Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: add non-empty custom scanner config to fix timer fixer #5433

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

Groxx
Copy link
Member

@Groxx Groxx commented Oct 27, 2023

This was accidentally broken in #5361 - this timer-fixer uses the shared
fixer workflow, which now expects non-empty config about what invariants
are enabled.

Since that'll help make this clearer / less "enable by default"-prone for
future timer-invariants, I've just added a static non-empty config.

This was accidentally broken in cadence-workflow#5361 - this timer-fixer uses the shared
fixer workflow, which now expects non-empty config about what invariants
are enabled.

Since that'll help make this clearer / less "enable by default"-prone for
future timer-invariants, I've just added a static non-empty config.
@Groxx Groxx enabled auto-merge (squash) November 14, 2023 00:22
@Groxx Groxx merged commit 878dad2 into cadence-workflow:master Nov 14, 2023
16 checks passed
@Groxx Groxx deleted the fix-timer-scanner branch November 14, 2023 01:28
Groxx added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2023
#5361 unfortunately broke timer-fixers, as the shared workflow requires a non-empty "enabled" list and none was provided in that PR.

#5433 restores that functionality.

---

Arguably `v1.2.5` could be retracted, as it introduces a potentially-problematic bug.

Since this fixer is disabled by default, we're going to skip doing that: we would have to publish `v1.2.6` to put the retraction into effect, and anyone updating that rapidly will not have much down-time.  Plus the fixer is not required for correct behavior.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants