fix: Infrastructure page content width #1249
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx (3)
Line range hint
89-102: Enhance error handling in fetchMonitorsThe current error handling only logs to console, which doesn't provide feedback to users when monitoring data fails to load.
Consider implementing error state and user notification:
const [monitorState, setMonitorState] = useState({ monitors: [], total: 0 }); +const [error, setError] = useState(null); const fetchMonitors = async () => { + setError(null); try { const response = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({ // ... existing config }); setMonitorState({ monitors: response?.data?.data?.monitors ?? [], total: response?.data?.data?.monitorCount ?? 0, }); } catch (error) { console.error(error); + setError('Failed to fetch infrastructure monitors'); + // Consider using your notification system here } };
Line range hint
31-57: Prioritize the reusable table component implementationThe TODO comment outlines a solid architecture for a reusable table component. This would improve maintainability and reduce duplication across the application.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of this reusable table component? I can provide a detailed specification based on the TODO comment.
Line range hint
124-165: Optimize monitorsAsRows calculation performanceThe monitorsAsRows mapping performs multiple calculations that could be memoized to prevent unnecessary recalculations on re-renders.
Consider using useMemo:
+import { useMemo } from 'react'; -const monitorsAsRows = monitors.map((monitor) => { +const monitorsAsRows = useMemo(() => monitors.map((monitor) => { // ... existing mapping logic -}); +}), [monitors, theme.palette.percentage]);
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR addresses the issue of inconsistent content width on the Infrastructure Page, ensuring a consistent user experience across different pages.
- Key components modified: The
Infrastructurecomponent inClient/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx. - Impact assessment: The change primarily affects the layout and styling of the Infrastructure Page, improving the overall usability and visual consistency of the application.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: No new dependencies are introduced; the change leverages existing components and styling functions.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The change involves updating the
Stackcomponent's properties to use a dynamicgapbased on the theme's spacing function instead of a fixed value. - Component interactions: The modification affects the layout and styling of the Infrastructure Page, ensuring that the content width is consistent with other pages.
- Integration points: The change does not impact integration points but ensures that the UI components are rendered consistently.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx - Infrastructure Component
- Submitted PR Code:
--- +++ @@ -159,24 +159,21 @@ cpu, mem, disk, status, uptimePercentage, percentageColor, }; }); return ( - <Stack - component="main" - style={{ width: "100%", gap: "1rem" }} - > + <Stack gap={theme.spacing(8)}> <Breadcrumbs list={BREADCRUMBS} /> <Stack direction="row" sx={{ justifyContent: "end", alignItems: "center", gap: "1rem", flexWrap: "wrap", marginBottom: "2rem", }}
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The current logic uses a fixed width and gap for the
Stackcomponent, which can lead to inconsistencies in the layout compared to other pages. However, the change to usetheme.spacing(8)for the gap introduces a potential issue with responsiveness. Thetheme.spacing(8)might not be flexible enough for different screen sizes, leading to layout issues on smaller screens. - Edge cases and error handling: The change does not introduce new edge cases or error handling scenarios, but it does affect the responsiveness of the layout.
- Cross-component impact: The change ensures that the Infrastructure Page's layout is consistent with other pages, improving the overall user experience. However, the use of a fixed spacing value might not be ideal for all screen sizes.
- Business logic considerations: The change aligns with the business requirement of maintaining a consistent UI across different pages, but it might not fully address the responsiveness needs.
- Current logic and potential issues: The current logic uses a fixed width and gap for the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<Stack gap={theme.spacing(isMobile ? 4 : 8)}>
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Using a conditional spacing value based on the screen size ensures that the layout is responsive and consistent across different devices.
- Business value: Improves the user experience by ensuring that the layout is optimized for different screen sizes, enhancing usability.
- Risk assessment: Low risk as the change is isolated to the layout and styling of a single component and improves responsiveness.
- Analysis:
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx - fetchMonitors Function
- Submitted PR Code:
const fetchMonitors = async () => { try { const response = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({ // ... existing config }); setMonitorState({ monitors: response?.data?.data?.monitors ?? [], total: response?.data?.data?.monitorCount ?? 0, }); } catch (error) { console.error(error); } };
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The current error handling only logs to the console, which doesn't provide feedback to users when monitoring data fails to load. Additionally, the function does not handle scenarios where the network request is canceled or times out.
- Edge cases and error handling: The function should handle network request cancellations and timeouts to provide a more robust error handling mechanism.
