Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Adjust Search Bar height #1341

Merged

Conversation

peterpardo
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR fixes the issue for the search bar height

Changes Made

  • Updated the padding of the Search component

Related Issue/s

Fixes #1322

Screenshots / Demo Video

Before:
image

After:
image

Additional Context

N/A

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Search component in Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx. A new prop, inputValue, is added to enhance input state management. The Autocomplete component now uses this prop to control the displayed value, and the onInputChange handler is updated accordingly. Additionally, styling adjustments are made to the input field's vertical padding. The core functionalities, including option filtering and rendering, remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx - Added inputValue prop to Search component.
- Updated onInputChange to use handleInputChange.
- Modified vertical padding for MuiOutlinedInput-root.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Height of the search bar should be 34px (same as other line edit inputs in our Components) (#1322) The height requirement of the search bar is not addressed in the changes.

Suggested reviewers

  • ajhollid

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx (1)

Line range hint 176-188: Mom's spaghetti alert! 🍝 Breaking changes detected!

Making inputValue and handleInputChange required props (isRequired) is a breaking change that will affect all existing Search component usage. This wasn't part of the height fix objective and could cause unexpected issues.

Consider making these props optional or handle this in a separate PR:

- inputValue: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
- handleInputChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
+ inputValue: PropTypes.string,
+ handleInputChange: PropTypes.func,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 151500d and f26c0a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx (2)

Line range hint 171-175: Yo, what's up with this commented height? 👀

There's a commented out height: 34 in the sx prop. We should verify if there are any conflicting styles from MUI that might affect our height implementation.

Let's check for any other height-related styles:

✅ Verification successful

Yo, that commented height is safe to remove! 🔥

The component already has proper height control through:

  • Custom padding with paddingY: 0 on the OutlinedInput
  • SVG icon dimensions set to 16px
  • MUI's default styles handling the rest

The commented height would actually conflict with MUI's responsive sizing, so it's better off staying commented out or being removed entirely.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for height-related styles in MUI components
rg -A 5 "MuiAutocomplete.*height" --type jsx
rg -A 5 "MuiOutlinedInput.*height" --type jsx

Length of output: 150


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching without file type restriction and include js/jsx files
rg -A 5 "MuiAutocomplete.*height" 
rg -A 5 "MuiOutlinedInput.*height"

# Also search for any height-related styles in the Search component
rg -A 5 "height" "Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx"

# Let's also check for any custom theme overrides
rg -A 5 "MuiAutocomplete" "Client/src/theme"
rg -A 5 "MuiOutlinedInput" "Client/src/theme"

Length of output: 621


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the theme configuration in different possible locations
fd -e js -e jsx theme
fd -e js -e jsx styles

# Let's also check for any MUI style customizations in the entire codebase
rg -A 5 "createTheme|ThemeProvider" 

# And check the actual Search component implementation
cat "Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx"

Length of output: 7313


Line range hint 40-54: Hold up, what's with all these extra props? 🤔

The PR objective was to fix the search bar height, but I notice you've added new props (inputValue, handleInputChange, secondaryLabel). While these might be valid improvements, they seem outside the scope of the height fix.

Let's check if these changes are being used elsewhere:

Comment on lines +96 to +98
"& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": {
paddingY: 0,
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Yo dawg, we need to fix that height properly! 🍝

The current changes only set paddingY: 0 but don't explicitly set the height to 34px as required in issue #1322. This might not consistently achieve the desired height across different browsers and scenarios.

Let's fix this with proper height setting:

 "& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": {
-  paddingY: 0,
+  height: '34px',
+  '& input': {
+    height: '34px',
+    padding: '0 14px',
+  }
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": {
paddingY: 0,
},
"& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": {
height: '34px',
'& input': {
height: '34px',
padding: '0 14px',
}
},

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: This PR fixes the height of the search bar to match other input fields in the system, improving visual consistency and user experience.
  • Key components modified: SearchBar component in Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx
  • Impact assessment: Low impact as the change is limited to the search bar's height. However, it could have layout implications for components that rely on the search bar's height.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: Components that use the search bar, especially those that rely on its height for layout or positioning, may be affected.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: N/A for this PR.
  • Component interactions: The search bar is used across multiple components. Changes to its height could affect these components' layout or positioning.
  • Integration points: N/A for this PR.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

  • Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.jsx - SearchBar

    • Submitted PR Code:
      "& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": {
        paddingY: 0,
      },
    • Analysis:
      • The current logic removes the vertical padding of the search bar, setting it to 0. However, this might not align with the desired height of 34px as mentioned in the related issue.
      • Edge cases and error handling are not applicable to this specific change.
      • Cross-component impact: As mentioned in the overview, this change could impact components that rely on the search bar's height for layout or positioning.
      • Business logic considerations are not applicable to this PR.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
      "& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": {
        height: '34px',
        paddingY: '8px', // Add padding to match the height
      },
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits: Ensures the search bar's height matches the desired 34px, making it consistent with other input fields in the system.
      • Business value: Improves user experience by maintaining visual consistency across input fields.
      • Risk assessment: Low risk as it only affects the search bar's height and doesn't introduce new functionality or data handling.
  • Client/src/Components/Inputs/Search/index.test.jsx - SearchBar tests

    • Submitted PR Code: N/A (No changes submitted in the PR)
    • Analysis:
      • The current tests for the search bar component do not account for the new height.
      • Edge cases and error handling are not applicable to this specific change.
      • Cross-component impact and business logic considerations are not applicable to this PR.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
      it('renders with the correct height', () => {
        const { getByRole } = render(<SearchBar />);
        const searchInput = getByRole('textbox');
        expect(searchInput).toHaveStyle('height: 34px');
      });
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits: Ensures the search bar's height is tested and functions as expected.
      • Business value: Improves confidence in the search bar's functionality and consistency.
      • Risk assessment: Low risk as it only adds a test for the search bar's height and doesn't introduce new functionality or data handling.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure: The code is well-organized and follows a clear structure. However, the test file could benefit from the suggested test case to ensure the search bar's height is tested.
  • Design patterns usage: N/A for this PR.
  • Error handling approach: N/A for this PR.
  • Resource management: N/A for this PR.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues

    • Issue: The current change only removes the vertical padding of the search bar, setting it to 0. This might not align with the desired height of 34px as mentioned in the related issue.
    • Impact: The search bar's height might not match the desired height, leading to visual inconsistencies with other input fields.
    • Recommendation: Update the search bar's height to 34px and add padding to match this height.
  • 🟡 Warnings

    • Warning: The search bar's height change could impact components that rely on its height for layout or positioning.
    • Potential risks: Layout disruptions, inconsistent user experience across components.
    • Suggested improvements: Review and update components that use the search bar to ensure they handle the new height correctly.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects: The code is well-maintained and easy to understand. However, the test file could benefit from the suggested test case to ensure the search bar's height is tested.
  • Readability issues: N/A for this PR.
  • Performance bottlenecks: N/A for this PR.

4. Security Assessment

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: N/A for this PR.
  • Data handling concerns: N/A for this PR.
  • Input validation: N/A for this PR.
  • Security best practices: N/A for this PR.
  • Potential security risks: N/A for this PR.
  • Mitigation strategies: N/A for this PR.
  • Security testing requirements: N/A for this PR.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis: The current tests for the search bar component do not account for the new height.
  • Integration test requirements: N/A for this PR.
  • Edge cases coverage: N/A for this PR.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

it('renders with the correct height', () => {
  const { getByRole } = render(<SearchBar />);
  const searchInput = getByRole('textbox');
  expect(searchInput).toHaveStyle('height: 34px');
});
  • Coverage improvements: The suggested test case ensures the search bar's height is tested and functions as expected.
  • Performance testing needs: N/A for this PR.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed: N/A for this PR.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the search bar's height is maintained consistently across updates and new components.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements: N/A for this PR.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy: N/A for this PR.
  • Key operational considerations: N/A for this PR.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Update the search bar's height to 34px and add padding to match this height.
  2. Review and update components that use the search bar to ensure they handle the new height correctly.
  3. Add a test case to ensure the search bar's height is tested and functions as expected.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path: Maintain consistency in input field heights across new components and updates.
  • Business capability evolution: N/A for this PR.
  • System integration impacts: N/A for this PR.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

@gorkem-bwl
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good!

Copy link
Collaborator

@ajhollid ajhollid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting problem, I guess the AutoComplete wrapper overrides some styles of TextInput.

Any event this resolves it, thanks for the contribution!

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit ed075e5 into bluewave-labs:develop Dec 11, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Height of the search bar should be 34px (same as other line edit inputs in our Components)
3 participants