-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prefer ansible.builtin.include_role to a roles block #226
Merged
mcdonnnj
merged 5 commits into
develop
from
improvement/prefer-include-role-to-roles-block
May 22, 2023
Merged
Prefer ansible.builtin.include_role to a roles block #226
mcdonnnj
merged 5 commits into
develop
from
improvement/prefer-include-role-to-roles-block
May 22, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The former is more flexible, as described in #198.
jsf9k
added
improvement
This issue or pull request will add or improve functionality, maintainability, or ease of use
kraken 🐙
This pull request is ready to merge during the next Lineage Kraken release
labels
Feb 27, 2023
dav3r
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 👍
mcdonnnj
reviewed
Feb 27, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the direction this PR is taking us but I have a request and a question for your consideration.
Co-authored-by: Nicholas McDonnell <[email protected]>
If pip is installed first, then the OS _could_ pull different Python packages than what would be installed via the cisagov/ansible-role-python role; hence, the new ordering is more controlled. Co-authored-by: Nicholas McDonnell <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dav3r <[email protected]>
mcdonnnj
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2023
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement
This issue or pull request will add or improve functionality, maintainability, or ease of use
kraken 🐙
This pull request is ready to merge during the next Lineage Kraken release
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🗣 Description
This pull request:
ansible.builtin.include_role
to aroles
block in playbooks and playbook fragmentssrc/requirements.txt
💭 Motivation and context
ansible.builtin.include_role
is more flexible, as described in Consider preferring include_role to using a roles block in Ansible playbooks #198.Resolves #198.
🧪 Testing
All automated tests pass.
✅ Pre-approval checklist
✅ Pre-merge checklist
✅ Post-merge checklist