fix: typos

[omahs]

fix: typos

[lemunozm]

Thanks for the corrections! 🙌🏻

[NunoAlexandre]

Thanks for contributing! One thing to fix

[NunoAlexandre]

That correction is not actually correct, since the desired semantic here is that 3 different accounts vote Aey, note that someone "should make 3 votes in favour of 3 different people".

Suggested change

	1. Voting phase. You should make 3 votes in favor of 3 different people (modify the CFG amount before to a low number).
	1. Voting phase. Three different account should vote in favour of the proposal (modify the CFG amount before to a low number).

[NunoAlexandre]

I'm also not sure we need 3 separate 👍 , 1 should be enough? 🤔 cc @wischli

[wischli]

I'm also not sure we need 3 separate 👍 , 1 should be enough? 🤔 cc @wischli

Our local chain specs setup 4 genesis council members

centrifuge-chain/src/chain_spec.rs

Lines 541 to 543 in 0387385

	fn council_members_bootstrap() -> Vec<cfg_primitives::AccountId> {
	endowed_accounts().into_iter().take(4).collect()
	}

Since both proposing an external referendum as well as fast-tracking requires at least half of the council, two votes would suffice. I suppose this is a remnant of previously requiring at least 75% of the council.

On that note, our runtime upgrade scripts votes with three members:

centrifuge-chain/scripts/js/upgrade/index.js

Lines 87 to 93 in 0387385

	console.log("Continuing with council vote using", result[0], result[1])
	nonce = await getNonce(api, alice.address);
	await councilVoteProposal(api, alice, result[0], result[1], nonce, false)
	nonce = await getNonce(api, bob.address);
	await councilVoteProposal(api, bob, result[0], result[1], nonce, false)
	nonce = await getNonce(api, charlie.address);
	await councilVoteProposal(api, charlie, result[0], result[1], nonce, true)

[wischli]

The number of votes must match the threshold set when proposing. The document currently states 3 (75%) which is outdated

1. In Governance -> Council -> Motions, click on **propose motion**.
-    - At **umbral**, put `3` (a 75% of the total which is 4).
+    - At **umbral**, put `2` (a 50% of the total which is 4).

[wischli]

Thanks for fixing our typos! As stated, some content of the readme should be updated as well most ideally. However, I am fine with merging these fixes as the content is not incorrect and fixing the details is out of scope of this PR in my opinion.

[NunoAlexandre]

Thanks for your contribution 🙏

[mustermeiszer]

@omahs still interested in bringing this in?

[omahs]

@mustermeiszer Hey, yes, should I edit something?

[mustermeiszer]

LGTM! Thanks for your contribution.

[wischli]

Thanks for your contribution!