- Cross-component impact: Improving error handling in
fetchMonitorswill enhance the user experience by providing better feedback and ensuring that the application can handle network-related issues gracefully. - Business logic considerations: Enhancing error handling aligns with the business requirement of providing a reliable and user-friendly monitoring tool.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const fetchMonitors = async () => { const controller = new AbortController(); const signal = controller.signal; setError(null); try { const response = await networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId({ signal, // ... existing config }); setMonitorState({ monitors: response?.data?.data?.monitors ?? [], total: response?.data?.data?.monitorCount ?? 0, }); } catch (error) { if (error.name === 'AbortError') { console.log('Fetch aborted'); } else { console.error(error); setError('Failed to fetch infrastructure monitors'); // Consider using your notification system here } } return () => controller.abort(); };
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Using
AbortControllerallows the function to handle request cancellations, improving the robustness of the error handling mechanism. - Business value: Enhances the user experience by providing better feedback and ensuring that the application can handle network-related issues gracefully.
- Risk assessment: Low risk as the change improves error handling and does not introduce new dependencies or complex logic.
- Technical benefits: Using
- Analysis:
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure:
- Organization and modularity: The change is well-organized and modular, affecting only the specific component responsible for the Infrastructure Page layout.
- Design patterns usage: The change adheres to the design patterns used in the application, leveraging existing components and styling functions.
- Error handling approach: The change does not introduce new error handling scenarios but improves the existing error handling in the
fetchMonitorsfunction. - Resource management: The change does not impact resource management.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues:
- Issue description: No critical issues identified.
- Impact: N/A
- Recommendation: N/A
-
🟡 Warnings:
- Warning description: The use of a fixed spacing value (
theme.spacing(8)) might not be ideal for all screen sizes, potentially affecting responsiveness. - Potential risks: The layout might not be optimal on smaller screens, affecting the user experience.
- Suggested improvements: Use a conditional spacing value based on the screen size to ensure responsiveness.
- Warning description: The use of a fixed spacing value (
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The change is straightforward and easy to maintain, as it involves updating the properties of an existing component.
- Readability issues: No readability issues identified.
- Performance bottlenecks: No performance bottlenecks identified.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: No impacts.
- Data handling concerns: No concerns.
- Input validation: No changes impacting input validation.
- Security best practices: The change adheres to security best practices.
- Potential security risks: No potential security risks identified.
- Mitigation strategies: N/A
- Security testing requirements: Ensure that the error handling in
fetchMonitorsis tested to verify that it handles network request cancellations and timeouts correctly.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Ensure that the
Stackcomponent's properties are tested to verify that the dynamicgapis applied correctly. - Integration test requirements: Verify that the Infrastructure Page's layout is consistent with other pages.
- Edge cases coverage: No new edge cases introduced.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Unit test for dynamic gap in Stack component
test('Stack component should apply dynamic gap based on theme spacing', () => {
const theme = { spacing: (value) => value * 8 };
const wrapper = shallow(<Stack gap={theme.spacing(8)} />);
expect(wrapper.props().gap).toBe(64);
});
// Integration test for layout consistency
test('Infrastructure Page layout should be consistent with other pages', () => {
const wrapper = mount(<InfrastructurePage />);
expect(wrapper.find(Stack).props().gap).toBe(theme.spacing(8));
});
// Unit test for error handling in fetchMonitors
test('fetchMonitors should handle network request cancellations', async () => {
const controller = new AbortController();
const signal = controller.signal;
networkService.getMonitorsByTeamId = jest.fn(() => {
throw new DOMException('Aborted', 'AbortError');
});
await fetchMonitors(signal);
expect(setError).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});- Coverage improvements: Ensure that the error handling in
fetchMonitorsis tested to verify that it handles network request cancellations and timeouts correctly. - Performance testing needs: No performance testing needs identified.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation to reflect the changes in the
Stackcomponent's properties and the improved error handling infetchMonitors. - Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the dynamic spacing value is maintained and updated as needed to support responsiveness.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: No technical debt or monitoring requirements identified.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The change does not impact the deployment strategy.
- Key operational considerations: Ensure that the layout and error handling changes are tested in the staging environment before deployment to production.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- None identified.
-
Important improvements suggested:
- Implement error state and user notification in
fetchMonitors.
- Implement error state and user notification in
-
Best practices to implement:
- Use a conditional spacing value based on the screen size to ensure responsiveness.
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Ensure that the layout is consistent across different screen sizes.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Continuously improve the responsiveness and error handling of the application to enhance the user experience.
- Business capability evolution: Ensure that the application provides a consistent and user-friendly monitoring tool.
- System integration impacts: No system integration impacts identified.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
|
Looks good @peterpardo - that now has exactly the same width as other menu items, right ? |
Yep! Here is a quick demo: Recording.2024-12-03.020752.mp4 |
|
Looks good. If you want other quick UI fixes/tasks, I can suggest a few of those. |
marcelluscaio
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
ajhollid
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Yeah sure! I'll be happy to help. |
This was referenced Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR fixes the issue of the page content width of the Infrastructure Page, the route is
/infrastructure, wherein its page content width is wider than the other pages; resulting also in making the sidebar width smaller.Changes Made
divelement instead of themainelement as the main container for the page contentRelated Issues/s
Closes #1241
Screenshots
Before:
After:
Additional Context
N/A