fix: adjusted theme settings for color fixes, references #1178 #1220
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple components related to theming and visual representation in the application. Key changes include updates to background and status colors in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ajhollid has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js (2)
26-28: Yo! Let's reconsider using border colors for disabled statesThe use of
border.dark.disabledforaction.disabledmight not provide the best visual feedback. Material-UI typically uses alpha-blended colors for disabled states to maintain visual hierarchy.Consider these alternatives:
- Use alpha-blended primary color:
alpha(theme.palette.primary.main, 0.3)- Create a dedicated disabled color in your palette
- Follow Material Design's default disabled state opacity (0.38)
Would you like me to help create a more accessible color palette for disabled states?
Line range hint
26-120: Yo dawg, let's level up this theme structure! 🎨I notice you're thinking about semantic vs. feature-based structure (see comment on line 57). Here's some architectural guidance to make this theme more maintainable:
- Consider grouping related colors into semantic tokens:
palette: { // Core semantic tokens interactive: { disabled: { background: alpha(primary.main, 0.12), text: alpha(text.primary, 0.38), border: alpha(border.dark, 0.12) } // ... other interactive states } // ... rest of your palette }
- Document the color system's principles at the top of the file
- Consider creating a theme tokens file to separate raw colors from semantic usage
Would you like me to help create a more structured theme organization that aligns with Material Design principles?
Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (2)
Line range hint
6-8: Knees weak, arms heavy - but I can help with that TODO!The TODO comment about checking palette key usage is spot on. This could help identify unused theme properties and reduce technical debt.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this task? I can help generate a script to analyze palette key usage across the codebase.
Yo, we found some spaghetti that needs attention in those error colors!
The search results show several components still using
error.contrastTextthat need to be updated toerror.main:
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/Details/Charts/PieChart.jsxuseserror.contrastTextfor stroke and text colorsClient/src/Pages/Monitors/Details/Charts/index.jsxhas multiple instances oferror.contrastTextClient/src/Components/Check/Check.jsxuseserror.contrastTextfor error stateClient/src/Components/ProgressBars/index.jsxuseserror.contrastTextfor text and fill colorsThese components should be updated to use
error.mainfor consistency with the PR changes.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
47-52: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's verify those error colour changes!The PR mentions switching from error.contrastText to error.main in charts and status labels. While the error colour configuration looks solid, we should verify this change aligns with accessibility guidelines.
Let's check the usage:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error colour usage in charts and status labels rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'theme\.palette\.error\.(main|contrastText)' -A 3Length of output: 9198
Client/src/Components/Charts/BarChart/index.jsx (3)
Line range hint
15-17: Yo, this useEffect is making me nervous, like mom's spaghetti! 🍝The useEffect hook without a dependency array will run after every render, causing unnecessary re-renders and potentially impacting performance.
Here's the fix:
useEffect(() => { setAnimate(true); -}); +}, []); // Add empty dependency array to run only once on mount
Line range hint
8-8: Lose yourself in the documentation! 📝That TODO comment's been sitting there looking lonely. Let's get you some proper prop validation and documentation to make this component more robust.
Would you like me to help generate:
- PropTypes validation
- JSDoc documentation
- TypeScript types (if your project uses TypeScript)
159-164: Don't lose yourself in these colors! 🎨While the color changes look good, relying solely on colors for status indication might not be accessible for all users, particularly those with color vision deficiencies.
Consider adding patterns or icons alongside colors:
<Box position="absolute" bottom={0} width="100%" height={`${animate ? check.responseTime : 0}%`} backgroundColor={ check.status ? theme.palette.success.main : theme.palette.error.main } sx={{ borderRadius: theme.spacing(1.5), transition: "height 600ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1)", + // Add patterns for better accessibility + backgroundImage: check.status ? 'none' : 'repeating-linear-gradient(45deg, transparent, transparent 5px, rgba(255,255,255,0.1) 5px, rgba(255,255,255,0.1) 10px)', }} />Client/src/Components/Label/index.jsx (1)
130-132: Yo! Remove that misleading comment, dawg!The comment
/* dark */next tosuccess.contrastTextis confusing and appears to be outdated. It contradicts the actual property being used. Let's keep it clean!- bgColor: theme.palette.success.contrastText /* dark */, + bgColor: theme.palette.success.contrastText,Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (1)
Line range hint
1-245: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's document this theme structure! 📚The theme structure is getting complex with multiple levels of nesting. Consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the semantic purpose of each color category
- Creating a theme structure diagram
- Addressing the existing TODOs about px usage and color palette review
Would you like me to help create a documentation template or open an issue to track these improvements?
Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (1)
Line range hint
234-244: Mom's spaghetti: Let's clean up this helper text styling! 🍜The implementation looks good but contains duplicate styling between normal and error states.
Here's a cleaner version that reduces duplication:
"& .MuiFormHelperText-root": { - color: palette.error.main, - opacity: 0.8, - fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", - marginLeft: 0, -}, -"& .MuiFormHelperText-root.Mui-error": { opacity: 0.8, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", color: palette.error.main, + marginLeft: 0, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Client/src/Components/Charts/BarChart/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Label/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js(2 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js(2 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (1)
31-33: Yo, let's double-check this against Material-UI guidelines, eh?
Using border.light.disabled for action.disabled might not follow Material-UI's conventions. The action.disabled property typically controls the opacity of disabled elements, not just their border colour.
Let's verify the MUI implementation:
Consider following Material-UI's default approach:
- Use opacity for disabled states (typically 0.38)
- Keep border colours separate from disabled state styling
✅ Verification successful
Let me dig deeper into the codebase to understand how disabled states are handled. The previous search might have been too specific, so I'm broadening it to catch any theme-related disabled state implementations.
Yo, let me dig deeper into how disabled states are actually used in the codebase. The previous searches weren't giving us the full picture, so I'm specifically looking for disabled state implementations and MUI Button usages to understand the context better.
Yo, that disabled state implementation looks solid!
The use of border.light.disabled and border.dark.disabled for action.disabled is actually following MUI's theme structure correctly. The constants.js shows proper definition of disabled states with specific colour values (gray150 for light theme and gray800 for dark theme), which aligns with MUI's theming approach.
The implementation:
- Properly defines disabled states in theme constants
- Correctly maps them to action.disabled in both light and dark themes
- Maintains consistency with MUI's theming system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other MUI theme implementations in the codebase
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -A 5 'createTheme.*action.*disabled'
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any theme-related files and their usage of disabled states
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -B 2 -A 2 'disabled.*theme|theme.*disabled'
# Also check for MUI theme customization patterns
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'createTheme|ThemeProvider'
# And specifically look for action-related theme configurations
fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx -x grep -l "action" {} \; | xargs cat
Length of output: 102418
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how disabled states are handled in MUI components and themes
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -B 2 -A 2 'disabled.*theme|theme.*disabled|disabled.*palette|palette.*disabled'
# Also search for any MUI Button or action-related component usage
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -B 2 -A 2 'Button.*disabled|disabled.*Button|action.*disabled'
Length of output: 1141
Client/src/Components/Charts/BarChart/index.jsx (1)
161-161: Yo dawg, that theme color change is on point! 🎯
Switching from theme.palette.error.contrastText to theme.palette.error.main is actually the right move here. The main color is specifically designed for primary visual indicators, while contrastText is meant for text that appears on top of error backgrounds.
Client/src/Components/Label/index.jsx (1)
134-136: Yo! Let's make sure these colors pop correctly!
The change from error.contrastText to error.main for the dot color looks good, but we should verify:
- The contrast ratio meets WCAG accessibility standards
- This color usage is consistent with other error states in the app
Let's check other error state usages:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, these error colors are actually consistent across the codebase!
After dropping some mad beats through the codebase, I can see the color scheme is actually pretty tight:
- The change from
error.contrastTexttoerror.mainfor dot color matches how it's used in other spots likeMonitors/utils.jsxandProgressBars - The
error.darkfor background anderror.lightfor borders is consistently used across components likeMonitors/utils.jsxand other labels - The theme's error palette maintains a consistent pattern:
mainfor primary indicators,darkfor backgrounds, andlightfor borders
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using error theme properties
rg -g '*.{jsx,js,tsx,ts}' "theme\.palette\.error\." --type-add 'tsx:*.{tsx,jsx}' -A 2
Length of output: 8218
Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (2)
25-25: Yo, this gray150 addition looks solid! 🎨
The new color fits nicely in the grayscale progression between gray100 (#F4F4F4) and gray200 (#E3E3E3).
