Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: helder testnet tx spammer #122

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

thedevbirb
Copy link
Contributor

@thedevbirb thedevbirb commented Jul 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new configuration file for environment variables.
    • Added support for managing Ethereum transactions and interacting with beacon chains.
    • Implemented functions for fetching validator data and interacting with a registry contract.
  • Improvements

    • Updated dependencies in Cargo.toml for enhanced functionality and performance.
  • Documentation

    • Added comprehensive documentation for new configuration variables, constants, and functions.
  • Chores

    • Updated .gitignore to exclude target/ directory and .env file.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce significant enhancements to the bolt-spammer-helder project, including new environment configuration, updates to dependencies, functions to interact with an Ethereum registry, and utility functions for generating and signing Ethereum transactions. The project now includes setup for constants, main logic for the application, and structured modules for improved maintainability and functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
bolt-spammer-helder/.env.example Added environment variables for provider URL, registry address, etc.
bolt-spammer-helder/.gitignore Added target/ directory and .env file to .gitignore
bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.toml Updated dependencies such as tokio, eyre, ethers, etc.
bolt-spammer-helder/registry_abi.json Introduced constructors, functions, and events for registry system
bolt-spammer-helder/src/constants.rs Added public constants for various configuration values
bolt-spammer-helder/src/contract.rs Added functions to interact with registry contracts
bolt-spammer-helder/src/lib.rs Introduced modules: constants, contract, and utils
bolt-spammer-helder/src/main.rs Introduced main logic for interacting with Ethereum transactions
bolt-spammer-helder/src/utils.rs Utility functions for generating and signing Ethereum transactions

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Application
    participant RegistryContract
    participant EthereumProvider
    participant BeaconApiClient

    User->>Application: Provide configuration and run
    Application->>EthereumProvider: Connect to provider URL
    Application->>RegistryContract: Query next preconfirmation slot
    RegistryContract-->>Application: Return slot data and proposer URL
    Application->>BeaconApiClient: Fetch current slot
    BeaconApiClient-->>Application: Return current slot
    Application->>EthereumProvider: Generate and sign transaction
    Application->>EthereumProvider: Send transaction for preconfirmation
    EthereumProvider-->>Application: Confirmation response
    Application-->>User: Display transaction result
Loading

This sequence diagram outlines the primary flow for the bolt-spammer-helder tool, showcasing the interaction between the user, application, registry contract, Ethereum provider, and beacon API client. It highlights the configuration setup, querying of slots, generation and signing of transactions, and the communication of the result back to the user.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@thedevbirb thedevbirb marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between be36873 and c617f29.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (9)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/.env.example (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/registry_abi.json (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/src/constants.rs (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
  • bolt-spammer-helder/src/utils.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (47)
bolt-spammer-helder/.gitignore (1)

1-2: LGTM!

The additions to the .gitignore file are appropriate and follow best practices.

bolt-spammer-helder/src/lib.rs (1)

1-3: LGTM!

The new module declarations improve the modularity and organization of the codebase.

bolt-spammer-helder/.env.example (1)

1-5: LGTM!

The new environment variables provide a clear template for necessary configuration, enhancing ease of setup.

Ensure that the .env.example file is up-to-date with all required variables.

bolt-spammer-helder/src/constants.rs (1)

1-4: LGTM!

The new constants are essential for the application's configuration and operation.

bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.toml (12)

9-9: LGTM! Dependency tokio is correctly added with appropriate features.


10-10: LGTM! Dependency eyre is correctly added.


11-11: LGTM! Dependency ethers is correctly added.


12-12: LGTM! Dependency rand is correctly added.


13-13: LGTM! Dependency clap is correctly added with appropriate features.


14-14: LGTM! Dependency tracing is correctly added.


15-15: LGTM! Dependency tracing-subscriber is correctly added.


16-16: LGTM! Dependency serde is correctly added with appropriate feature.


17-17: LGTM! Dependency serde_json is correctly added.


18-18: LGTM! Dependency reqwest is correctly added.


19-19: LGTM! Dependency beacon-api-client is correctly added from the specified repository and revision.


20-20: LGTM! Dependency dotenvy is correctly added.

bolt-spammer-helder/src/utils.rs (3)

13-26: LGTM! Function generate_random_tx is correctly implemented.


45-52: LGTM! Function prepare_rpc_request is correctly implemented.


54-63: LGTM! Function current_slot is correctly implemented.

bolt-spammer-helder/src/contract.rs (2)

12-64: LGTM! Function next_preconfer_from_registry is correctly implemented.


66-97: LGTM! Function try_parse_url_from_token is correctly implemented.

bolt-spammer-helder/src/main.rs (6)

1-19: LGTM! Imports are correctly added and necessary for the functionality.


21-43: LGTM! Struct Opts is correctly defined with necessary fields.


45-56: LGTM! Main function setup is correctly implemented.


58-66: LGTM! Beacon API client initialization and slot retrieval are correctly implemented.


68-90: LGTM! Proposer duties retrieval and next pre-confirmation slot determination are correctly implemented.


92-131: LGTM! Transaction generation, signing, and sending are correctly implemented.

bolt-spammer-helder/registry_abi.json (20)

3-12: Constructor looks good.

The constructor is defined correctly with a _minimumCollateral input of type uint256 and nonpayable state mutability.


14-19: Function EXIT_COOLDOWN looks good.

The function correctly returns a uint256 value with view state mutability.


20-26: Function MINIMUM_COLLATERAL looks good.

The function correctly returns a uint256 value with view state mutability.


27-39: Function confirmExit looks good.

The function takes an address payable input and has nonpayable state mutability.


40-46: Function delegations looks good.

The function takes a uint64 input and returns an address with view state mutability.


47-102: Function getOperatorForValidator looks good.

The function takes a uint64 input and returns a complex data structure with view state mutability.


103-117: Function getOperatorStatus looks good.

The function takes an address input and returns an enum IBoltRegistry.Status with view state mutability.


118-126: Function isActiveOperator looks good.

The function takes an address input and returns a bool with view state mutability.


127-141: Function register looks good.

The function takes uint64[], string, and bytes inputs and has payable state mutability.


142-171: Function registrants looks good.

The function takes an address input and returns a complex data structure with view state mutability.


172-178: Function startExit looks good.

The function has no inputs and has nonpayable state mutability.


180-207: Event Registered looks good.

The event includes indexed and non-indexed fields, which are correctly defined.


208-226: Event StatusChange looks good.

The event includes indexed and non-indexed fields, which are correctly defined.


227-227: Error AlreadyOptedIn looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.


228-228: Error BasedProposerDoesNotExist looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.


229-229: Error CooldownNotElapsed looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.


230-230: Error InsufficientCollateral looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.


231-231: Error InvalidStatusChange looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.


232-232: Error NotFound looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.


233-233: Error Unauthorized looks good.

The error is correctly defined with no inputs.

Comment on lines +28 to +43
/// Signs a [TypedTransaction] with the given [Signer], returning a tuple
/// with the transaction hash and the RLP-encoded signed transaction.
pub async fn sign_transaction<S: Signer>(
signer: &S,
tx: TypedTransaction,
) -> Result<(String, String)> {
let Ok(signature) = signer.sign_transaction(&tx).await else {
eyre::bail!("Failed to sign transaction")
};

let rlp_signed_tx = tx.rlp_signed(&signature);
let tx_hash = format!("0x{:x}", tx.hash(&signature));
let hex_rlp_signed_tx = format!("0x{}", hex::encode(rlp_signed_tx));

Ok((tx_hash, hex_rlp_signed_tx))
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Function sign_transaction is correctly implemented but consider a more conventional error handling approach.

The usage of let Ok(signature) is unconventional. Consider using a match statement for better readability.

let signature = match signer.sign_transaction(&tx).await {
    Ok(sig) => sig,
    Err(_) => eyre::bail!("Failed to sign transaction"),
};

Copy link
Collaborator

@merklefruit merklefruit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@merklefruit merklefruit merged commit bf305d7 into unstable Jul 6, 2024
@merklefruit merklefruit deleted the feat/spammer/helder branch July 6, 2024 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants