Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate description of tuple indexing into member access better. #3679

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2024

Conversation

zygoloid
Copy link
Contributor

@zygoloid zygoloid commented Feb 1, 2024

Improve the exposition of the design changes from #3646 to integrate better into the overall description of member access design.

This fixes the incorrect description of the rules for -> by instead relying on the general rule that -> is rewritten to use * and . before any other processing is done, and generally makes integer-literal names be less of a special case.

Improve design changes from #3646 to integrate better into the overall description of member access design.
@zygoloid zygoloid changed the title Integrate tuple indexing into member access better. Integrate description of tuple indexing into member access better. Feb 1, 2024
@geoffromer
Copy link
Contributor

(Not merging in case you wanted a review from both of us)

@zygoloid
Copy link
Contributor Author

zygoloid commented Feb 2, 2024

@chandlerc I think it'd be useful for a lead other than myself to confirm this isn't inadvertently changing the direction in some important way.

Copy link
Contributor

@chandlerc chandlerc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a good update to the docs without a direction change. Merging.

@chandlerc chandlerc added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into trunk with commit cb849cf Feb 3, 2024
10 checks passed
@chandlerc chandlerc deleted the zygoloid-patch-1 branch February 3, 2024 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants