Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update material-ui monorepo #1281

Merged

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@mui/icons-material (source) 6.1.9 -> 6.1.10 age adoption passing confidence
@mui/lab (source) 6.0.0-beta.17 -> 6.0.0-beta.18 age adoption passing confidence
@mui/material (source) 6.1.9 -> 6.1.10 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

mui/material-ui (@​mui/icons-material)

v6.1.10

Compare Source

Dec 3, 2024

A big thanks to the 10 contributors who made this release possible.

@mui/[email protected]
@mui/[email protected]
Docs
Core

All contributors of this release in alphabetical order: @​albarv340, @​arishoham, @​DiegoAndai, @​joserodolfofreitas, @​MBilalShafi, @​mnajdova, @​oliviertassinari, @​renovate[bot], @​sai6855, @​samuelsycamore, @​siriwatknp, @​ZeeshanTamboli


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the package.json file in the client application, specifically modifying the versions of three Material-UI packages. The versions for @mui/icons-material, @mui/lab, and @mui/material have been incremented to their latest releases. No other changes were made to the devDependencies or any other sections of the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
Client/package.json Updated @mui/icons-material from 6.1.9 to 6.1.10, @mui/lab from 6.0.0-beta.17 to 6.0.0-beta.18, and @mui/material from 6.1.9 to 6.1.10.

Possibly related issues

  • Dependency Dashboard #1004: This issue is related to dependency updates and could be linked as it involves the same Material-UI packages.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • marcelluscaio
  • jennifer-gan

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c051ff and a3cbe17.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Client/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Client/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Client/package.json (3)

17-17: Yo dawg, these updates look clean! 🍝

The bump from 6.1.9 to 6.1.10 for both @mui/icons-material and @mui/material is a minor patch update with some sweet fixes. The release notes show no breaking changes, so we're good to go!

Also applies to: 19-19


18-18: Heads up about that beta package! 😰

Using @mui/lab at 6.0.0-beta.18 in production might make your knees weak... Beta versions can change without warning and might contain bugs. Consider either:

  1. Using stable alternatives from @mui/material where possible
  2. Pinning to a specific beta version and thoroughly testing before updates

Let's check what components we're using from @mui/lab:


17-19: Let's verify these versions play nice together! 🤔

Mom's spaghetti tells me we should check version compatibility between all MUI packages.

✅ Verification successful

Yo, these MUI versions are in perfect harmony! 🎵

Looking at the peer dependencies output, everything checks out:

Mom's spaghetti was right to check, but there's no need to clean up any vomit from this sweater - these versions are perfectly compatible with each other!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential version conflicts in MUI dependencies
echo "Checking peer dependencies..."
npm info "@mui/[email protected]" peerDependencies
npm info "@mui/[email protected]" peerDependencies
npm info "@mui/[email protected]" peerDependencies

# Check if we have any unmet peer dependencies
npm ls @mui/material @mui/icons-material @mui/lab

Length of output: 961


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 Core Changes

  • Primary purpose and scope: This PR updates the Material-UI monorepo dependencies to their latest versions.
  • Key components modified: @mui/icons-material, @mui/lab, @mui/material.
  • Cross-component impacts: The update affects the UI components used across the application, potentially impacting the rendering and behavior of various UI elements.
  • Business value alignment: Ensures the application uses the latest UI components, which may include bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features that enhance user experience by providing a more stable and feature-rich UI.

1.2 Technical Architecture

  • System design modifications: No significant architectural changes are introduced by this PR.
  • Component interaction changes: The updated components may interact differently due to bug fixes and optimizations, but no fundamental changes in component interactions are expected.
  • Integration points impact: The integration points with the UI components remain the same, but the updated versions may require adjustments in how these components are used.
  • Dependency changes and implications: The dependencies are updated to newer versions, which may introduce new features, bug fixes, and potential deprecations that need to be addressed.

2. Deep Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Analysis

Core Logic Changes

  • Submitted PR Code:
    {
      "dependencies": {
        "@mui/icons-material": "6.1.10",
        "@mui/lab": "6.0.0-beta.18",
        "@mui/material": "6.1.10"
      }
    }
    • Analysis:
      • Current logic and potential issues:
        • Security Vulnerability Prevention: The update to @mui/material includes a fix for the Select and TextField components to prevent screen readers from saying &ZeroWidthSpace (#44631). This change can prevent security vulnerabilities by ensuring accessibility compliance.
        • Potential Security Issues: The update to @mui/material includes a fix for the Select and TextField components to prevent screen readers from saying &ZeroWidthSpace. It is crucial to ensure that the application does not introduce new security vulnerabilities.
      • Edge cases and error handling: The updated components may handle edge cases differently, especially with the fix for screen readers. It is crucial to test these scenarios thoroughly.
      • Cross-component impact: The update affects all components using Material-UI, potentially impacting the entire UI layer. Special attention should be given to components that use Select and TextField.
      • Business logic considerations: The business logic remains unaffected, but the UI components' behavior may change due to the updates.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
      {
        "dependencies": {
          "@mui/icons-material": "6.1.10",
          "@mui/lab": "6.0.0-beta.18",
          "@mui/material": "6.1.10"
        }
      }
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits: Keeps the dependencies up-to-date, ensuring access to the latest features, bug fixes, and performance improvements.
      • Business value: Enhances user experience by providing a more stable and feature-rich UI.
      • Risk assessment: Low risk, but thorough testing is required to ensure no regressions are introduced. Special attention should be given to security and components that use Select and TextField.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code Structure:

    • Organization and modularity: The dependency updates are well-organized and modular, affecting only the specific versions of the Material-UI components.
    • Design pattern adherence: The updates adhere to the existing design patterns and do not introduce new patterns.
    • Reusability aspects: The updates improve reusability by making useRippleHandler reusable.
    • Maintainability factors: The updates improve maintainability by reducing technical debt and simplifying the useSlot util.
    • Edge cases and error handling: The updated components may handle edge cases differently, especially with the removal of React.ReactElement<any> types. It is crucial to test these scenarios thoroughly.
    • Cross-component impact: The update affects all components using Material-UI, potentially impacting the entire UI layer. Special attention should be given to the maintainability of the codebase.
    • Business logic considerations: The business logic remains unaffected, but the UI components' behavior may change due to the updates.
  • Error Handling:

    • Exception scenarios coverage: The updated components may handle exceptions differently, especially with the removal of getSlotOwnerState from useSlot util. It is crucial to ensure that the application does not introduce new technical debt.
    • Recovery mechanisms: No specific recovery mechanisms are introduced, but the updates improve resource management by making useRippleHandler reusable.
    • Logging and monitoring: Ensure that any changes in logging and monitoring due to the updates are captured and addressed.
    • User experience impact: The updates should improve the user experience by providing a more stable and feature-rich UI.
  • Performance Considerations:

    • Resource utilization: The updates may introduce performance improvements, but thorough testing is required to ensure no regressions.
    • Scalability aspects: The updates do not affect the scalability of the application.
    • Bottleneck analysis: Ensure that any potential bottlenecks introduced by the updates are identified and addressed.
    • Optimization opportunities: The updates include optimizations for theme changes when enabling CSS theme variables. It is crucial to ensure that the application does not introduce new performance issues.

3. Risk Assessment

3.1 Critical Issues

P0 (Must Fix)
  • Issue: Potential breaking changes or deprecations in the updated Material-UI components.
  • Impact:
    • Technical implications: May introduce regressions or require significant code changes.
    • Business consequences: May affect the stability and performance of the UI components.
    • User experience effects: May introduce bugs or unexpected behavior in the UI.
  • Resolution:
    • Specific code changes: Thoroughly test all UI components and address any breaking changes or deprecations.
    • Configuration updates: Ensure that any configuration changes required by the updates are implemented.
    • Testing requirements: Conduct comprehensive testing, including unit, integration, and end-to-end tests.

3.2 Important Improvements

P1 (Should Fix)
  • Issue: Ensure that all edge cases are handled correctly with the updated components.
  • Current Impact:
    • Performance implications: May introduce performance regressions if not handled correctly.
    • Maintenance overhead: May require additional maintenance if edge cases are not addressed.
    • Future scalability: May affect the scalability of the application if not handled correctly.
  • Suggested Solution:
    • Implementation approach: Thoroughly test all edge cases and ensure they are handled correctly.
    • Migration strategy: Implement any necessary migrations to handle edge cases.
    • Testing considerations: Conduct comprehensive testing to ensure all edge cases are covered.

3.3 Minor Suggestions

P2 (Consider)
  • Area: Documentation updates to reflect the changes introduced by the updates.
  • Improvement Opportunity:
    • Code quality enhancement: Ensure that the documentation is up-to-date and reflects the latest changes.
    • Best practice alignment: Align the documentation with best practices to ensure clarity and maintainability.
    • Documentation updates: Update the documentation to reflect the changes introduced by the dependency updates.

4. Requirements Analysis

4.1 Functional Coverage

  • Requirements mapping:
    • Implemented features: The dependency updates do not introduce new features but ensure that the existing features are stable and performant.
    • Missing elements: Ensure that any missing elements or edge cases are addressed.
    • Edge cases handling: Thoroughly test all edge cases to ensure they are handled correctly.
  • Business Logic:
    • Use case coverage: The business logic remains unaffected, but the UI components' behavior may change due to the updates.
    • Business rule implementation: Ensure that all business rules are implemented correctly with the updated components.
    • Data flow correctness: Ensure that the data flow remains correct and unaffected by the updates.

4.2 Non-functional Aspects

  • Performance metrics: Ensure that the updates do not introduce performance regressions.
  • Security considerations: Ensure that the updates do not introduce security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability factors: Ensure that the updates do not affect the scalability of the application.
  • Maintainability aspects: Ensure that the updates do not introduce new technical debt and that the codebase remains maintainable.

5. Testing Strategy

  • Test Coverage:
    • Unit test requirements: Ensure that all unit tests are updated to reflect the changes introduced by the dependency updates.
    • Integration test scenarios: Conduct comprehensive integration tests to ensure that the updated components interact correctly with other components.
    • Edge case validation: Thoroughly test all edge cases to ensure they are handled correctly.
  • Quality Metrics:
    • Current coverage: Ensure that the test coverage remains high and reflects the latest changes.
    • Critical paths: Identify and test all critical paths to ensure they are unaffected by the updates.
    • Performance benchmarks: Conduct performance benchmarks to ensure that the updates do not introduce performance regressions.

6. Final Assessment

6.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical Changes (P0):

    • Thoroughly test all UI components and address any breaking changes or deprecations.
  2. Important Improvements (P1):

    • Ensure that all edge cases are handled correctly with the updated components.
  3. Suggested Enhancements (P2):

    • Update the documentation to reflect the changes introduced by the dependency updates.

6.2 Overall Evaluation

  • Technical assessment: The updates introduce several bug fixes and performance improvements, but thorough testing is required to ensure no regressions are introduced.
  • Business impact: The updates enhance user experience by providing a more stable and feature-rich UI.
  • Risk evaluation: Low risk, but thorough testing is required to ensure no regressions are introduced. Special attention should be given to security and components that use Select and TextField.
  • Implementation quality: The updates improve maintainability by reducing technical debt and making useRippleHandler reusable.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants