaner code.
Also applies to: 201-202, 212-213, 223-224, 234-235, 259-260, 283-284, 294-295, 305-306, 316-317
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 169-169: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| type="number" | ||
| id="systemEmailPort" | ||
| label="System email port" | ||
| name="systemEmailPort" | ||
| value={localSettings.systemEmailPort?.toString()} | ||
| onChange={handleChange} | ||
| onBlur={handleBlur} | ||
| error={errors.systemEmailPort} | ||
| error={errors.systemEmailPort ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.systemEmailPort} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Secure those number inputs before they break, homie! 🔢
The number input fields need additional validation and safety checks:
- Port numbers should have min/max constraints
- toString() calls could fail if value is undefined
- No validation for negative numbers
Add validation and constraints:
<TextInput
type="number"
id="systemEmailPort"
label="System email port"
name="systemEmailPort"
+ min="1"
+ max="65535"
- value={localSettings.systemEmailPort?.toString()}
+ value={localSettings.systemEmailPort || ''}
onChange={handleChange}
onBlur={handleBlur}
error={!!errors.systemEmailPort}
helperText={errors.systemEmailPort}
/>Apply similar changes to redisPort and appropriate min/max for jwtTTLNum.
Also applies to: 251-260, 297-306
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 212-212: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="systemEmailPassword" | ||
| label="System email password" | ||
| name="systemEmailPassword" | ||
| value={localSettings.systemEmailPassword} | ||
| onChange={handleChange} | ||
| onBlur={handleBlur} | ||
| error={errors.systemEmailPassword} | ||
| error={errors.systemEmailPassword ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.systemEmailPassword} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Secure that password field, fam! 🔒
The system email password field is currently using type="text", which displays the password in plain text. This is a security concern.
Apply this change to enhance security:
<TextInput
- type="text"
+ type="password"
id="systemEmailPassword"
label="System email password"
name="systemEmailPassword"
value={localSettings.systemEmailPassword}
onChange={handleChange}
onBlur={handleBlur}
error={!!errors.systemEmailPassword}
helperText={errors.systemEmailPassword}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| type="text" | |
| id="systemEmailPassword" | |
| label="System email password" | |
| name="systemEmailPassword" | |
| value={localSettings.systemEmailPassword} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| error={errors.systemEmailPassword} | |
| error={errors.systemEmailPassword ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors.systemEmailPassword} | |
| <TextInput | |
| type="password" | |
| id="systemEmailPassword" | |
| label="System email password" | |
| name="systemEmailPassword" | |
| value={localSettings.systemEmailPassword} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| error={!!errors.systemEmailPassword} | |
| helperText={errors.systemEmailPassword} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 234-234: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="pagespeedApiKey" | ||
| label="PageSpeed API key" | ||
| name="pagespeedApiKey" | ||
| value={localSettings.pagespeedApiKey} | ||
| onChange={handleChange} | ||
| onBlur={handleBlur} | ||
| error={errors.pagespeedApiKey} | ||
| error={errors.pagespeedApiKey ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.pagespeedApiKey} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Protect that API key like your mom's spaghetti! 🔑
The PageSpeed API key is currently displayed in plain text, which could lead to security issues if someone looks at the user's screen.
Consider implementing a more secure approach:
<TextInput
- type="text"
+ type="password"
id="pagespeedApiKey"
label="PageSpeed API key"
name="pagespeedApiKey"
+ autoComplete="off"
value={localSettings.pagespeedApiKey}
onChange={handleChange}
onBlur={handleBlur}
error={!!errors.pagespeedApiKey}
helperText={errors.pagespeedApiKey}
/>Also, consider adding a "show/hide" toggle for better UX while maintaining security.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| type="text" | |
| id="pagespeedApiKey" | |
| label="PageSpeed API key" | |
| name="pagespeedApiKey" | |
| value={localSettings.pagespeedApiKey} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| error={errors.pagespeedApiKey} | |
| error={errors.pagespeedApiKey ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors.pagespeedApiKey} | |
| <TextInput | |
| type="password" | |
| id="pagespeedApiKey" | |
| label="PageSpeed API key" | |
| name="pagespeedApiKey" | |
| autoComplete="off" | |
| value={localSettings.pagespeedApiKey} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| error={!!errors.pagespeedApiKey} | |
| helperText={errors.pagespeedApiKey} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 316-316: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| marginBottom={theme.spacing(12)} | ||
| type="email" | ||
| id="input-team-member" | ||
| placeholder="Email" | ||
| value={toInvite.email} | ||
| onChange={handleChange} | ||
| error={errors.email} | ||
| error={errors.email ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors.email} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, we need to add that 'name' prop! 🍝
The TextInput component requires a 'name' prop according to the updated specs. Also, we can simplify the error prop expression.
Here's the fix:
<TextInput
marginBottom={theme.spacing(12)}
type="email"
id="input-team-member"
+ name="team-member-email"
placeholder="Email"
value={toInvite.email}
onChange={handleChange}
- error={errors.email ? true : false}
+ error={!!errors.email}
helperText={errors.email}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| marginBottom={theme.spacing(12)} | |
| type="email" | |
| id="input-team-member" | |
| placeholder="Email" | |
| value={toInvite.email} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| error={errors.email} | |
| error={errors.email ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors.email} | |
| <TextInput | |
| marginBottom={theme.spacing(12)} | |
| type="email" | |
| id="input-team-member" | |
| name="team-member-email" | |
| placeholder="Email" | |
| value={toInvite.email} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| error={!!errors.email} | |
| helperText={errors.email} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 348-348: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="secret" | ||
| label="Authorization secret" | ||
| value={infrastructureMonitor.secret} | ||
| onBlur={handleBlur} | ||
| onChange={handleChange} | ||
| error={errors["secret"]} | ||
| error={errors["secret"] ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors["secret"]} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, we need to beef up that secret field's security! 🔒
The authorization secret field should have additional security measures:
- Consider adding
autocomplete="new-password"to prevent browsers from auto-filling - Add
spellCheck="false"to prevent potential data leakage through spell checkers
Here's how to enhance the security:
<TextInput
type="text"
id="secret"
label="Authorization secret"
value={infrastructureMonitor.secret}
onBlur={handleBlur}
onChange={handleChange}
error={errors["secret"] ? true : false}
helperText={errors["secret"]}
+ autocomplete="new-password"
+ spellCheck="false"
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| type="text" | |
| id="secret" | |
| label="Authorization secret" | |
| value={infrastructureMonitor.secret} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| error={errors["secret"]} | |
| error={errors["secret"] ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors["secret"]} | |
| /> | |
| <TextInput | |
| type="text" | |
| id="secret" | |
| label="Authorization secret" | |
| value={infrastructureMonitor.secret} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| error={errors["secret"] ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors["secret"]} | |
| autocomplete="new-password" | |
| spellCheck="false" | |
| /> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 269-269: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
265-274: Yo, let's keep that error handling consistent! 🎵The error prop implementation differs from other TextInputs. Let's maintain consistency.
<TextInput type="text" id="name" label="Friendly name" isOptional={true} value={infrastructureMonitor.name} onBlur={handleBlur} onChange={handleChange} - error={errors["name"]} + error={!!errors["name"]} + helperText={errors["name"]} />🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Line range hint
254-284: Yo, let's level up this form's architecture! 🏗️Consider these architectural improvements:
- Extract form validation logic into a custom hook
- Implement a form context to manage state and validation
- Add loading states for each field during validation
Would you like me to help create a custom form hook to handle these improvements?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 282-282: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/index.jsx (2)
15-15: Yo dawg, this import's looking fresh! 🎯
The TextInput import aligns perfectly with our mission to phase out the Field component.
275-284:
Yo, we still need to beef up that secret field's security! 🔒
The authorization secret field should have additional security measures:
- Add
autocomplete="new-password"to prevent browsers from auto-filling - Add
spellCheck="false"to prevent potential data leakage through spell checkers
<TextInput
type="text"
id="secret"
label="Authorization secret"
value={infrastructureMonitor.secret}
onBlur={handleBlur}
onChange={handleChange}
- error={errors["secret"] ? true : false}
+ error={!!errors["secret"]}
helperText={errors["secret"]}
+ type="password"
+ autocomplete="new-password"
+ spellCheck="false"
/>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 282-282: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| <TextInput | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="url" | ||
| label="Server URL" | ||
| placeholder="https://" | ||
| value={infrastructureMonitor.url} | ||
| onBlur={handleBlur} | ||
| onChange={handleChange} | ||
| error={errors["url"]} | ||
| error={errors["url"] ? true : false} | ||
| helperText={errors["url"]} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Heads up! Let's beef up that URL validation game! 🎮
The URL input could use some enhancement:
- Add URL pattern validation
- Simplify error handling
<TextInput
type="text"
id="url"
label="Server URL"
placeholder="https://"
value={infrastructureMonitor.url}
onBlur={handleBlur}
onChange={handleChange}
- error={errors["url"] ? true : false}
+ error={!!errors["url"]}
+ pattern="https?:\/\/.+"
helperText={errors["url"]}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TextInput | |
| type="text" | |
| id="url" | |
| label="Server URL" | |
| placeholder="https://" | |
| value={infrastructureMonitor.url} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| error={errors["url"]} | |
| error={errors["url"] ? true : false} | |
| helperText={errors["url"]} | |
| /> | |
| <TextInput | |
| type="text" | |
| id="url" | |
| label="Server URL" | |
| placeholder="https://" | |
| value={infrastructureMonitor.url} | |
| onBlur={handleBlur} | |
| onChange={handleChange} | |
| error={!!errors["url"]} | |
| pattern="https?:\/\/.+" | |
| helperText={errors["url"]} | |
| /> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 262-262: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
Thanks for the review, glad to get this one in! |
This PR replaces the
Fieldcomponent withTextInputcomponent.TextInputto exposeid,onBlur, anddisabled,hidden,marginFieldcomponents withTextInputFieldcomponent 🎉This should reduce headache significantly when dealing with text input!