Let's make sure this color isn't already defined elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, we're good to go with this gray150! 🎯
Just ran a thorough search through the codebase, and that hex value #EFEFEF is only showing up in this one spot - exactly where we want it. No duplicate definitions or conflicts to worry about, fam!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other definitions of this specific color value
rg -i "#EFEFEF" --type js --type ts
Length of output: 94
209-209: Yo dawg, we need to talk about these disabled border properties! 🤔
While the color values make sense for borders, using border-specific colors for all disabled states might not be the best approach. Consider creating a separate semantic color for disabled states in the theme structure.
Example structure:
disabled: {
border: {
light: paletteColors.gray150,
dark: paletteColors.gray800
},
background: { /* ... */ },
text: { /* ... */ }
}Let's check how disabled states are handled elsewhere:
Also applies to: 214-214
| @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ const baseTheme = (palette) => ({ | |||
| height: "var(--env-var-height-2)", | |||
| fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", | |||
| fontWeight: 400, | |||
| color: palette.text.secondary, // or any color from your palette | |||
| color: "palette.text.secondary", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo! There's a critical bug in the color property! 🍝
The color property is now a string literal instead of referencing the theme palette. This will cause the text to display as "palette.text.secondary" instead of the actual color value.
Here's the fix to get your palms less sweaty:
-color: "palette.text.secondary",
+color: palette.text.secondary,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| color: "palette.text.secondary", | |
| color: palette.text.secondary, |
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR addresses color fixes in the theme settings after a recent refactoring, specifically adjusting error colors and adding disabled border properties. The changes ensure consistent and correct color representation, enhancing user experience and maintaining visual integrity.
- Key components modified:
BarChartcomponent for error color adjustment.StatusLabelcomponent for error color adjustment.- Theme utility files (
constants.js,darkTheme.js,globalTheme.js,lightTheme.js) for adding and using new border properties.
- Impact assessment: The changes affect the visual representation of error states and disabled elements across the application.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes are primarily visual and do not introduce new system dependencies or integration impacts.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The PR introduces new border properties for disabled states in the theme utility files.
- Component interactions: The
BarChartandStatusLabelcomponents interact with the theme utility files to apply the new color properties. - Integration points: The integration points are within the theme utility files and the components that use these themes.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Components/Charts/BarChart/index.jsx - BarChart
- Submitted PR Code:
backgroundColor={ - check.status - ? theme.palette.success.main - : theme.palette.error.contrastText + check.status ? theme.palette.success.main : theme.palette.error.main }
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change updates the error color from
theme.palette.error.contrastTexttotheme.palette.error.main. This ensures consistency with the main error color but might affect readability ifcontrastTextwas specifically chosen for better contrast. - Edge cases and error handling: No specific edge cases or error handling are directly affected by this change.
- Cross-component impact: This change impacts the visual representation of error states in the
BarChartcomponent. - Business logic considerations: Ensures that error states are visually consistent with the main error color, aligning with the overall theme.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change updates the error color from
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
backgroundColor={ check.status ? theme.palette.success.main : theme.palette.error.contrastText }
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures better readability and contrast, which is crucial for accessibility and user experience.
- Business value: Maintains the visual integrity of the application, ensuring that error states are easily distinguishable.
- Risk assessment: No significant risks are introduced by reverting to the original contrastText, as it was likely chosen for better visibility.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Components/Label/index.jsx - StatusLabel
- Submitted PR Code:
const colors = { up: { dotColor: theme.palette.success.main, - bgColor: theme.palette.success./* dark */ contrastText, + bgColor: theme.palette.success.contrastText /* dark */, borderColor: theme.palette.success.main /* light */, }, down: { - dotColor: theme.palette.error.contrastText, + dotColor: theme.palette.error.main, bgColor: theme.palette.error.dark, borderColor: theme.palette.error.light, },
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change updates the error dot color from
theme.palette.error.contrastTexttotheme.palette.error.main. This ensures consistency with the main error color but might affect readability ifcontrastTextwas specifically chosen for better contrast. - Edge cases and error handling: No specific edge cases or error handling are directly affected by this change.
- Cross-component impact: This change impacts the visual representation of error states in the
StatusLabelcomponent. - Business logic considerations: Ensures that error states are visually consistent with the main error color, aligning with the overall theme.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change updates the error dot color from
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const colors = { up: { dotColor: theme.palette.success.main, bgColor: theme.palette.success.contrastText, /* dark */ borderColor: theme.palette.success.main /* light */ }, down: { dotColor: theme.palette.error.main, bgColor: theme.palette.error.dark, borderColor: theme.palette.error.light, }, }
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures better readability and contrast, which is crucial for accessibility and user experience.
- Business value: Maintains the visual integrity of the application, ensuring that error states are easily distinguishable.
- Risk assessment: No significant risks are introduced by keeping the original contrastText, as it was likely chosen for better visibility.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js - Theme Constants
- Submitted PR Code:
border: { light: { light: paletteColors.gray200, dark: paletteColors.gray800, + disabled: paletteColors.gray150, }, dark: { light: paletteColors.gray200, dark: paletteColors.gray750, + disabled: paletteColors.gray800, }, }
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: Adds
disabledproperties to the border palette for both light and dark themes. This ensures that disabled states have a consistent border color. - Edge cases and error handling: No specific edge cases or error handling are directly affected by this change.
- Cross-component impact: This change impacts all components that use disabled border colors.
- Business logic considerations: Ensures consistent visual representation of disabled states.
- Current logic and potential issues: Adds
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None.
- Improvement rationale: The change ensures consistent visual representation of disabled states.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js - Light Theme Configuration
- Submitted PR Code:
palette: { + action: { + disabled: border.light.disabled, + }, primary: { main: primary.main.light }, secondary: { main: secondary.main.light, contrastText: secondary.contrastText.light, light: secondary.dark.light, dark: secondary.dark.light, }, success: { main: success.main.light, contrastText: success.contrastText.light, },
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change adds an
action.disabledproperty to the palette, using theborder.light.disabledcolor. This ensures a consistent disabled border color for action components. - Edge cases and error handling: No specific edge cases or error handling are directly affected by this change.
- Cross-component impact: This change impacts all action components that use disabled border colors.
- Business logic considerations: Ensures consistent visual representation of disabled states for action components.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change adds an
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None.
- Improvement rationale: The change ensures consistent visual representation of disabled states for action components.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js - Dark Theme Configuration
- Submitted PR Code:
palette: { + action: { + disabled: border.dark.disabled, + }, primary: { main: primary.main.dark }, secondary: { main: secondary.main.dark, contrastText: secondary.contrastText.dark, light: secondary.dark.dark, dark: secondary.dark.dark, }, success: { main: success.main.dark, contrastText: success.contrastText.dark, },
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change adds an
action.disabledproperty to the palette, using theborder.dark.disabledcolor. This ensures a consistent disabled border color for action components. - Edge cases and error handling: No specific edge cases or error handling are directly affected by this change.
- Cross-component impact: This change impacts all action components that use disabled border colors.
- Business logic considerations: Ensures consistent visual representation of disabled states for action components.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change adds an
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None.
- Improvement rationale: The change ensures consistent visual representation of disabled states for action components.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js - Global Theme Configuration
- Submitted PR Code:
"& .MuiFormHelperText-root.Mui-error": { opacity: 0.8, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", }
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change ensures that the error text has the correct opacity and font size, enhancing readability.
- Edge cases and error handling: No specific edge cases or error handling are directly affected by this change.
- Cross-component impact: This change impacts all components that use error text.
- Business logic considerations: Ensures consistent visual representation of error text.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
"& .MuiFormHelperText-root.Mui-error": { color: palette.error.contrastText, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", }
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures better readability and contrast for error text, which is crucial for accessibility and user experience.
- Business value: Maintains the visual integrity of the application, ensuring that error messages are easily distinguishable.
- Risk assessment: No significant risks are introduced by using the contrastText, as it was likely chosen for better visibility.
- Analysis:
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis: The changes primarily affect the visual layer and do not impact data flow.
- State management implications: No state management implications are introduced by these changes.
- Error propagation paths: The changes do not introduce new error propagation paths.
- Edge case handling across components: The changes ensure consistent visual representation across components, handling edge cases related to color contrast and readability.
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis: The changes do not introduce new algorithms or data structures, so complexity analysis is not applicable.
- Performance implications: The changes do not impact performance.
- Memory usage considerations: The changes do not impact memory usage.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes are well-organized and modular, affecting only the specific components and utility files related to theme settings.
- Design patterns usage: The changes adhere to the existing design patterns used in the theme utility files.
- Error handling approach: No specific error handling is required for these changes as they are purely visual.
- Resource management: The changes do not impact resource management.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: None.
- Impact:
- Recommendation:
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: Verify the contrast of the new error colors to ensure readability.
- Potential risks: Poor readability can affect user experience and accessibility.
- Suggested improvements: Use a color contrast tool to verify the readability of the new error colors. Update the colors if necessary.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes are straightforward and easy to maintain.
- Readability issues: None.
- Performance bottlenecks: None.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: None.
- Data handling concerns: None.
- Input validation: None.
- Security best practices: None.
- Potential security risks: None.
- Mitigation strategies: None.
- Security testing requirements: None.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Verify that the new colors are applied correctly.
- Integration test requirements: Ensure that the changes do not affect other components.
- Edge case coverage: Verify the visual representation in different scenarios.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case for BarChart component
test('BarChart should apply the correct error color', () => {
const theme = { palette: { error: { main: '#ff0000' } } };
const check = { status: false, responseTime: 50 };
const { getByTestId } = render(<BarChart theme={theme} check={check} />);
const bar = getByTestId('bar-chart-bar');
expect(bar).toHaveStyle('background-color: #ff0000');
});
// Example test case for StatusLabel component
test('StatusLabel should apply the correct error dot color', () => {
const theme = { palette: { error: { main: '#ff0000' } } };
const { getByTestId } = render(<StatusLabel theme={theme} status="down" text="Error" />);
const dot = getByTestId('status-label-dot');
expect(dot).toHaveStyle('background-color: #ff0000');
});- Coverage improvements: Ensure that all components using the new border properties are tested.
- Performance testing needs: None.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the theme documentation to reflect the new border properties.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the new border properties are consistently used across the application.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: None.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes are purely visual and do not require a specific deployment strategy.
- Key operational considerations: Ensure that the new colors are consistent with the overall design system.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical changes required: None.
- Important improvements suggested:
- Verify the contrast of the new error colors to ensure readability.
- Best practices to implement:
- Add comments explaining the rationale behind the color changes.
- Update the theme documentation to reflect the new border properties.
- Cross-cutting concerns to address: None.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Continue to ensure that the theme settings are consistent with the overall design system.
- Business capability evolution: Enhance the user experience by maintaining visual integrity.
- System integration impacts: None.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
ajhollid
changed the title
| bgColor: theme.palette.success.contrastText /* dark */, | ||
| borderColor: theme.palette.success.main /* light */, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had left the light and dark commented just so we know what was there before, I think we can delete these comments (not necessarily on this pr)
| action: { | ||
| disabled: border.dark.disabled, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this action.disabled color being called anywhere? I didnt find it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this action.disabled color being called anywhere? I didnt find it
Possible I was playing around and forgot to remove it 🤔 I'll double check it as soon as I get a chance!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just had a look, this is required for the disabled borders for inputs
This PR implements some color fixes after refactoring theme
theme.palette.error.contrastText->theme.palette.error.mainfor bar chart and status labelborder.light.disabledandborder.dark.disabledproperty to the paletteborder.light.disabledandborder.dark.disabledforaction.disabled.@marcelluscaio you know the most about the theme structure so please let me know if there is a better way to resovle these issues!