Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[terratest] Update flags #61

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

[terratest] Update flags #61

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

goruha
Copy link
Contributor

@goruha goruha commented Dec 26, 2024

what

  • Update flags

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved accuracy of GitHub status updates for test contexts and cleanup processes.
  • Chores

    • Enhanced testing commands to skip certain deployment and destruction dependencies, streamlining workflow execution.

@goruha goruha requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2024 16:27
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file shared-terraform-chatops.yml, focusing on refining test execution and status reporting. The changes introduce new flags for go test commands in the fixtures and terratest jobs, allowing more granular control over test deployment and destruction dependencies. Additionally, the workflow enhances GitHub status updates in the pending and cleanup jobs to provide more precise feedback about the test and cleanup processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/shared-terraform-chatops.yml - Added -cth.skip-deploy-cut flag to go test in fixtures job
- Added -cth.skip-destroy-deps flag to go test in terratest job
- Enhanced status update steps in pending and cleanup jobs

Poem

🐰 Workflow rabbit hops with glee,
Testing flags now set us free!
Skip deploy, destroy with grace,
GitHub status finds its place.
Continuous integration's delight! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Important

Title is necessary and should not be empty.

Kindly provide a meaningful title for this Pull Request.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Important

Cloud Posse Engineering Team Review Required

This pull request modifies files that require Cloud Posse's review. Please be patient, and a core maintainer will review your changes.

To expedite this process, reach out to us on Slack in the #pr-reviews channel.

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-cloudposse Needs Cloud Posse assistance label Dec 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/shared-terraform-chatops.yml (1)

Line range hint 311-713: Document custom test flags

The workflow uses several custom flags (-cth.skip-*) across different jobs. To improve maintainability:

Consider adding a comment block at the top of the workflow file documenting:

  1. The purpose of each custom flag
  2. The impact of skipping each step
  3. Dependencies between different skip flags
name: "Shared Terraform ChatOps"

+# Custom Test Flags:
+# -cth.skip-deploy-cut: Skips deployment cutting step
+# -cth.skip-deploy-deps: Skips deployment of dependencies
+# -cth.skip-destroy-deps: Skips cleanup of dependencies
+# 
+# Note: These flags should be used carefully as they may affect:
+# - Test isolation
+# - Resource cleanup
+# - Overall test reliability

on:
  workflow_call:
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 540-540: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99f42c9 and f63ea17.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/shared-terraform-chatops.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/shared-terraform-chatops.yml (3)

311-311: Verify the impact of skipping deployment and dependency cleanup in fixtures job

The addition of -cth.skip-deploy-cut -cth.skip-destroy-deps flags might affect test isolation. Please ensure that:

  1. Test fixtures are properly isolated between runs
  2. Dependencies are properly managed despite skipping destroy steps

Consider adding comments to document the purpose and impact of these custom flags for future maintainers.


713-713: Verify cleanup completeness with skipped deployment

The addition of -cth.skip-deploy-cut in the cleanup job might affect resource cleanup. Please ensure that:

  1. All resources are properly cleaned up despite skipping deployment steps
  2. The cleanup process is reliable and complete

Consider adding a validation step to verify that all resources have been properly cleaned up after the job completes.


539-539: Verify test dependencies management in terratest job

The addition of -cth.skip-deploy-deps -cth.skip-destroy-deps flags in the terratest job raises some considerations:

  1. Ensure that required dependencies are available despite skipping deployment
  2. Verify that skipping destroy steps doesn't lead to resource leaks

Run this script to check for potential resource leaks:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the test dependencies and cleanup mechanisms.


Let me analyze the workflow structure and generate the final response.

Test dependencies and cleanup are properly managed in the workflow

After analyzing the workflow, I can confirm that the test dependencies and cleanup are properly managed:

  1. The workflow has a dedicated fixtures job that handles test dependencies setup before running the tests
  2. The -cth.skip-deploy-deps -cth.skip-destroy-deps flags in the terratest job are safe because:
    • Dependencies are already deployed by the fixtures job (using go test -v -cth.skip-tmp-dir -cth.skip-deploy-cut -cth.skip-destroy-deps)
    • The state is preserved and shared between jobs using artifacts
  3. A dedicated cleanup job runs in the always() condition to ensure proper cleanup:
    • It runs even if the test jobs fail
    • Uses the preserved state to clean up resources
    • Executes with -cth.skip-deploy-cut flag to focus on cleanup
  4. The workflow has proper error handling and status reporting for all stages

The implementation ensures that resources are properly managed throughout the test lifecycle, preventing resource leaks while maintaining test isolation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for patterns that might indicate resource cleanup in test files
# Look for cleanup/destroy related patterns in test files

cd test
# Check for cleanup patterns in test files
rg -A 5 'cleanup|destroy|defer' 

# Check for resource declaration patterns
rg -A 5 'NewTestingT|resource\.' 

Length of output: 1150


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and their dependency management patterns
fd -e go -e tf test --exec rg -A 5 -i "cth\.skip|deploy-deps|destroy-deps|cleanup" {}

# Look for test configuration and setup
fd -e go test --exec rg -A 5 "testing\.|NewTest|resource\." {}

# Check the workflow file for context
cat .github/workflows/shared-terraform-chatops.yml

Length of output: 34058

@goruha goruha merged commit 68f5c1d into main Dec 26, 2024
9 checks passed
@goruha goruha deleted the terratest-update-flags branch December 26, 2024 17:56
@mergify mergify bot removed the needs-cloudposse Needs Cloud Posse assistance label Dec 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant