Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check and fix typos in CI #1360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind ci

What this PR does / why we need it:

We now verify any typos in CI and fix them.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fixed API typos in golang client.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@@ -1017,9 +1017,9 @@ func (c *ConmonClient) metadataBytes(ctx context.Context) ([]byte, error) {
return metadata, nil
}

// CreateaNamespacesConfig is the configuration for calling the
// CreateNamespacesConfig is the configuration for calling the
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need type aliases to keep backward compatibility?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

though I don't know if we're using this anywhere so it may not actually matter..

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No right now it’s not being used.

@haircommander
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label May 17, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 75f5beb into containers:main May 17, 2023
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the typos branch May 19, 2023 06:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants