Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat/infra monitor details request #1177

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

ajhollid
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds an "all" parameter to the getMonitorStatsById to return all checks. It alos updates the network request on the details page.

  • Add "all" parameter and validation for date range
  • Update Infra Monitor Details network request to use correct query params

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The head commit changed during the review from 6363fa7 to 6dab90f.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the InfrastructureDetails component and related backend functions to enhance the handling of the dateRange parameter. The default value for dateRange is changed from "day" to "all" in the frontend component. Additionally, the data fetching logic is updated, including changes to sorting and display parameters. The backend functions are modified to accept the new "all" value for the dateRange, expanding the range of date queries. Validation schemas are also updated to reflect this new option.

Changes

File Change Summary
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx Updated dateRange default value to "all", modified sortOrder, numToDisplay, and normalize parameters in data fetching logic.
Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js Expanded getDateRange function to accept "all" as a valid dateRange parameter and updated startDates object accordingly.
Server/validation/joi.js Modified getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation schema to include "all" as a valid option for the dateRange field.

Possibly related PRs

  • Pagespeed dashboard revamp #841: The changes in the main PR regarding the dateRange state variable and its handling in the InfrastructureDetails component relate to the updates in the getDateRange function in monitorModule.js, which now accepts the value "all" for the dateRange parameter.
  • Remove checks from monitor query #844: The modification of the dateRange parameter in the main PR aligns with the changes in the getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation schema in joi.js, which now includes "all" as a valid option for dateRange.
  • Add ssl-checker, refactor fetchMonitorCertificate #975: The changes in the main PR regarding data fetching and the dateRange state variable are relevant to the updates in the fetchMonitorCertificate function, which may also involve similar data handling processes.
  • Feat/be/monitor module refactor #1114: The introduction of the getDateRange function in the monitorModule.js is directly related to the changes in the main PR that involve the dateRange state variable and its implications for data fetching.
  • Feat/fe/infrastructure details connect to be #1172: The integration of the authToken for fetching data in the InfrastructureDetails component is relevant to the changes in the main PR that involve the dateRange and data fetching logic, as both are part of enhancing the component's functionality.

Suggested reviewers

  • jennifer-gan
  • marcelluscaio

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a84916f and 69281eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (2 hunks)
  • Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js (1 hunks)
  • Server/validation/joi.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (1)

192-196: Heads up! These params might make your knees weak and arms heavy!

Setting both limit and numToDisplay to null could result in fetching an unnecessarily large dataset, especially with dateRange: "all". Consider:

  1. Implementing pagination or virtual scrolling for large datasets
  2. Adding error handling for timeout/memory issues
  3. Validating response data structure

Let's check the API implementation to understand the impact:

Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js (1)

201-209: Consider performance implications and add validation

The addition of the 'all' option using epoch time could impact performance when querying large datasets. Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add validation for invalid date ranges
  2. Consider implementing pagination or chunking for large date ranges
  3. Add caching mechanism for frequently accessed date ranges

Here's a suggested improvement:

 const getDateRange = (dateRange) => {
+    if (!Object.keys(startDates).includes(dateRange)) {
+        throw new Error(`Invalid date range: ${dateRange}`);
+    }
     const startDates = {
         day: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 1)),
         week: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 7)),
         month: new Date(new Date().setMonth(new Date().getMonth() - 1)),
         all: new Date(0),
     };
+    // Consider caching for large date ranges
+    const key = `date_range_${dateRange}`;
+    const cached = cache.get(key);
+    if (cached) return cached;
+
     return {
         start: startDates[dateRange],
         end: new Date(),
     };
 };

Let's verify the usage of this function across the codebase:

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ const InfrastructureDetails = () => {
];
const [monitor, setMonitor] = useState(null);
const { authToken } = useSelector((state) => state.auth);
const [dateRange, setDateRange] = useState("day");
const [dateRange, setDateRange] = useState("all");
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Yo dawg, your useEffect's dependency array is emptier than mom's spaghetti!

The dateRange state is initialized but changes to it won't trigger a data refetch because it's not included in the useEffect's dependency array.

Add dateRange to the dependency array:

-	}, []);
+	}, [dateRange, authToken, monitorId]);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ const getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation = joi.object({
status: joi.string(),
limit: joi.number(),
sortOrder: joi.string().valid("asc", "desc"),
dateRange: joi.string().valid("day", "week", "month"),
dateRange: joi.string().valid("day", "week", "month", "all"),
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Yo, we got a schema mismatch that's heavier than mom's spaghetti! 🍝

The verification confirms inconsistency in dateRange validation across different endpoints:

  • getMonitorStatsById: Accepts "day", "week", "month", "all"
  • getChecks and getTeamChecks: Only accept "day", "week", "month"

These endpoints are actively used in their respective controllers and the validation mismatch could cause confusion. Either:

  1. Update all schemas to include "all" for consistency
  2. Or document why getMonitorStatsById is special and needs the extra option

• Server/validation/joi.js: Update getChecksQueryValidation and getTeamChecksQueryValidation schemas
• Server/controllers/checkController.js: Both getChecks and getTeamChecks endpoints will be affected

🔗 Analysis chain

Yo dawg, the change looks good but we got some consistency issues! 🍝

The addition of "all" as a valid dateRange option aligns with the PR objectives. However, other validation schemas that use dateRange haven't been updated to include this option.

Let's check for potential impacts:

Consider updating these schemas for consistency:

  • getChecksQueryValidation
  • getTeamChecksQueryValidation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all validation schemas using dateRange to ensure consistency

# Search for validation schemas with dateRange
echo "Searching for validation schemas with dateRange..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 'dateRange:\s*joi\.string\(\)\.valid\('

# Search for usages of these validation schemas
echo "Searching for API endpoints using these schemas..."
rg -l 'getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation|getChecksQueryValidation|getTeamChecksQueryValidation'

Length of output: 1758


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these validation schemas are actually used in the controllers
echo "Checking monitor controller usage..."
rg -B 3 -A 3 'getMonitorStatsByIdQueryValidation' Server/controllers/monitorController.js

echo "\nChecking check controller usage..."
rg -B 3 -A 3 'getChecksQueryValidation|getTeamChecksQueryValidation' Server/controllers/checkController.js

Length of output: 1689

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: This PR introduces an "all" parameter to the getMonitorStatsById function to return all checks. It also updates the network request on the details page to use the correct query parameters. This enhances the capability to retrieve comprehensive monitor data, providing users with more detailed insights.
  • Key components modified:
    • Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js
    • Server/validation/joi.js
    • Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
  • Impact assessment: The changes affect both the server-side logic for handling date ranges and the client-side network request to fetch monitor statistics.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: Changes in the server-side logic and validation schema ensure data integrity and proper handling of the new parameter.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: Addition of a new date range parameter ("all") impacts how data is queried and fetched.
  • Component interactions: The client-side network request now includes the new parameter, ensuring proper data retrieval.
  • Integration points: Changes in the server-side logic and validation schema ensure data integrity and proper handling of the new parameter.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

[File Path] - Server/db/mongo/modules/monitorModule.js

  • Submitted PR Code:

    const getDateRange = (dateRange) => {
      const startDates = {
        day: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 1)),
        week: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 7)),
        month: new Date(new Date().setMonth(new Date().getMonth() - 1)),
        all: new Date(0),
      };
      return {
        start: startDates[dateRange],
        end: new Date(),
      };
    };
  • Analysis:

    • Current logic and potential issues:
      • The addition of the "all" parameter correctly sets the start date to the epoch (new Date(0)), ensuring all checks are included.
      • Potential issues include handling extremely large datasets and invalid dateRange values.
    • Edge cases and error handling:
      • The function should handle cases where dateRange is not one of the predefined values.
    • **Cross-component impact **:
      • This change impacts how data is queried and sent to the client.
    • **Business logic considerations **:
      • Ensures comprehensive data retrieval for detailed monitoring.
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:

    const getDateRange = (dateRange) => {
      const startDates = {
        day: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 1)),
        week: new Date(new Date().setDate(new Date().getDate() - 7)),
        month: new Date(new Date().setMonth(new Date().getMonth() - 1)),
        all: new Date(0),
      };
      if (!startDates[dateRange]) {
        throw new Error(`Invalid dateRange: ${dateRange}`);
      }
      return {
        start: startDates[dateRange],
        end: new Date(),
      };
    };
    • **Improvement rationale **:
      • Technical benefits:
        • Ensures robust error handling for invalid dateRange values.
      • Business value:
        • Prevents incorrect data retrieval and potential system errors.
      • Risk assessment:
        • Minimal risk as it adds error handling without altering core logic.

[File Path] - Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx

  • Submitted PR Code:

    const [dateRange, setDateRange] = useState("all");
    const fetchData = async () => {
      try {
        const response = await networkService.getStatsByMonitorId({
          authToken: authToken,
          monitorId: monitorId,
          sortOrder: "asc",
          limit: null,
          dateRange: dateRange,
          numToDisplay: null,
          normalize: false,
        });
        setMonitor(response.data.data);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(error);
      }
    };
  • Analysis:

    • Current logic and potential issues:
      • The dateRange is now set to "all" by default, aligning with the new server-side logic.
      • The fetchData function correctly includes the new parameters.
    • Edge cases and error handling:
      • Error handling is present but could be enhanced with user notifications.
    • **Cross-component impact **:
      • This change ensures the client correctly requests all data from the server.
    • **Business logic considerations **:
      • Ensures comprehensive data display for users.
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:

    const fetchData = async () => {
      try {
        const response = await networkService.getStatsByMonitorId({
          authToken: authToken,
          monitorId: monitorId,
          sortOrder: "asc",
          limit: null,
          dateRange: dateRange,
          numToDisplay: null,
          normalize: false,
        });
        setMonitor(response.data.data);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(error);
        notifyUser("Error fetching data. Please try again later.");
      }
    };
    • **Improvement rationale **:
      • Technical benefits:
        • Enhances user experience by providing feedback on errors.
      • Business value:
        • Improves user satisfaction and trust in the system.
      • Risk assessment:
        • Minimal risk as it adds user notifications without altering core logic.

Cross-cutting Concerns

  • Data flow analysis:
    • Data flow is correctly handled from server to client.
  • State management implications:
    • The new parameter and validation logic can be reused in other parts of the system.
  • Error propagation paths:
    • Basic error handling is present but can be improved.
  • Edge case handling across components:
    • Limited handling of invalid dateRange values.

Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis

  • Complexity analysis:
    • Querying all data may impact performance for large datasets.
  • Performance implications:
    • The system should be tested for scalability under heavy data loads.
  • Memory usage considerations:
    • Potential memory usage issues should be considered for large datasets.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure:
    • The changes are well-organized and modular, affecting only the relevant files.
  • Design patterns usage:
    • The changes adhere to existing design patterns and conventions.
  • Error handling approach:
    • Basic error handling is present but can be improved with comprehensive user notifications.
  • Resource management:
    • The code is easy to read and understand, with clear separation of concerns.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • Critical Issues:

    • Issue: Lack of comprehensive error handling in fetchData.
    • Impact:
      • Technical implications:
        • Potential for unhandled errors leading to system instability.
      • Business consequences:
        • Negative user experience due to lack of feedback on errors.
      • User experience effects:
        • Users may be unaware of data fetching failures.
    • Recommendation:
      • Specific code changes:
        • Add user notifications for fetch errors.
      • Configuration updates:
        • None required.
      • Testing requirements:
        • Test error scenarios to ensure proper user notifications.
  • Warnings:

    • Issue: Potential performance impact of querying all data.
    • Potential risks:
      • Performance implications:
        • Large datasets may cause performance degradation.
      • Maintenance overhead:
        • Increased complexity in handling large data volumes.
      • Future scalability:
        • Potential bottlenecks as the system scales.
    • Suggested improvements:
      • Implementation approach:
        • Implement pagination or lazy loading for large datasets.
      • Migration strategy:
        • Gradually introduce pagination based on data volume.
      • Testing considerations:
        • Test with large datasets to ensure performance and usability.

4. Security Assessment

4.1 Security Considerations

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts:
    • No immediate security concerns identified.
  • Data handling concerns:
    • Data flow is correctly handled from server to client.
  • Input validation:
    • Validation is in place to handle the new parameter.
  • Security best practices:
    • The changes adhere to existing security best practices.

4.2 Vulnerability Analysis

  • Potential security risks:
    • None identified.
  • Mitigation strategies:
    • Continue adhering to security best practices.
  • Security testing requirements:
    • Ensure comprehensive security testing during CI/CD.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis:
    • Test the getDateRange function for valid and invalid inputs.
    • Test the fetchData function for different scenarios, including errors.
  • Integration test scenarios:
    • Test the integration between client and server with the new parameter.
  • Edge cases coverage:
    • Validate edge cases such as large datasets and invalid inputs.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

// Unit test for getDateRange
describe('getDateRange', () => {
  it('should return correct start date for "all"', () => {
    const { start, end } = getDateRange('all');
    expect(start.getTime()).toBe(0);
    expect(end).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
  });

  it('should throw an error for invalid dateRange', () => {
    expect(() => getDateRange('invalid')).toThrow('Invalid dateRange: invalid');
  });
});

// Integration test for fetchData
describe('fetchData', () => {
  it('should fetch data successfully', async () => {
    // Mock networkService.getStatsByMonitorId to return a successful response
    const mockResponse = { data: { data: 'mockData' } };
    networkService.getStatsByMonitorId = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockResponse);

    await fetchData();
    expect(setMonitor).toHaveBeenCalledWith('mockData');
  });

  it('should notify user on fetch error', async () => {
    // Mock networkService.getStatsByMonitorId to throw an error
    networkService.getStatsByMonitorId = jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Fetch error'));

    await fetchData();
    expect(notifyUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Error fetching data. Please try again later.');
  });
});
  • Coverage improvements:
    • Ensure comprehensive test coverage for new changes.
  • Performance testing needs:
    • Benchmark performance with large datasets to identify bottlenecks.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed:
    • Update documentation to reflect the new parameter and usage.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations:
    • Consider maintenance implications of handling large datasets.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
    • Enhance logging and monitoring for better debugging and traceability.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy:
    • Ensure the deployment process includes the new parameter and validation logic.
  • Key operational considerations:
    • Plan for rollback in case of issues with the new parameter.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required:

    • Add comprehensive error handling and user notifications in fetchData.
  2. Important improvements suggested:

    • Implement pagination or lazy loading for large datasets to improve performance.
  3. Best practices to implement:

    • Enhance logging and monitoring for better debugging and traceability.
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address:

    • Ensure robust error handling for invalid dateRange values.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path:
    • Gradually introduce pagination based on data volume.
  • Business capability evolution:
    • Enhance user insights by providing comprehensive monitor data.
  • System integration impacts:
    • Ensure proper integration between client and server with the new parameter.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Utils/Logger.js (3)

Line range hint 2-2: Yo! Consider environment-specific default log levels

Having "debug" as the default log level might spill too much tea in production environments. Consider setting different defaults based on the environment.

-const LOG_LEVEL = import.meta.env.VITE_APP_LOG_LEVEL || "debug";
+const LOG_LEVEL = import.meta.env.VITE_APP_LOG_LEVEL || (import.meta.env.PROD ? "error" : "debug");

47-54: The debug level implementation looks clean, but let's validate those levels!

The new debug level is implemented well, but we should add validation for log levels coming from the Redux store to prevent any funky business.

 updateLogLevel(logLevel) {
+  const VALID_LEVELS = ["none", "error", "warn", "info", "debug"];
+  if (!VALID_LEVELS.includes(logLevel)) {
+    console.warn(`Invalid log level "${logLevel}". Defaulting to "error"`);
+    logLevel = "error";
+  }
+
   if (logLevel === "none") {

Yo, there's no cleanup call in sight - that's a real memory leak delight!

The Logger instance is created as a singleton and imported across multiple components, but there's no cleanup happening anywhere. The cleanup() method exists but isn't being called, which means the Redux store subscription (this.unsubscribe) is never properly cleaned up.

  • Client/src/Utils/Logger.js: The singleton logger is created and exported but never cleaned up
  • Multiple components import and use the logger but none implement cleanup
  • The Redux subscription will persist even when components unmount

To fix this spaghetti situation:

  1. Consider moving the logger to a React context provider
  2. Implement cleanup in the provider's cleanup phase
  3. Or refactor to avoid subscriptions altogether and use Redux selectors instead
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 56-60: Mom's spaghetti warning: Potential memory leak!

The cleanup method is solid, but there's no guarantee it's being called. Consider using a WeakRef or implementing automatic cleanup in modern frameworks.

Let's check if cleanup is properly called:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Logger instantiation and cleanup patterns
echo "Searching for Logger usage patterns..."
rg -A 5 "new Logger\(\)" 
rg "cleanup.*Logger"

Length of output: 1208


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check where Logger is used and if cleanup is called in component unmounting or disposal
echo "Searching for Logger imports and cleanup patterns..."
rg -B 2 -A 5 "import.*Logger" 
rg -B 2 -A 5 "useEffect.*cleanup" 
rg -B 2 -A 5 "componentWillUnmount.*cleanup"

# Let's also check the Logger class implementation
echo "Checking Logger implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class Logger {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 23343

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69281eb and 6dab90f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (3 hunks)
  • Client/src/Utils/Logger.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit 2602148 into develop Nov 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@ajhollid ajhollid deleted the feat/infras-monitor-details-request branch November 25, 2024 02:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant