-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mix of static authorizer and subjectaccessreviews config deactivates the static authorizer #146
Comments
cc @ibihim can you take a look? |
I will try to do so next week. Thanks for the pointer |
2 tasks
2 tasks
simonpasquier
added a commit
to simonpasquier/cluster-monitoring-operator
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2024
Until brancz/kube-rbac-proxy#146 is implemented, we need a dedicated kube-rbac-proxy for static authz. Otherwise it will always do a SubjectAccessReview for requests authenticated using bearer tokens. Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <[email protected]>
2 tasks
simonpasquier
added a commit
to simonpasquier/cluster-monitoring-operator
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2024
Until brancz/kube-rbac-proxy#146 is implemented, we need a dedicated kube-rbac-proxy for static authz. Otherwise it will always do a SubjectAccessReview for requests authenticated using bearer tokens. Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <[email protected]>
simonpasquier
added a commit
to simonpasquier/cluster-monitoring-operator
that referenced
this issue
Feb 15, 2024
Until brancz/kube-rbac-proxy#146 is implemented, we need a dedicated kube-rbac-proxy for static authz. Otherwise it will always do a SubjectAccessReview for requests authenticated using bearer tokens. Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When putting both static authorizer and normal configs using subjectaccessreviews together in the config file, the part of static authorizer is not taken into account.
Here is an example. I would like to config kube-rbac-proxy to allow both using a bearer token and using a static authorizer to get access to the service behind its proxy.
I have tried 2 configs but neither of them allows both use cases:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: