KNET-15501 work around jackson databind string length limit #1272
+25
−8
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Implement the change from FasterXML/jackson-core#1001 (comment) I'm using maxint for the value, as we do length checks of the stream elsewhere, and this seems safest to avoid a regression (see the code comment for more details)
trnguyencflt
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
msn-tldr
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
akhileshchg
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
|
Restarted the build |
|
The build failure is due to https://confluentinc.atlassian.net/browse/KNET-15458 so we need to wait for that to be resolved before this will run through. |
|
Pint merged up from 7.7 instead, closing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement the change from FasterXML/jackson-core#1001 (comment)
I'm using maxint for the value, as we do length checks of the stream elsewhere, and this seems safest to avoid a regression (see the code comment for more details)