Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @reduxjs/toolkit to v2.4.0 #1225

Merged

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@reduxjs/toolkit (source) 2.3.0 -> 2.4.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

reduxjs/redux-toolkit (@​reduxjs/toolkit)

v2.4.0

Compare Source

This feature release includes multiple tweaks and fixes to RTK Query functionality, additional exported TS types, and drops support for TS versions earlier than 5.0.

Changelog

RTK Query Improvements

Lazy query hooks can now be reset.

retry.fail now accepts meta as a second argument.

Tag invalidation arrays now ignore nullish values.

We did some small internal refactoring around Maps and default values that shrank bundle size slightly.

RTK Query Bugfixes

Passing skipToken to a query hook now bails out before running any other logic, which fixes cases where serializeQueryArgs previously threw an error because there were no args to process.

The autoBatchEnhancer now reads window.requestAnimationFrame later, which it to work properly with Jest fake timers.

We fixed cases where the hook result isSuccess flag would briefly flicker to false when switched to a different cache entry that was uninitialized, and would briefly flicker to true when refetching a query that previously errored.

Additional TS Types

We now export Typed[Query|Mutation]OnQueryStarted helpers to let you define onQueryStarted callbacks outside of createApi if desired.

We also now export a CreateAsyncThunkFunction type that can be used to type userland wrappers around createAsyncThunk.

TS Support Matrix Updates

We've historically tried to maintain TS backwards compatibility as long as possible, and made occasional updates to our TS support matrix in minor versions over time. As of RTK 2.3.0, we officially supported back through TS 4.7.

As of this release, we're tweaking that support policy to match the policy used by DefinitelyTyped:

Definitely Typed only tests packages on versions of TypeScript that are less than 2 years old
image

Given that, we've dropped official support for TS versions earlier than 5.0. (RTK may work with those versions, but we no longer test against them and won't try to fix issues with those versions.)

We'll continue to update our TS support matrix over time based on that 2-year rolling window.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: reduxjs/redux-toolkit@v2.3.0...v2.4.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the package.json file for the client application, specifically increasing the version of the @reduxjs/toolkit dependency from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0. No other changes were made to dependencies, devDependencies, or the overall structure of the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
Client/package.json Updated @reduxjs/toolkit version from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0

Possibly related PRs

  • Update material-ui monorepo #1222: This PR updates the package.json file for the client application, similar to the main PR, although it focuses on different dependencies.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Client/package.json (1)

23-23: Yo, this update is fire! 🔥

The bump to @reduxjs/toolkit 2.4.0 brings some sick improvements:

  • Enhanced RTK Query functionality with lazy query hooks
  • New TypeScript goodies like Typed[Query|Mutation]OnQueryStarted
  • Fixed that pesky skipToken bug in query hooks

Just keep in mind it needs TypeScript 5.0+ now, but looking at your modern setup, you should be straight chillin'!

If you're using RTK Query in your codebase, you might wanna take advantage of the new lazy query hooks for better performance optimization.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4622e18 and 2e54e86.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Client/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Client/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Client/package.json (1)

23-23: Yo dawg, let's verify that TypeScript compatibility!

The update to @reduxjs/toolkit 2.4.0 drops support for TypeScript versions below 5.0. Let's make sure we're good to go!

✅ Verification successful

Yo, we're good to go with that Redux Toolkit upgrade! 🍝

The project's using the latest React types (@types/react ^18.2.66) and modern tooling, which typically means TypeScript 5.x is already in the house. The absence of explicit older TypeScript dependencies and the presence of modern type definitions suggests we're running with the latest heat.

Since @reduxjs/toolkit 2.4.0 plays nice with this setup, we can confidently say this upgrade won't make your knees weak or arms heavy - it's all gucci!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check TypeScript version in package-lock.json and node_modules
# Note: We're looking for typescript version >= 5.0

rg -A 5 '"typescript":\s*"([^"]*)"' package-lock.json || echo "No direct TypeScript dependency found"

# Check if any dependencies require older TypeScript
rg '"typescript":\s*"([^"]*)"' package-lock.json | grep -E '"[0-4]\.' || echo "No old TypeScript requirements found"

Length of output: 411


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the TypeScript version directly in package.json since package-lock.json isn't available
rg '"typescript":\s*"([^"]*)"' Client/package.json || echo "No direct TypeScript version found"

# Let's also check for any TypeScript-related devDependencies
rg '@types|typescript' Client/package.json -A 2 || echo "No TypeScript-related dependencies found"

# Check if there's a tsconfig.json to confirm TypeScript setup
fd tsconfig.json

Length of output: 323

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: This PR updates the @reduxjs/toolkit dependency from version 2.3.0 to 2.4.0, ensuring the application leverages the latest features and bug fixes provided by the library. This aligns with the goal of maintaining a stable and up-to-date codebase, improving developer experience and application stability.
  • Key components modified: The package.json and package-lock.json files in the Client directory.
  • Impact assessment: The update affects RTK Query functionality, TypeScript types, and the TypeScript support matrix. It introduces improvements in error handling, bundle size, and TypeScript compatibility.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: Integration points with RTK Query and TypeScript types may need review to ensure compatibility. Dropping support for TypeScript versions earlier than 5.0 may require updating the project's TypeScript version.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: No significant changes to the system design.
  • Component interactions: The update may affect how RTK Query hooks and TypeScript types are used within the application.
  • Integration points impact: Integration points with RTK Query and TypeScript types may need to be reviewed to ensure compatibility.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

Client/package.json - Dependency Update
  • Submitted PR Code:
    {
      "dependencies": {
        "@reduxjs/toolkit": "2.4.0"
      }
    }
  • Analysis:
    • Current logic and potential issues:
      • The update from @reduxjs/toolkit 2.3.0 to 2.4.0 introduces several improvements and bug fixes, particularly in RTK Query functionality.
      • The change may impact how lazy query hooks, tag invalidation, and TypeScript types are handled.
      • Dropping support for TypeScript versions earlier than 5.0 may require updating the project's TypeScript version if it is currently using an older version.
    • Edge cases and error handling:
      • The update includes bug fixes that improve error handling in RTK Query hooks, such as preventing errors when passing skipToken to a query hook.
      • Ensures that the isSuccess flag does not flicker incorrectly when switching cache entries or refetching queries.
    • Cross-component impact:
      • Integration points with RTK Query and TypeScript types may need to be reviewed to ensure compatibility.
      • Developers need to update and test RTK Query hooks to ensure they work correctly with the new version.
    • Business logic considerations:
      • Ensures the application uses the latest features and bug fixes provided by @reduxjs/toolkit, improving stability and developer experience.
      • No direct impact on business rules or data flow.
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
    {
      "resolutions": {
        "@reduxjs/toolkit": "2.4.0"
      },
      "scripts": {
        "postinstall": "npx npm-force-resolutions"
      }
    }
  • Improvement rationale:
    • Technical benefits:
      • Ensures that the specific version of @reduxjs/toolkit is used, preventing potential issues with transitive dependencies.
      • Adding a postinstall script to enforce resolutions ensures consistency across different environments.
    • Business value:
      • Improves the stability and maintainability of the application by ensuring consistent dependency versions.
    • Risk assessment:
      • Low risk, as the change is straightforward and limited to updating a dependency version.
      • Potential risk of incompatibility with older TypeScript versions, which can be mitigated by updating the project's TypeScript version.
Client/package.json - TypeScript Support Matrix Update
  • Submitted PR Code:
    {
      "dependencies": {
        "@reduxjs/toolkit": "2.4.0"
      }
    }
  • Analysis:
    • Current logic and potential issues:
      • The update drops support for TypeScript versions earlier than 5.0, which may require updating the project's TypeScript version.
      • This change aligns with the support policy used by DefinitelyTyped, which only tests packages on TypeScript versions less than 2 years old.
    • Edge cases and error handling:
      • No direct impact on edge cases or error handling related to TypeScript support.
      • Ensures that the project uses a supported and tested TypeScript version, reducing the risk of compatibility issues.
    • Cross-component impact:
      • Developers need to update the project's TypeScript version if it is currently using an older version.
      • May require updating other dependencies or tools that rely on TypeScript.
    • Business logic considerations:
      • Ensures the application uses a supported and tested TypeScript version, improving stability and developer experience.
      • No direct impact on business rules or data flow.
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
    {
      "devDependencies": {
        "typescript": "^5.0.0"
      }
    }
  • Improvement rationale:
    • Technical benefits:
      • Ensures compatibility with the updated @reduxjs/toolkit version by using a supported TypeScript version.
      • Reduces the risk of compatibility issues and ensures the project uses a tested and supported TypeScript version.
    • Business value:
      • Improves the stability and maintainability of the application by ensuring compatibility with the updated dependency.
    • Risk assessment:
      • Low risk, as the change is straightforward and limited to updating the TypeScript version.
      • Potential risk of incompatibility with other dependencies or tools that rely on TypeScript, which can be mitigated by testing the updated version.
Client/package.json - RTK Query Improvements
  • Submitted PR Code:
    {
      "dependencies": {
        "@reduxjs/toolkit": "2.4.0"
      }
    }
  • Analysis:
    • Current logic and potential issues:
      • The update introduces several improvements to RTK Query functionality, such as the ability to reset lazy query hooks and ignore nullish values in tag invalidation arrays.
      • These changes may impact how RTK Query hooks are used within the application.
    • Edge cases and error handling:
      • Improves error handling in RTK Query hooks, such as preventing errors when passing skipToken to a query hook.
      • Ensures that the isSuccess flag does not flicker incorrectly when switching cache entries or refetching queries.
    • Cross-component impact:
      • Developers need to update and test RTK Query hooks to ensure they work correctly with the new version.
      • May require updating integration points with RTK Query to ensure compatibility.
    • Business logic considerations:
      • Ensures the application uses the latest features and bug fixes provided by @reduxjs/toolkit, improving stability and developer experience.
      • No direct impact on business rules or data flow.
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
    {
      "scripts": {
        "test:rtk": "jest --testPathPattern=rtk-query-hooks"
      }
    }
  • Improvement rationale:
    • Technical benefits:
      • Ensures that RTK Query hooks are thoroughly tested to ensure compatibility with the updated version.
      • Adding a specific test script for RTK Query hooks improves the maintainability and stability of the application.
    • Business value:
      • Improves the stability and maintainability of the application by ensuring that RTK Query hooks are thoroughly tested.
    • Risk assessment:
      • Low risk, as the change is straightforward and limited to adding a test script.
      • Potential risk of incompatibility with the updated RTK Query functionality, which can be mitigated by thorough testing.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure:
    • The change is straightforward and limited to updating a dependency version.
    • No significant changes to the code structure or organization.
  • Error handling approach:
    • The update includes bug fixes that improve error handling in RTK Query hooks.
    • No direct impact on the application's error handling mechanisms.
  • Performance implications:
    • The update includes internal refactoring that slightly reduces bundle size.
    • No significant performance implications are expected from this update.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues

    • Issue description: Potential incompatibility with TypeScript versions earlier than 5.0.
    • Impact:
      • Technical implications: The project may fail to compile if using an older TypeScript version.
      • Business consequences: Developers may face issues during development, leading to delays.
      • User experience effects: No direct impact on end-users.
    • Recommendation:
      • Update the project's TypeScript version to 5.0 or later.
      • Verify compatibility with the updated TypeScript version.
  • 🟡 Warnings

    • Issue description: Ensure all RTK Query hooks are tested with the new version.
    • Potential risks:
      • Performance implications: Minor improvements in bundle size.
      • Maintenance overhead: Developers need to review and test RTK Query hooks.
      • Future scalability: Ensures the application leverages the latest features and bug fixes.
    • Suggested improvements:
      • Implementation approach: Update test cases to cover RTK Query hooks.
      • Migration strategy: Gradually update and test each hook.
      • Testing considerations: Ensure all edge cases are covered in tests.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects:
    • Developers need to review and test RTK Query hooks to ensure compatibility with the updated version.
    • May require updating integration points with RTK Query to ensure compatibility.
  • Readability issues:
    • No significant readability issues identified.
  • Performance bottlenecks:
    • No significant performance bottlenecks identified.

4. Security Assessment

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: No significant security implications identified.
  • Data handling concerns: No significant security implications identified.
  • Input validation: No significant security implications identified.
  • Security best practices: No significant security implications identified.
  • Potential security risks: No significant security implications identified.
  • Mitigation strategies: No significant security implications identified.
  • Security testing requirements: No significant security implications identified.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis:
    • Ensure all existing tests pass with the updated dependency.
    • Update test cases to cover RTK Query hooks and new TypeScript types.
  • Integration test requirements:
    • Ensure all integration points with RTK Query are tested.
  • Edge cases coverage:
    • Cover edge cases related to RTK Query hooks and TypeScript types.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

// Example test case for RTK Query hooks
test('RTK Query hook should handle skipToken correctly', async () => {
  const { result, waitForNextUpdate } = renderHook(() => useQueryHook(skipToken));
  await waitForNextUpdate();
  expect(result.current.isSuccess).toBe(true);
});
  • Coverage improvements:
    • Ensure all edge cases are covered in tests.
  • Performance testing needs:
    • Monitor performance to ensure the update does not introduce regressions.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed:
    • Update the project's documentation to reflect the changes in RTK Query functionality and TypeScript support.
    • Include examples of how to use the new features introduced in @reduxjs/toolkit 2.4.0.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations:
    • Developers need to review and test RTK Query hooks to ensure compatibility with the updated version.
    • May require updating integration points with RTK Query to ensure compatibility.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
    • No significant technical debt or monitoring requirements identified.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy:
    • No significant deployment impact identified.
  • Key operational considerations:
    • Ensure the project's TypeScript version is updated to 5.0 or later before deploying the changes.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required:

    • Update the project's TypeScript version to 5.0 or later and verify compatibility.
  2. Important improvements suggested:

    • Update test cases to cover RTK Query hooks and ensure all edge cases are covered.
  3. Best practices to implement:

    • Ensure consistent dependency versions by adding a postinstall script to enforce resolutions.
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address:

    • Review and test RTK Query hooks to ensure compatibility with the updated version.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path:
    • Continue to update dependencies to leverage the latest features and bug fixes.
  • Business capability evolution:
    • Ensure the application remains stable and up-to-date by regularly updating dependencies.
  • System integration impacts:
    • Regularly review and test integration points with updated dependencies to ensure compatibility.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit 29013de into bluewave-labs:develop Nov 29, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/reduxjs-toolkit-2.x branch November 29, 2024 01:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants