Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: row background color on hover #1458

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024
Merged

fix: row background color on hover #1458

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

marcelluscaio
Copy link
Contributor

@marcelluscaio marcelluscaio commented Dec 23, 2024

I decided to move away from changing background color and try a filter approach, that is applied to the whole row, which will help keep consistency (everything changes at once)

Solves: #1323

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: The PR fixes an issue (Change background color of hovered rows #1323) related to the visual appearance of the BasicTable component when a row is hovered over. It aims to improve the user experience by maintaining consistency in the styling of the entire row.
  • Key components modified: BasicTable component in Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx and its usage in Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx.
  • Impact assessment: The changes affect the visual appearance of the BasicTable component, which is used across multiple pages. This could have a system-wide visual impact.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes might interact with other styling or accessibility features due to the use of a filter approach for hover effects.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

  • Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx
    • Submitted PR Code:
      <TableRow
        sx={{
          cursor: row.handleClick ? "pointer" : "default",
          "&:hover": {
            filter: "brightness(.75)",
            opacity: 0.75,
            transition: "filter 0.3s ease, opacity 0.3s ease",
          },
        }}
        key={row.id}
        onClick={row.handleClick ? row.handleClick : null}
      >
    • Analysis:
      • The current logic changes the background color of the row on hover using a filter approach. This is a good approach for consistency, as it changes the whole row at once.
      • However, the use of filter and opacity might cause performance issues, especially on large tables, as it requires recalculating the layout and style of the elements.
      • The change might also affect accessibility, as filters can sometimes be less accessible than simple color changes.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
      <TableRow
        sx={{
          cursor: row.handleClick ? "pointer" : "default",
          "&:hover": {
            backgroundColor: (theme) => theme.palette.action.hover,
            transition: "background-color 0.3s ease",
          },
        }}
        key={row.id}
        onClick={row.handleClick ? row.handleClick : null}
      >
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Using backgroundColor instead of filter and opacity can improve performance, as it only requires recalculating the color of the element, not the layout and style.
      • This approach is also more accessible, as it uses a simple color change, which is generally more accessible than filters.
      • The action.hover color is a standard Material-UI color that is used for hover effects, ensuring consistency with the rest of the UI.
      • The transition is kept to ensure a smooth user experience.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure: The changes are well-structured and follow the existing code structure, making them easy to understand and maintain.
  • Design patterns usage: The use of Material-UI's TableRow component and sx prop for styling is consistent with the rest of the application.
  • Error handling approach: Not applicable in this context.
  • Resource management: Not applicable in this context.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues

    • Issue: The use of filter and opacity for hover effects might cause performance issues, especially on large tables.
    • Impact: This could lead to a poor user experience with lagging or unresponsive tables.
    • Recommendation: Implement the suggested improvement using backgroundColor instead of filter and opacity to mitigate this issue.
  • 🟡 Warnings

    • Warning: The change might affect the accessibility of the tables, as filters can sometimes be less accessible than simple color changes.
    • Potential risks: This could lead to a poor user experience for users relying on assistive technologies.
    • Suggested improvements: Implement the suggested improvement using backgroundColor instead of filter and opacity to mitigate this issue. Additionally, thoroughly test the tables with assistive technologies to ensure accessibility.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects: The changes are well-structured and easy to understand, making them easy to maintain.
  • Readability issues: Not applicable in this context.
  • Performance bottlenecks: The use of filter and opacity for hover effects might cause performance issues, as discussed in the potential issues section.

4. Security Assessment

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: Not applicable in this context.
  • Data handling concerns: Not applicable in this context.
  • Input validation: Not applicable in this context.
  • Security best practices: Not applicable in this context.
  • Potential security risks: Not identified in this context.
  • Mitigation strategies: Not applicable in this context.
  • Security testing requirements: Not applicable in this context.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis: Not applicable in this context.
  • Integration test requirements: Ensure that the BasicTable component behaves as expected when used in different contexts (e.g., UptimeTable and potentially others).
  • Edge cases coverage: Test the component with large datasets to ensure performance is not negatively impacted.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

// Example test case using Jest and React Testing Library
it('should change background color on hover using filter approach', () => {
  const { getByTestId } = render(<BasicTable data={[]} />);
  const row = getByTestId('row-0');
  fireEvent.mouseOver(row);
  expect(row).toHaveStyle('filter: brightness(.75)');
  expect(row).toHaveStyle('opacity: 0.75');
});
  • Coverage improvements: Ensure that the test suite covers the performance, consistency, and accessibility aspects of the change.
  • Performance testing needs: Include performance tests to ensure that the tables remain responsive even with large datasets.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation for the BasicTable component to reflect the changes in hover behavior.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the BasicTable component is maintained and updated in line with the rest of the application.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Not applicable in this context.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy: The changes should be deployed as part of the regular deployment process for the application.
  • Key operational considerations: Monitor the performance of the tables after deployment to ensure that the changes have not introduced any significant performance issues.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required: Implement the suggested improvement using backgroundColor instead of filter and opacity to mitigate performance and accessibility issues.
  2. Important improvements suggested: Thoroughly test the tables with assistive technologies to ensure accessibility.
  3. Best practices to implement: Use backgroundColor for hover effects to improve performance and accessibility.
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address: Ensure that the BasicTable component behaves as expected when used in different contexts. Monitor the performance of the tables after deployment.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path: As the application evolves, ensure that the BasicTable component is maintained and updated in line with the rest of the application.
  • Business capability evolution: As the application's business capabilities evolve, ensure that the BasicTable component is adapted to meet the changing needs of the business.
  • System integration impacts: As the application is integrated with other systems, ensure that the BasicTable component is adapted to meet the needs of those integrations.

💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces subtle refinements to two React components: BasicTable and MonitorTable. The primary modifications focus on enhancing the user interface's hover interactions by replacing traditional background color changes with more nuanced filter and opacity effects. Additionally, a minor prop type correction was made, renaming rowPerPage to rowsPerPage to ensure consistent naming conventions.

Changes

File Change Summary
Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx - Corrected prop type from rowPerPage to rowsPerPage
- Updated hover effect with filter and opacity styles
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx - Added TODO comment for potential future enhancement
- Modified table row hover effect with filter and opacity
- Updated fetchPage function with filter: null parameter

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant UI as User Interface
    participant Table as Table Component
    participant Data as Data Source

    UI->>Table: Hover over row
    Table->>Table: Apply hover effect
    Table->>Data: Potentially trigger data fetch
    Data-->>Table: Return data (if applicable)
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the basic interaction during a table row hover, highlighting the potential for data interactions and the visual hover effect applied by the modified components.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx (1)

Line range hint 319-319: Yo, we got a prop type mismatch! Fix it before your palms get sweaty!

The prop type declaration uses rowPerPage but the component uses rowsPerPage. Let's fix this to maintain type safety.

Apply this diff to fix the prop type:

BasicTable.propTypes = {
  data: PropTypes.object.isRequired,
  paginated: PropTypes.bool,
  reversed: PropTypes.bool,
- rowPerPage: PropTypes.number,
+ rowsPerPage: PropTypes.number,
  table: PropTypes.string,
  emptyMessage: PropTypes.string,
};
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx (1)

147-147: Yo! Let's address this TODO comment, dawg!

Consider implementing the BasicTable component here to improve code reusability and maintain consistent table behavior across the application.

Want me to help sketch out how we could refactor this to use the BasicTable component? Just say the word!

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 213c055 and e1ea105.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx (1 hunks)
  • Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx (1)

267-269: Smooth moves with that hover effect! 🎵

The new hover implementation using filter and opacity creates a more consistent visual effect across the entire row. The transition timing is on point!

Though, let's verify this works well with all themes:

✅ Verification successful

Yo, that hover effect is straight fire! 🔥

Looking through the theme configurations and hover implementations across the codebase, the filter and opacity combo works perfectly with all themes! The background transitions in the theme are consistently handled through theme.palette.background values, and this hover effect using filter/opacity is theme-agnostic - it'll work smoothly regardless of the theme's colour palette.

Plus, I spotted similar hover patterns in components like StatusBox and Sidebar that use opacity/filter transitions without any theme conflicts. This implementation is solid!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any theme-specific overrides that might affect the hover
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'palette.*background.*accent|palette.*hover' 

Length of output: 2224


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the theme configuration to understand how hover states are handled
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'createTheme.*background|palette.*background' -A 5 

# Also check for any existing hover effects in the table component
ast-grep --pattern 'hover: {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 30577

Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx (1)

219-221: These hover effects are straight fire! 🔥

The hover implementation perfectly matches the UptimeTable component, maintaining consistency across the application. The transition timing is chef's kiss.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ajhollid ajhollid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any technical issues, @gorkemcetin if you're OK with the styling I'm good on the technical side.

Here are screen captures, first row is hovered in both dark and light mode

image

image

@gorkem-bwl
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see any technical issues, @gorkemcetin if you're OK with the styling I'm good on the technical side.

Here are screen captures, first row is hovered in both dark and light mode

I am fine with that! Thanks @marcelluscaio @ajhollid

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit 8b291ce into develop Dec 23, 2024
3 checks passed
@ajhollid ajhollid deleted the fix/row-hover branch December 23, 2024 06:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants