-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: update dockeringore #1418
fix: update dockeringore #1418
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
Review Status: Automated Review Skipped
Dear contributor,
Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.
Analysis Result:
PR contains only a single, isolated change to a configuration file (.dockerignore) with no impact on core logic, security, or cross-module dependencies. The change is well-contained and does not require automated code review.
We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.
Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a targeted modification to the Changes
The changes are minimal but strategically focused on improving Docker context management by providing more granular control over file inclusion/exclusion. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.dockerignore (1)
1-3
: Knees weak, arms heavy: Consider adding more security patterns 💪While we're updating the .dockerignore, consider adding these common patterns to prevent sensitive files from sneaking into the image:
Client/node_modules/ Server/node_modules/ Server/*.env +**/*.key +**/*.pem +**/*.cert +**/*.secret +**/*credentials* +**/.git +**/.gitignore
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.dockerignore
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.dockerignore (2)
1-3
: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's verify our Docker build context! 🍜
The change looks good but let's make sure we're not accidentally including any sensitive files in the Docker context.
Let's run this check:
✅ Verification successful
Yo! The .dockerignore is serving up the right sauce! 🍝
The .dockerignore
is properly configured to exclude sensitive files:
Server/*.env
pattern will catch any environment files- No
.env
files were found in the current codebase - While we found many files containing sensitive-looking patterns, they're mostly test files, schemas, and templates - the actual sensitive data would be in the
.env
files which are properly ignored
Keep your palms dry knowing that your Docker build context won't be spilling any secrets!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Test Docker build context to verify .env exclusion
echo "FROM scratch" > Dockerfile.test
docker build --no-cache -f Dockerfile.test . -t test 2>/dev/null || true
docker build --no-cache -f Dockerfile.test . -t test 2>&1 | grep -i "sending build context"
Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any .env files in the Server directory
echo "Checking for .env files in Server directory:"
fd -H ".env$" Server/
# Let's also verify the Dockerfile to understand the build context
echo -e "\nChecking Dockerfile contents:"
fd -g "Dockerfile*" --type f --exec cat {}
# Let's check if there are any other potential sensitive patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for potential sensitive patterns:"
fd -H -e env -e config -e secret -e key Server/
Length of output: 742
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any .env files and sensitive patterns in the Server directory
echo "Checking for sensitive files:"
fd . Server/ -H -e env -e config -e secret -e key
# Let's also check if there are any environment-related files that might be missed
echo -e "\nChecking for environment-related patterns:"
rg -l "(?i)(api_key|secret|password|token|credential)" Server/
Length of output: 1784
3-3
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, this pattern needs more sauce! 🍝
While Server/*.env
works for the root level, it won't catch .env files in subdirectories. Consider using Server/**/*.env
for maximum protection against accidental env file inclusion.
-Server/*.env
+Server/**/*.env
Let's check if there are any sneaky .env files hiding in subdirectories:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command didn't give us results, so I'm checking the directory structure and any config files that might reference .env patterns to understand the context better. This will help us determine if the .dockerignore pattern needs to be more specific or if the current one is sufficient.
Yo, the current pattern's got the right flow! 🍝
After dropping some mad investigation beats, I can see that the Server/*.env
pattern is actually perfect for this situation, eh! Here's why:
- The Server directory structure shows a clean organization with no nested config directories
- All environment-related config handling is done through proper services (like settingsService)
- The Docker setup already handles env files appropriately through docker-compose files
The original suggestion to use Server/**/*.env
would be overkill since the codebase follows a flat structure for config files. The current pattern Server/*.env
is straight fire! 🔥
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all .env files in Server directory to ensure pattern catches everything
fd -H ".env$" Server/
Length of output: 23
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Server directory structure first
fd . Server/
# Also check for any files that might contain environment-related patterns
rg -l "\.env" --type-add 'config:*.{json,js,ts,yaml,yml}' -t config
Length of output: 4557
This PR updates the
.dockerignore
file to ignore the.env
config file in theServer
dir when copying folders to build the docker image.