Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on establishing a FU #118

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

alyabolowich
Copy link

Clarification needed on when to use get_activity() or get().

@alyabolowich alyabolowich reopened this Aug 9, 2023
@michaelweinold
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @alyabolowich - thank you for your contribution!

In order for your new markdown file source/content/lca/calculate_lca.md to be rendered in the documentation, you will need to add it to the table of content of the source/content/lca/index.md file:

---
hidden:
maxdepth: 2
---
self
static_lca
stochastic_lca
calculate_lca

As for the content, perhaps @cmutel can have a look?

@alyabolowich
Copy link
Author

alyabolowich commented Aug 11, 2023 via email

@michaelweinold
Copy link
Contributor

but made the mistake of pushing to main

You did not push to the main branch of this repo (you don't have permission to do that). You pushed to the main branch of your fork of this repo (alyabolowich:main). This is fine - you correctly opened a pull request using your branch. No worries!

I will go ahead and delete what I added on main yesterday and make a new pull request with the forked repo.

There is no need for this. You can continue to work on the main branch of your fork and keep making commits. They will all show up in this pull request.

Just ping me (@michaelweinold) when you're ready 👏

Needs more clarity which is the best approach in BW25 -- get() or get_activity(). I have noticed some inconsistencies within BW25 depending on certain packages' versions.
@alyabolowich
Copy link
Author

Hi @michaelweinold,
I added the file to the TOC now. It should be OK. I will make further pull requests if I make modifications to that file.

Thanks! :)

@michaelweinold
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, thanks. In order to make the best use of our time I suggest that you keep working on that file on your own fork for now - as soon as you feel it's complete (for now), ping me to merge your PR.

@michaelweinold michaelweinold self-assigned this Sep 15, 2023
@michaelweinold
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, hello! After some time, I was able to have a close look at the pending issues and pull requests in the documentation repo.

I believe it makes sense to open your two questions to discussion in the Discussion tab. I have taken the liberty to move them there:

#123
#124

As soon as we've established satisfactory answers, we can open a PR with the appropriate information.

I'm still working on improving the contributions-workflow of the documentation (as well as the underlying structure). This should be complete by the Brightcon conference (are you attending, seeing as you're base in Luxembourg?).

@alyabolowich
Copy link
Author

Hello,
OK great - thanks for the update.
Yes, I'll see you at Brightcon!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants