Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change tuple index #4218

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

brymer-meneses
Copy link
Contributor

@brymer-meneses brymer-meneses commented Aug 15, 2024

This changes the tuple index from tuple[0] to tuple.0 in accordance with the accepted propsal #3646

I messed up syncing to trunk on my original PR #4186, that's why I'm starting on a blank state. Please let me know if I missed incorporating a change from my prior PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from josh11b August 15, 2024 08:47
Copy link
Contributor

@jonmeow jonmeow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Looks right here, I'm going to merge.

@jonmeow jonmeow enabled auto-merge August 15, 2024 15:27
@jonmeow jonmeow disabled auto-merge August 15, 2024 15:28
@jonmeow
Copy link
Contributor

jonmeow commented Aug 15, 2024

Sorry, can you run autoupdate again? Looks like there's still some small difference in the lowering output, a line of code change (sometimes these take a couple autoupdate runs to get fixed, when autoupdate causes the line numbers to change)

@brymer-meneses
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, about that. I think that should be resolved by now.

@jonmeow jonmeow enabled auto-merge August 15, 2024 15:48
@jonmeow jonmeow added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into carbon-language:trunk with commit c353f6b Aug 15, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants