Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[memcached] Removed groupId (duplicates parent). #535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2015

Conversation

mbrukman
Copy link
Contributor

For reference, other bindings don't appear to specify a groupId at this level
in their pom.xml files.

@shivam-maharshi says in a comment:

The groupId here is the duplicate of the parent groupId. This is creating a
problem in the maven build.

For reference, other bindings don't appear to specify a `groupId` at this level
in their `pom.xml` files.

@shivam-maharshi says in a [comment][1]:

> The groupId here is the duplicate of the parent groupId. This is creating a
> problem in the maven build.

  [1]: brianfrankcooper@d4b1d24#commitcomment-15030853
mbrukman referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
The memcached support was extracted from PR #98 by @jbellis, with cleanups to
bring it in line with current APIs and style guide.

This PR also addresses issue #326.
cmccoy added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
[memcached] Removed groupId (duplicates parent).
@cmccoy cmccoy merged commit 2c3e45f into brianfrankcooper:master Dec 17, 2015
@cmccoy
Copy link
Collaborator

cmccoy commented Dec 17, 2015

Thanks for the quick fix!

@bigbes bigbes mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2015
jaricftw pushed a commit to jaricftw/YCSB that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
…e-groupId

[memcached] Removed groupId (duplicates parent).
jaricftw pushed a commit to jaricftw/YCSB that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
…e-groupId

[memcached] Removed groupId (duplicates parent).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants