-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: update client code+tests to use Requester interface #549
refactor: update client code+tests to use Requester interface #549
Conversation
I noticed there are some different usages like |
According to the discussion in the daily sync, we decided to use |
Yep, thanks. It is a bit more verbose, but it's also more consistent and easier to read, because of the field names instead of calling functions that take 6 positional arguments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All looks good, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removing the doAsync and doSync private helpers aligns it with how we use it in derivative projects, as we do not get access to these from outside. Just a pity the same code is copied in so many places.
Refactor client test framework to use the requester interface.
Closes #315.
See more information here in #310.