Update README.md #1367
Update README.md #1367
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on updating the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant README
User->>README: View project information
README-->>User: Display features, installation, contribution guidelines
User->>README: Check star count
README-->>User: Show updated star count (1300+)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 LanguageToolREADME.md[style] ~75-~75: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3619 characters long) (EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION) 🔇 Additional comments (2)README.md (2)
The excited tone with multiple exclamation marks works perfectly here - it's a README celebrating community achievements, and this kind of energy helps engage contributors. Keep that passion burning! 🧰 Tools🪛 LanguageTool[style] ~75-~75: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3619 characters long) (EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
The enthusiasm is great, but let's make sure our numbers are on point. ✅ Verification successfulYo dawg, those numbers are straight fire! 🔥 The stats are legit, fam! We've got:
Keep spittin' those facts in the README, they're 100% accurate! The enthusiasm is totally warranted with these impressive community stats. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify star count and contributor numbers
# Get repository stats
echo "Checking current stats..."
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
repos/bluewave-labs/bluewave-uptime | \
jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, contributors: .contributors_count}'
Length of output: 259 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's get the contributor count using a different API endpoint
echo "Checking contributors..."
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
repos/bluewave-labs/bluewave-uptime/contributors | \
jq 'length'
# Also let's verify the repo name is correct by checking the README
echo "Verifying repository name..."
rg -i "checkmate" README.md
Length of output: 1945 🧰 Tools🪛 LanguageTool[style] ~75-~75: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3619 characters long) (EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION) Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
Review Status: Automated Review Skipped
Dear contributor,
Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.
Analysis Result:
PR only contains documentation changes (1 files)
Technical Context:
Documentation changes typically include:
- Markdown/RST file updates
- API documentation
- Code comments
- README updates
- Documentation in /docs directory
- License and contribution files
We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.
Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the contribution @tom-doerr, and thank you for your interest in the project!
No description provided.