Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(sidecar): wrong slot-diff while checking preconf #123

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

thedevbirb
Copy link
Contributor

@thedevbirb thedevbirb commented Jul 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced update_head function to track slot information, improving transaction validation and state updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved execution state management by introducing slot tracking.

@thedevbirb thedevbirb added C: bolt-sidecar Component: bolt-sidecar T: bug Type: Bug labels Jul 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve updating the update_head function across multiple files to include an additional slot parameter. This modification aims to enhance the tracking of execution states by incorporating slot information, affecting the control flow in the main function and related test modules.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs Modified update_head function call in the main async function to include an additional slot argument.
bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs Added slot field to ExecutionState, updated update_head method to accept slot, and adjusted slot_diff calculations.
bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs Updated update_head function call within the test module to include an extra receipt.block_number.unwrap() parameter.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Old Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant MainFunction
    participant ExecutionState

    MainFunction->>ExecutionState: update_head(None).await
    ExecutionState-->>MainFunction: Result<(), TransportError>
Loading

New Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant MainFunction
    participant ExecutionState

    MainFunction->>ExecutionState: update_head(None, slot).await
    ExecutionState-->>MainFunction: Result<(), TransportError>
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@thedevbirb thedevbirb marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2024 14:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f6ee158 and a80fe03.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (1 hunks)
  • bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (4 hunks)
  • bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (1)

125-125: Ensure correct usage of the slot parameter.

The update_head function call now includes a slot parameter. Verify that the slot value is correctly passed and used throughout the codebase.

bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (1)

300-303: Ensure correct usage of the receipt_number parameter.

The update_head function call now includes a receipt_number parameter. Verify that the receipt_number value is correctly passed and used throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

Verified: The receipt_number parameter is correctly passed and used in the update_head function.

  • The update_head function in mod.rs has been updated to include the receipt_number parameter.
  • The function signatures and their usages across the codebase are consistent.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `update_head` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type rust $'update_head'

Length of output: 531


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the `update_head` function signatures and their usages.

# Inspect the function signature in `mod.rs`.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'async fn update_head($_, $_) -> $_ { $$$ }' bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs

# Inspect the function signature in `consensus.rs`.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'async fn update_head($_) -> $_ { $$$ }' bolt-sidecar/src/state/consensus.rs

# Inspect the function signature in `execution.rs`.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'async fn update_head($_, $_) -> $_ { $$$ }' bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs

# Verify the function calls in `sidecar.rs` match the signatures.
rg 'update_head\(' bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs

Length of output: 534

bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (3)

93-93: LGTM!

The slot field is correctly initialized to 0 in the new method.


191-200: Ensure correct usage of the slot parameter.

The update_head method now accepts a slot parameter and updates the slot field. Verify that the slot value is correctly passed and used throughout the codebase.


67-69: Ensure correct usage of the slot field.

The ExecutionState struct now includes a slot field. Verify that the slot value is correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.

@merklefruit merklefruit merged commit 05fa0a9 into unstable Jul 5, 2024
@merklefruit merklefruit deleted the fix/sidecar/slot branch July 5, 2024 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C: bolt-sidecar Component: bolt-sidecar T: bug Type: Bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants