adding indices to tables improves responsiveness #321
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…hen haven 1million+ instances stored.
|
@nitram509 really nice 👍 Thank you for your contribution 🎉 I'll review your PR soon. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR add missing indices to columns, which are used frequently.
I have a Zeebe Simple Monitor running and observed decreasing responsiveness/response times of the UI,
because I did some performance testing. In my scenario, I had 3 million process instances created.
This led to timeouts in the DB lookup.
Adding indices not only solved the problem but also made the UI significantly more responsive.
Any feedback is welcome.