-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove component union types #6913
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
c86c020
to
1b7c863
Compare
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @fitzgen, @peterhuene
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:wasm", "fuzzing", "wasmtime:api"
Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
6be3b47
to
a3d11f3
Compare
for ty in types.into_iter_err_on_gc_types() { | ||
let ty = environ.convert_func_type(&ty?); | ||
environ.declare_type_func(ty)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alexcrichton Updated this
for ty in types.into_iter_err_on_gc_types() { | ||
let ty = self.convert_func_type(&ty?); | ||
self.declare_type_func(ty)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...and this
I just pushed an update here anticipating a wit-bindgen 0.11.0 release. Obviously CI failed, but someone with access can hopefully just retrigger the CI jobs after that release and this should then be mergeable. The previous CI run against wit-bindgen |
At this rate I think I'll post a bump for 0.11.0 on Monday, but it'll definitely include this |
Oh oops wrong project, I see now! I think it's ok to avoid a wit-bindgen update here as that's mainly used for tests. The dependency between wit-bindgen and wasmtime mainly goes the other direction where wit-bindgen relies on wasmtime for tests, but it's ok in this regard for them to be slightly out of sync. |
Ah yeah I didn't really think that through. Well I'll fix it up when I get a chance if someone else doesnt get to it. |
9767ff1
to
fa76ff9
Compare
- Bump wasm-tools deps - Use new TypeSectionReader::into_iter_err_on_gc_types method
This should be ready now. |
- Bump wasm-tools deps - Use new TypeSectionReader::into_iter_err_on_gc_types method
...and bump wasm-tools deps.
Fixes #6871