feat: be/consistent response middleare #1591
Conversation
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
Large PR Notification
Dear contributor,
Thank you for your substantial contribution to this project. LlamaPReview has detected that this Pull Request contains a large volume of changes, which exceeds our current processing capacity.
Details:
- PR and related contents total size: Approximately 52,165 characters
- Current limit: 50,000 characters
Next steps:
- Consider breaking this PR into smaller, more focused changes if possible.
- For manual review, please reach out to your team members or maintainers.
We appreciate your understanding and commitment to improving this project. Your contributions are valuable, and we want to ensure they receive the attention they deserve.
LlamaPReview is continuously evolving to better serve the community. Share your thoughts on handling large PRs in our GitHub Discussions - your feedback helps us improve and expand our capabilities.
If you have any questions or need assistance, our community and support team are here to help.
Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of response handling across multiple server-side controllers and middleware. A new Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
Client->>Express Server: HTTP Request
Express Server->>ResponseHandler: Apply middleware
ResponseHandler-->>Response: Add custom methods
Response->>Controller: Process request
Controller-->>Response: Generate response
Response->>Client: Send standardized response
The sequence diagram illustrates how the new Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Server/controllers/maintenanceWindowController.js (1)
Line range hint
31-47: Lose yourself in the transactions - we need better error handling! 🎤The Promise.all() call for DB transactions needs proper error handling and rollback capability.
Consider implementing a transaction wrapper:
-const dbTransactions = monitorIds.map((monitorId) => { +const session = await this.db.startSession(); +try { + await session.startTransaction(); + const dbTransactions = monitorIds.map((monitorId) => { return this.db.createMaintenanceWindow({ teamId, monitorId, name: req.body.name, active: req.body.active ? req.body.active : true, repeat: req.body.repeat, start: req.body.start, end: req.body.end, + session, }); -}); -await Promise.all(dbTransactions); + }); + await Promise.all(dbTransactions); + await session.commitTransaction(); +} catch (error) { + await session.abortTransaction(); + throw error; +} finally { + session.endSession(); +}
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
Server/controllers/statusPageController.js (1)
Line range hint
1-52: Yo, these changes are straight fire! 🔥The refactoring to use the new response middleware is a solid architectural improvement. It:
- Makes the response format consistent across all endpoints
- Centralizes success message handling
- Removes duplicate response structure code
- Makes the API more predictable for frontend consumers
Keep this style consistent across other controllers too!
Server/controllers/queueController.js (1)
14-14: Knees weak, code's heavy - let's make these returns steady! 🎯The use of
returnstatements withres.success()is inconsistent across methods.getMetricsdoesn't usereturnwhile the other methods do. Since we're not using the return value, we should be consistent and remove unnecessaryreturnstatements.Make it consistent across all methods:
- return res.success({ + res.success({Also applies to: 27-27, 40-40, 52-52
Server/middleware/responseHandler.js (2)
1-8: Yo dawg, let's make this response handler consistent!The success method implementation has inconsistent object property shorthand usage. Line 5 uses the long form
msg: msgwhile other properties could benefit from the same consistency.- msg: msg, - data: data, + msg, + data,
1-18: Knees weak, arms heavy: Let's type-check this middleware!Consider adding TypeScript or JSDoc type definitions for better integration with Express types. This would help catch potential issues at compile time and improve IDE support.
/** * @typedef {Object} ResponseOptions * @property {number} [status=200] - HTTP status code * @property {string} [msg="OK"] - Response message * @property {any} [data=null] - Response payload */ /** * @param {import('express').Request} req * @param {import('express').Response} res * @param {import('express').NextFunction} next */Server/controllers/inviteController.js (2)
Line range hint
22-35: Lose yourself in the documentation!The JSDoc is missing the return type for the success response structure.
* @returns {Object} The response object with a success status, a message indicating the sending of the invitation, and the invitation token. +* @returns {Object} Returns res.success() with { msg: string, data: { token: string } }
87-91: Mom's spaghetti code: Handle email errors properly!Consider using the error response handler for email sending failures instead of just logging them.
- .catch((error) => { - logger.error({ - message: error.message, - service: SERVICE_NAME, - method: "issueInvitation", - stack: error.stack, - }); - }); + .catch((error) => { + next(handleError(error, SERVICE_NAME, "issueInvitation")); + return; + });Server/utils/messages.js (1)
Line range hint
76-91: These success messages be spittin' straight fire! 🔥The new success messages maintain consistent formatting and provide clear feedback. However, some messages could be more specific about the action performed.
Consider enhancing these messages with more context:
- AUTH_CREATE_USER: "User created successfully", + AUTH_CREATE_USER: "User account created and ready for login", - AUTH_LOGIN_USER: "User logged in successfully", + AUTH_LOGIN_USER: "User authenticated and session created successfully",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
Server/controllers/authController.js(11 hunks)Server/controllers/checkController.js(6 hunks)Server/controllers/controllerUtils.js(1 hunks)Server/controllers/inviteController.js(3 hunks)Server/controllers/maintenanceWindowController.js(6 hunks)Server/controllers/monitorController.js(15 hunks)Server/controllers/queueController.js(4 hunks)Server/controllers/settingsController.js(2 hunks)Server/controllers/statusPageController.js(2 hunks)Server/index.js(2 hunks)Server/middleware/handleErrors.js(1 hunks)Server/middleware/responseHandler.js(1 hunks)Server/utils/messages.js(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Server/middleware/handleErrors.js (1)
14-17: Straight fire error handling! 🔥Clean implementation using the new response handler while maintaining comprehensive error logging.
Server/controllers/controllerUtils.js (1)
16-23: Vomit on his sweater already: Let's verify error handling!The removal of try-catch simplifies the code, but we should verify that all callers properly handle the potential errors:
- URL parsing errors
- SSL checker failures
- Certificate validation errors
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, error handling is tight like mom's spaghetti!
The error handling is solid and well-tested:
- All errors are caught in monitorController's try-catch block
- Proper error middleware handles different failure scenarios
- Comprehensive test coverage for all error cases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all usages of fetchMonitorCertificate to verify error handling rg -l "fetchMonitorCertificate" | xargs rg -A 10 "fetchMonitorCertificate"Length of output: 11854
Server/controllers/inviteController.js (1)
68-71: Success response looking clean! 👌Good use of standardized success messages from utils.
Server/index.js (1)
276-277: Yo dawg, that middleware placement is on point! 🎯The responseHandler middleware is strategically positioned after Swagger UI setup but before route definitions, ensuring consistent response handling across all API endpoints.
Server/controllers/checkController.js (1)
37-41: Mom's spaghetti moment: This response is clean and ready! 🍝The new response format using
res.success()is clean and consistent.Server/controllers/authController.js (1)
156-158: Straight fire error handling! 🔥Consistent setting of 401 status for authentication failures improves API reliability.
Also applies to: 187-187
Server/controllers/settingsController.js (1)
15-15: Clean as mom's spaghetti! 👌Excellent security practice removing the sensitive
jwtSecretbefore sending the response.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 15-15: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
| return res.successs({ | ||
| msg: successMessages.STATUS_PAGE_BY_URL, | ||
| data: statusPage, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same typo alert in the second method!
The same spelling mistake appears here too. Gotta keep it consistent with the middleware implementation.
- return res.successs({
+ return res.success({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return res.successs({ | |
| msg: successMessages.STATUS_PAGE_BY_URL, | |
| data: statusPage, | |
| }); | |
| return res.success({ | |
| msg: successMessages.STATUS_PAGE_BY_URL, | |
| data: statusPage, | |
| }); |
| return res.successs({ | ||
| msg: successMessages.STATUS_PAGE_CREATE, | ||
| data: statusPage, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, fix that typo in res.successs!
There's a typo in the method name - it's spelled with an extra 's'. This needs to be fixed to prevent runtime errors.
- return res.successs({
+ return res.success({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return res.successs({ | |
| msg: successMessages.STATUS_PAGE_CREATE, | |
| data: statusPage, | |
| }); | |
| return res.success({ | |
| msg: successMessages.STATUS_PAGE_CREATE, | |
| data: statusPage, | |
| }); |
| @@ -11,8 +11,7 @@ class JobQueueController { | |||
| getMetrics = async (req, res, next) => { | |||
| try { | |||
| const metrics = await this.jobQueue.getMetrics(); | |||
| res.status(200).json({ | |||
| success: true, | |||
| res.successs({ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, there's a typo that's making me lose my spaghetti! 🍝
There's a typo in the response method - it's spelled with three 's' characters (successs). This will cause runtime errors as the method doesn't exist. The correct spelling should be success.
Fix this in all occurrences:
- res.successs({
+ res.success({Also applies to: 27-27, 40-40, 52-52
| return res.successs({ | ||
| msg: successMessages.QUEUE_GET_METRICS, | ||
| data: jobs, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mom's spaghetti moment - we've got a message mix-up! 🤔
The getJobs method is using QUEUE_GET_METRICS as its success message, but this appears to be incorrect. It should probably be using a more appropriate message like QUEUE_GET_JOBS.
Fix the message constant:
return res.success({
- msg: successMessages.QUEUE_GET_METRICS,
+ msg: successMessages.QUEUE_GET_JOBS,
data: jobs,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| res.error = ({ status = 500, msg = "Internal server erro", data = null }) => { | ||
| return res.status(status).json({ | ||
| success: false, | ||
| msg, | ||
| data, | ||
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mom's spaghetti alert: Fix that typo in the error message!
There's a typo in the default error message: "Internal server erro" should be "Internal server error". This could confuse users when they see error responses.
- res.error = ({ status = 500, msg = "Internal server erro", data = null }) => {
+ res.error = ({ status = 500, msg = "Internal server error", data = null }) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| res.error = ({ status = 500, msg = "Internal server erro", data = null }) => { | |
| return res.status(status).json({ | |
| success: false, | |
| msg, | |
| data, | |
| }); | |
| }; | |
| res.error = ({ status = 500, msg = "Internal server error", data = null }) => { | |
| return res.status(status).json({ | |
| success: false, | |
| msg, | |
| data, | |
| }); | |
| }; |
|
|
||
| return res.success({ | ||
| msg: successMessages.CHECK_DELETE, | ||
| data: { deletedCount }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, we need to handle edge cases here! 🎯
The deleteChecks method should verify the deletedCount before sending a success response.
const deletedCount = await this.db.deleteChecks(req.params.monitorId);
+if (deletedCount === 0) {
+ return res.error({
+ msg: errorMessages.DB_DELETE_CHECKS(req.params.monitorId),
+ });
+}
return res.success({Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -449,8 +437,7 @@ class MonitorController { | |||
| monitor.isActive = !monitor.isActive; | |||
| monitor.status = undefined; | |||
| monitor.save(); | |||
| return res.status(200).json({ | |||
| success: true, | |||
| return res.ssuccess({ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mom's spaghetti alert! There's a typo in your response method!
Fix the typo in the response method name from ssuccess to success.
- return res.ssuccess({
+ return res.success({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return res.ssuccess({ | |
| return res.success({ |
| return res.success({ | ||
| success: true, | ||
| msg: successMessages.MONITOR_STATS_BY_ID, | ||
| data: monitorStats, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, we heard you like success, but you don't need to double up!
Remove the redundant success: true field since res.success() already handles the success status.
return res.success({
- success: true,
msg: successMessages.MONITOR_STATS_BY_ID,
data: monitorStats,
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return res.success({ | |
| success: true, | |
| msg: successMessages.MONITOR_STATS_BY_ID, | |
| data: monitorStats, | |
| return res.success({ | |
| msg: successMessages.MONITOR_STATS_BY_ID, | |
| data: monitorStats, |
| @@ -13,8 +13,7 @@ class SettingsController { | |||
| try { | |||
| const settings = { ...(await this.settingsService.getSettings()) }; | |||
| delete settings.jwtSecret; | |||
| return res.status(200).json({ | |||
| success: true, | |||
| return res.successs({ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Knees weak, arms heavy, there's a typo in your API!
Fix the typo in the response method name from successs to success.
- return res.successs({
+ return res.success({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return res.successs({ | |
| return res.success({ |
This PR adds a resonse handling middleware to enforce consistent network responses from the Server. This will help with future collaboration as there is a clearly defined method of creating and returning responses.
Consistency will be key in creating a predictable API, which will lead to better handling of resonses on the front end.