-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Breaking change in v1.1.0 #782
Comments
Do you have an isolated test case for what is breaking? I'm apprehensive there's a widely used corner case in async that async's tests don't cover... |
If you clone the forms repo, and run The gist seems to be "expected 4 assertions, got 0" which is implying that a previous async.forEach/forEachSeries call would iterate 4 times whereas now it doesn't iterate. |
The issue is that the forms tests are relying on |
OK - I'll certainly correct that, but "same tick" and "next tick" changes are definitely a breaking change. |
Thanks! |
Sure thing. v1.1.1 and v1.2.1 published |
(since caolan/async#782 is resolved)
caolan/forms’ tests pass on
v1.0.0
, but break onv1.1.0
andv1.2.0
.I'm still digging for the bug, but this means that
v1.1.0
should instead have beenv2.0.0
- once we find the fix, both the 1.1 and 1.2 branches will need a patch release to revert the breakage.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: