-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: row background color on hover #1458
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: The PR fixes an issue (Change background color of hovered rows #1323) related to the visual appearance of the
BasicTable
component when a row is hovered over. It aims to improve the user experience by maintaining consistency in the styling of the entire row. - Key components modified:
BasicTable
component inClient/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx
and its usage inClient/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx
. - Impact assessment: The changes affect the visual appearance of the
BasicTable
component, which is used across multiple pages. This could have a system-wide visual impact. - System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes might interact with other styling or accessibility features due to the use of a filter approach for hover effects.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
<TableRow sx={{ cursor: row.handleClick ? "pointer" : "default", "&:hover": { filter: "brightness(.75)", opacity: 0.75, transition: "filter 0.3s ease, opacity 0.3s ease", }, }} key={row.id} onClick={row.handleClick ? row.handleClick : null} >
- Analysis:
- The current logic changes the background color of the row on hover using a filter approach. This is a good approach for consistency, as it changes the whole row at once.
- However, the use of
filter
andopacity
might cause performance issues, especially on large tables, as it requires recalculating the layout and style of the elements. - The change might also affect accessibility, as filters can sometimes be less accessible than simple color changes.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<TableRow sx={{ cursor: row.handleClick ? "pointer" : "default", "&:hover": { backgroundColor: (theme) => theme.palette.action.hover, transition: "background-color 0.3s ease", }, }} key={row.id} onClick={row.handleClick ? row.handleClick : null} >
- Improvement rationale:
- Using
backgroundColor
instead offilter
andopacity
can improve performance, as it only requires recalculating the color of the element, not the layout and style. - This approach is also more accessible, as it uses a simple color change, which is generally more accessible than filters.
- The
action.hover
color is a standard Material-UI color that is used for hover effects, ensuring consistency with the rest of the UI. - The transition is kept to ensure a smooth user experience.
- Using
- Submitted PR Code:
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes are well-structured and follow the existing code structure, making them easy to understand and maintain.
- Design patterns usage: The use of Material-UI's
TableRow
component andsx
prop for styling is consistent with the rest of the application. - Error handling approach: Not applicable in this context.
- Resource management: Not applicable in this context.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue: The use of
filter
andopacity
for hover effects might cause performance issues, especially on large tables. - Impact: This could lead to a poor user experience with lagging or unresponsive tables.
- Recommendation: Implement the suggested improvement using
backgroundColor
instead offilter
andopacity
to mitigate this issue.
- Issue: The use of
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning: The change might affect the accessibility of the tables, as filters can sometimes be less accessible than simple color changes.
- Potential risks: This could lead to a poor user experience for users relying on assistive technologies.
- Suggested improvements: Implement the suggested improvement using
backgroundColor
instead offilter
andopacity
to mitigate this issue. Additionally, thoroughly test the tables with assistive technologies to ensure accessibility.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes are well-structured and easy to understand, making them easy to maintain.
- Readability issues: Not applicable in this context.
- Performance bottlenecks: The use of
filter
andopacity
for hover effects might cause performance issues, as discussed in the potential issues section.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: Not applicable in this context.
- Data handling concerns: Not applicable in this context.
- Input validation: Not applicable in this context.
- Security best practices: Not applicable in this context.
- Potential security risks: Not identified in this context.
- Mitigation strategies: Not applicable in this context.
- Security testing requirements: Not applicable in this context.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Not applicable in this context.
- Integration test requirements: Ensure that the
BasicTable
component behaves as expected when used in different contexts (e.g.,UptimeTable
and potentially others). - Edge cases coverage: Test the component with large datasets to ensure performance is not negatively impacted.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case using Jest and React Testing Library
it('should change background color on hover using filter approach', () => {
const { getByTestId } = render(<BasicTable data={[]} />);
const row = getByTestId('row-0');
fireEvent.mouseOver(row);
expect(row).toHaveStyle('filter: brightness(.75)');
expect(row).toHaveStyle('opacity: 0.75');
});
- Coverage improvements: Ensure that the test suite covers the performance, consistency, and accessibility aspects of the change.
- Performance testing needs: Include performance tests to ensure that the tables remain responsive even with large datasets.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation for the
BasicTable
component to reflect the changes in hover behavior. - Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the
BasicTable
component is maintained and updated in line with the rest of the application. - Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Not applicable in this context.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes should be deployed as part of the regular deployment process for the application.
- Key operational considerations: Monitor the performance of the tables after deployment to ensure that the changes have not introduced any significant performance issues.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical changes required: Implement the suggested improvement using
backgroundColor
instead offilter
andopacity
to mitigate performance and accessibility issues. - Important improvements suggested: Thoroughly test the tables with assistive technologies to ensure accessibility.
- Best practices to implement: Use
backgroundColor
for hover effects to improve performance and accessibility. - Cross-cutting concerns to address: Ensure that the
BasicTable
component behaves as expected when used in different contexts. Monitor the performance of the tables after deployment.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: As the application evolves, ensure that the
BasicTable
component is maintained and updated in line with the rest of the application. - Business capability evolution: As the application's business capabilities evolve, ensure that the
BasicTable
component is adapted to meet the changing needs of the business. - System integration impacts: As the application is integrated with other systems, ensure that the
BasicTable
component is adapted to meet the needs of those integrations.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces subtle refinements to two React components: Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant UI as User Interface
participant Table as Table Component
participant Data as Data Source
UI->>Table: Hover over row
Table->>Table: Apply hover effect
Table->>Data: Potentially trigger data fetch
Data-->>Table: Return data (if applicable)
The sequence diagram illustrates the basic interaction during a table row hover, highlighting the potential for data interactions and the visual hover effect applied by the modified components. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
319-319
: Yo, we got a prop type mismatch! Fix it before your palms get sweaty!The prop type declaration uses
rowPerPage
but the component usesrowsPerPage
. Let's fix this to maintain type safety.Apply this diff to fix the prop type:
BasicTable.propTypes = { data: PropTypes.object.isRequired, paginated: PropTypes.bool, reversed: PropTypes.bool, - rowPerPage: PropTypes.number, + rowsPerPage: PropTypes.number, table: PropTypes.string, emptyMessage: PropTypes.string, };
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx (1)
147-147
: Yo! Let's address this TODO comment, dawg!Consider implementing the BasicTable component here to improve code reusability and maintain consistent table behavior across the application.
Want me to help sketch out how we could refactor this to use the BasicTable component? Just say the word!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx
(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/UptimeTable/index.jsx (1)
267-269
: Smooth moves with that hover effect! 🎵
The new hover implementation using filter and opacity creates a more consistent visual effect across the entire row. The transition timing is on point!
Though, let's verify this works well with all themes:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, that hover effect is straight fire! 🔥
Looking through the theme configurations and hover implementations across the codebase, the filter and opacity combo works perfectly with all themes! The background transitions in the theme are consistently handled through theme.palette.background
values, and this hover effect using filter/opacity is theme-agnostic - it'll work smoothly regardless of the theme's colour palette.
Plus, I spotted similar hover patterns in components like StatusBox and Sidebar that use opacity/filter transitions without any theme conflicts. This implementation is solid!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any theme-specific overrides that might affect the hover
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'palette.*background.*accent|palette.*hover'
Length of output: 2224
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the theme configuration to understand how hover states are handled
rg -g '*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' 'createTheme.*background|palette.*background' -A 5
# Also check for any existing hover effects in the table component
ast-grep --pattern 'hover: {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 30577
Client/src/Components/BasicTable/index.jsx (1)
219-221
: These hover effects are straight fire! 🔥
The hover implementation perfectly matches the UptimeTable component, maintaining consistency across the application. The transition timing is chef's kiss.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any technical issues, @gorkemcetin if you're OK with the styling I'm good on the technical side.
Here are screen captures, first row is hovered in both dark and light mode
I am fine with that! Thanks @marcelluscaio @ajhollid |
I decided to move away from changing background color and try a filter approach, that is applied to the whole row, which will help keep consistency (everything changes at once)
Solves: #1323