-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat/infra monitor details request #1177
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
(2 hunks)Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js
(1 hunks)Server/validation/joi.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (1)
192-196
: Heads up! These params might make your knees weak and arms heavy!
Setting both limit
and numToDisplay
to null
could result in fetching an unnecessarily large dataset, especially with dateRange: "all"
. Consider:
- Implementing pagination or virtual scrolling for large datasets
- Adding error handling for timeout/memory issues
- Validating response data structure
Let's check the API implementation to understand the impact:
Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js (1)
201-209
: Consider performance implications and add validation
The addition of the 'all' option using epoch time could impact performance when querying large datasets. Consider the following improvements:
- Add validation for invalid date ranges
- Consider implementing pagination or chunking for large date ranges
- Add caching mechanism for frequently accessed date ranges
Here's a suggested improvement:
const getDateRange = (dateRange) => {
+ if (!Object.keys(startDates).includes(dateRange)) {
+ throw new Error(`Invalid date range: ${dateRange}`);
+ }
const startDates = {
day: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 1)),
week: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 7)),
month: new Date(new Date().setMonth(new Date().getMonth() - 1)),
all: new Date(0),
};
+ // Consider caching for large date ranges
+ const key = `date_range_${dateRange}`;
+ const cached = cache.get(key);
+ if (cached) return cached;
+
return {
start: startDates[dateRange],
end: new Date(),
};
};
Let's verify the usage of this function across the codebase:
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ const InfrastructureDetails = () => { | |||
]; | |||
const [monitor, setMonitor] = useState(null); | |||
const { authToken } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); | |||
const [dateRange, setDateRange] = useState("day"); | |||
const [dateRange, setDateRange] = useState("all"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yo dawg, your useEffect's dependency array is emptier than mom's spaghetti!
The dateRange state is initialized but changes to it won't trigger a data refetch because it's not included in the useEffect's dependency array.
Add dateRange to the dependency array:
- }, []);
+ }, [dateRange, authToken, monitorId]);
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ const getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation = joi.object({ | |||
status: joi.string(), | |||
limit: joi.number(), | |||
sortOrder: joi.string().valid("asc", "desc"), | |||
dateRange: joi.string().valid("day", "week", "month"), | |||
dateRange: joi.string().valid("day", "week", "month", "all"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Yo, we got a schema mismatch that's heavier than mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The verification confirms inconsistency in dateRange validation across different endpoints:
getMonitorStatsById
: Accepts "day", "week", "month", "all"getChecks
andgetTeamChecks
: Only accept "day", "week", "month"
These endpoints are actively used in their respective controllers and the validation mismatch could cause confusion. Either:
- Update all schemas to include "all" for consistency
- Or document why
getMonitorStatsById
is special and needs the extra option
• Server/validation/joi.js: Update getChecksQueryValidation
and getTeamChecksQueryValidation
schemas
• Server/controllers/checkController.js: Both getChecks
and getTeamChecks
endpoints will be affected
🔗 Analysis chain
Yo dawg, the change looks good but we got some consistency issues! 🍝
The addition of "all" as a valid dateRange option aligns with the PR objectives. However, other validation schemas that use dateRange haven't been updated to include this option.
Let's check for potential impacts:
Consider updating these schemas for consistency:
- getChecksQueryValidation
- getTeamChecksQueryValidation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all validation schemas using dateRange to ensure consistency
# Search for validation schemas with dateRange
echo "Searching for validation schemas with dateRange..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 'dateRange:\s*joi\.string\(\)\.valid\('
# Search for usages of these validation schemas
echo "Searching for API endpoints using these schemas..."
rg -l 'getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation|getChecksQueryValidation|getTeamChecksQueryValidation'
Length of output: 1758
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these validation schemas are actually used in the controllers
echo "Checking monitor controller usage..."
rg -B 3 -A 3 'getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation' Server/controllers/monitorController.js
echo "\nChecking check controller usage..."
rg -B 3 -A 3 'getChecksQueryValidation|getTeamChecksQueryValidation' Server/controllers/checkController.js
Length of output: 1689
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR introduces an "all" parameter to the
getMonitorStatsById
function to return all checks. It also updates the network request on the details page to use the correct query parameters. This enhances the capability to retrieve comprehensive monitor data, providing users with more detailed insights. - Key components modified:
Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js
Server/validation/joi.js
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
- Impact assessment: The changes affect both the server-side logic for handling date ranges and the client-side network request to fetch monitor statistics.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: Changes in the server-side logic and validation schema ensure data integrity and proper handling of the new parameter.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: Addition of a new date range parameter ("all") impacts how data is queried and fetched.
- Component interactions: The client-side network request now includes the new parameter, ensuring proper data retrieval.
- Integration points: Changes in the server-side logic and validation schema ensure data integrity and proper handling of the new parameter.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
[File Path] - Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js
-
Submitted PR Code:
const getDateRange = (dateRange) => { const startDates = { day: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 1)), week: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 7)), month: new Date(new Date().setMonth(new Date().getMonth() - 1)), all: new Date(0), }; return { start: startDates[dateRange], end: new Date(), }; };
-
Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The addition of the "all" parameter correctly sets the start date to the epoch (
new Date(0)
), ensuring all checks are included. - Potential issues include handling extremely large datasets and invalid
dateRange
values.
- The addition of the "all" parameter correctly sets the start date to the epoch (
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The function should handle cases where
dateRange
is not one of the predefined values.
- The function should handle cases where
- **Cross-component impact **:
- This change impacts how data is queried and sent to the client.
- **Business logic considerations **:
- Ensures comprehensive data retrieval for detailed monitoring.
- Current logic and potential issues:
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const getDateRange = (dateRange) => { const startDates = { day: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 1)), week: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 7)), month: new Date(new Date().setMonth(new Date().getMonth() - 1)), all: new Date(0), }; if (!startDates[dateRange]) { throw new Error(`Invalid dateRange: ${dateRange}`); } return { start: startDates[dateRange], end: new Date(), }; };
- **Improvement rationale **:
- Technical benefits:
- Ensures robust error handling for invalid
dateRange
values.
- Ensures robust error handling for invalid
- Business value:
- Prevents incorrect data retrieval and potential system errors.
- Risk assessment:
- Minimal risk as it adds error handling without altering core logic.
- Technical benefits:
- **Improvement rationale **:
[File Path] - Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
-
Submitted PR Code:
const [dateRange, setDateRange] = useState("all"); const fetchData = async () => { try { const response = await networkService.getStatsByMonitorId({ authToken: authToken, monitorId: monitorId, sortOrder: "asc", limit: null, dateRange: dateRange, numToDisplay: null, normalize: false, }); setMonitor(response.data.data); } catch (error) { console.error(error); } };
-
Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
dateRange
is now set to "all" by default, aligning with the new server-side logic. - The
fetchData
function correctly includes the new parameters.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- Error handling is present but could be enhanced with user notifications.
- **Cross-component impact **:
- This change ensures the client correctly requests all data from the server.
- **Business logic considerations **:
- Ensures comprehensive data display for users.
- Current logic and potential issues:
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const fetchData = async () => { try { const response = await networkService.getStatsByMonitorId({ authToken: authToken, monitorId: monitorId, sortOrder: "asc", limit: null, dateRange: dateRange, numToDisplay: null, normalize: false, }); setMonitor(response.data.data); } catch (error) { console.error(error); notifyUser("Error fetching data. Please try again later."); } };
- **Improvement rationale **:
- Technical benefits:
- Enhances user experience by providing feedback on errors.
- Business value:
- Improves user satisfaction and trust in the system.
- Risk assessment:
- Minimal risk as it adds user notifications without altering core logic.
- Technical benefits:
- **Improvement rationale **:
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis:
- Data flow is correctly handled from server to client.
- State management implications:
- The new parameter and validation logic can be reused in other parts of the system.
- Error propagation paths:
- Basic error handling is present but can be improved.
- Edge case handling across components:
- Limited handling of invalid
dateRange
values.
- Limited handling of invalid
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis:
- Querying all data may impact performance for large datasets.
- Performance implications:
- The system should be tested for scalability under heavy data loads.
- Memory usage considerations:
- Potential memory usage issues should be considered for large datasets.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure:
- The changes are well-organized and modular, affecting only the relevant files.
- Design patterns usage:
- The changes adhere to existing design patterns and conventions.
- Error handling approach:
- Basic error handling is present but can be improved with comprehensive user notifications.
- Resource management:
- The code is easy to read and understand, with clear separation of concerns.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
Critical Issues:
- Issue: Lack of comprehensive error handling in
fetchData
. - Impact:
- Technical implications:
- Potential for unhandled errors leading to system instability.
- Business consequences:
- Negative user experience due to lack of feedback on errors.
- User experience effects:
- Users may be unaware of data fetching failures.
- Technical implications:
- Recommendation:
- Specific code changes:
- Add user notifications for fetch errors.
- Configuration updates:
- None required.
- Testing requirements:
- Test error scenarios to ensure proper user notifications.
- Specific code changes:
- Issue: Lack of comprehensive error handling in
-
Warnings:
- Issue: Potential performance impact of querying all data.
- Potential risks:
- Performance implications:
- Large datasets may cause performance degradation.
- Maintenance overhead:
- Increased complexity in handling large data volumes.
- Future scalability:
- Potential bottlenecks as the system scales.
- Performance implications:
- Suggested improvements:
- Implementation approach:
- Implement pagination or lazy loading for large datasets.
- Migration strategy:
- Gradually introduce pagination based on data volume.
- Testing considerations:
- Test with large datasets to ensure performance and usability.
- Implementation approach:
4. Security Assessment
4.1 Security Considerations
- Authentication/Authorization impacts:
- No immediate security concerns identified.
- Data handling concerns:
- Data flow is correctly handled from server to client.
- Input validation:
- Validation is in place to handle the new parameter.
- Security best practices:
- The changes adhere to existing security best practices.
4.2 Vulnerability Analysis
- Potential security risks:
- None identified.
- Mitigation strategies:
- Continue adhering to security best practices.
- Security testing requirements:
- Ensure comprehensive security testing during CI/CD.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis:
- Test the
getDateRange
function for valid and invalid inputs. - Test the
fetchData
function for different scenarios, including errors.
- Test the
- Integration test scenarios:
- Test the integration between client and server with the new parameter.
- Edge cases coverage:
- Validate edge cases such as large datasets and invalid inputs.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Unit test for getDateRange
describe('getDateRange', () => {
it('should return correct start date for "all"', () => {
const { start, end } = getDateRange('all');
expect(start.getTime()).toBe(0);
expect(end).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
});
it('should throw an error for invalid dateRange', () => {
expect(() => getDateRange('invalid')).toThrow('Invalid dateRange: invalid');
});
});
// Integration test for fetchData
describe('fetchData', () => {
it('should fetch data successfully', async () => {
// Mock networkService.getStatsByMonitorId to return a successful response
const mockResponse = { data: { data: 'mockData' } };
networkService.getStatsByMonitorId = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);
await fetchData();
expect(setMonitor).toHaveBeenCalledWith('mockData');
});
it('should notify user on fetch error', async () => {
// Mock networkService.getStatsByMonitorId to throw an error
networkService.getStatsByMonitorId = jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Fetch error'));
await fetchData();
expect(notifyUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Error fetching data. Please try again later.');
});
});
- Coverage improvements:
- Ensure comprehensive test coverage for new changes.
- Performance testing needs:
- Benchmark performance with large datasets to identify bottlenecks.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed:
- Update documentation to reflect the new parameter and usage.
- Long-term maintenance considerations:
- Consider maintenance implications of handling large datasets.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
- Enhance logging and monitoring for better debugging and traceability.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy:
- Ensure the deployment process includes the new parameter and validation logic.
- Key operational considerations:
- Plan for rollback in case of issues with the new parameter.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- Add comprehensive error handling and user notifications in
fetchData
.
- Add comprehensive error handling and user notifications in
-
Important improvements suggested:
- Implement pagination or lazy loading for large datasets to improve performance.
-
Best practices to implement:
- Enhance logging and monitoring for better debugging and traceability.
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Ensure robust error handling for invalid
dateRange
values.
- Ensure robust error handling for invalid
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path:
- Gradually introduce pagination based on data volume.
- Business capability evolution:
- Enhance user insights by providing comprehensive monitor data.
- System integration impacts:
- Ensure proper integration between client and server with the new parameter.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Utils/Logger.js (3)
Line range hint
2-2
: Yo! Consider environment-specific default log levelsHaving "debug" as the default log level might spill too much tea in production environments. Consider setting different defaults based on the environment.
-const LOG_LEVEL = import.meta.env.VITE_APP_LOG_LEVEL || "debug"; +const LOG_LEVEL = import.meta.env.VITE_APP_LOG_LEVEL || (import.meta.env.PROD ? "error" : "debug");
47-54
: The debug level implementation looks clean, but let's validate those levels!The new debug level is implemented well, but we should add validation for log levels coming from the Redux store to prevent any funky business.
updateLogLevel(logLevel) { + const VALID_LEVELS = ["none", "error", "warn", "info", "debug"]; + if (!VALID_LEVELS.includes(logLevel)) { + console.warn(`Invalid log level "${logLevel}". Defaulting to "error"`); + logLevel = "error"; + } + if (logLevel === "none") {
Yo, there's no cleanup call in sight - that's a real memory leak delight!
The Logger instance is created as a singleton and imported across multiple components, but there's no cleanup happening anywhere. The
cleanup()
method exists but isn't being called, which means the Redux store subscription (this.unsubscribe
) is never properly cleaned up.
Client/src/Utils/Logger.js
: The singleton logger is created and exported but never cleaned up- Multiple components import and use the logger but none implement cleanup
- The Redux subscription will persist even when components unmount
To fix this spaghetti situation:
- Consider moving the logger to a React context provider
- Implement cleanup in the provider's cleanup phase
- Or refactor to avoid subscriptions altogether and use Redux selectors instead
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
56-60
: Mom's spaghetti warning: Potential memory leak!The cleanup method is solid, but there's no guarantee it's being called. Consider using a WeakRef or implementing automatic cleanup in modern frameworks.
Let's check if cleanup is properly called:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Logger instantiation and cleanup patterns echo "Searching for Logger usage patterns..." rg -A 5 "new Logger\(\)" rg "cleanup.*Logger"Length of output: 1208
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check where Logger is used and if cleanup is called in component unmounting or disposal echo "Searching for Logger imports and cleanup patterns..." rg -B 2 -A 5 "import.*Logger" rg -B 2 -A 5 "useEffect.*cleanup" rg -B 2 -A 5 "componentWillUnmount.*cleanup" # Let's also check the Logger class implementation echo "Checking Logger implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'class Logger { $$$ }'Length of output: 23343
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
(3 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Logger.js
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
This PR adds an "all" parameter to the
getMonitorStatsById
to return all checks. It alos updates the network request on the details page.