Timer queue processor base v2 #3306
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yux0
reviewed
Jun 5, 2020
yux0
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2020
emrahs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2020
* Rewrite timer queue processor base with multi-cursor queue components * Create util functions for common parts in timer and transfer queue processor base * Use struct instead of pointer as timer/transfer task key * Move timerGate to queue package
yux0
pushed a commit
to yux0/cadence
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2021
* Rewrite timer queue processor base with multi-cursor queue components * Create util functions for common parts in timer and transfer queue processor base * Use struct instead of pointer as timer/transfer task key * Move timerGate to queue package
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
Why?
Part of multi-cursor queue implementation
How did you test it?
Unite test
Potential risks
N/A, implementation not wired up yet