English STT v1.0.0-yesno
English STT v1.0.0 (yesno)
Jump to section:
- Model details
- Intended use
- Performance Factors
- Metrics
- Training data
- Evaluation data
- Ethical considerations
- Caveats and recommendations
Model details
- Person or organization developing model: Maintained by Coqui.
- Model language: English / English /
en
- Model date: October 3, 2021
- Model type:
Small vocabulary Speech-to-Text
- Model version:
yesno-v1.0.0
- Compatible with 🐸 STT version:
v1.0.0
- License: Apache 2.0
- Citation details:
@techreport{english-stt, author = {Coqui}, title = {English STT v1.0.0}, institution = {Coqui}, address = {\url{https://coqui.ai/models}} year = {2021}, month = {October}, number = {STT-EN-1.0.0} }
- Where to send questions or comments about the model: You can leave an issue on
STT
issues, open a new discussion onSTT
discussions, or chat with us on Gitter.
Intended use
Closed vocabulary ("yes" and "no") Speech-to-Text for the English Language on 16kHz, mono-channel audio. This acoustic model and language model pair will only be able to recognize the words "yes" and "no", which is a common use case in IVR systems.
Performance Factors
Factors relevant to Speech-to-Text performance include but are not limited to speaker demographics, recording quality, and background noise. Read more about STT performance factors here.
Metrics
Model Size
For STT, you always must deploy an acoustic model, and it is often the case you also will want to deploy an application-specific language model. The acoustic model comes in two forms: quantized and unquantized. There is a size<->accuracy trade-off for acoustic model quantization. For this combination of acoustic model and language model, we optimize for small size.
Model type | Vocabulary | Filename | Size |
---|---|---|---|
Acoustic model | open | model_quantized.tflite |
46M |
Language model | small | yesno.scorer |
640B |
Approaches to uncertainty and variability
Confidence scores and multiple paths from the decoding beam can be used to measure model uncertainty and provide multiple, variable transcripts for any processed audio.
Training data
This model was trained on the following corpora: Common Voice 7.0 English (custom Coqui train/dev/test splits), LibriSpeech, and Multilingual Librispeech. In total approximately ~47,000 hours of data.
Evaluation data
The validation ("dev") sets came from CV, Librispeech, and MLS. Testing accuracy is reported for MLS and Librispeech.
Ethical considerations
Deploying a Speech-to-Text model into any production setting has ethical implications. You should consider these implications before use.
Demographic Bias
You should assume every machine learning model has demographic bias unless proven otherwise. For STT models, it is often the case that transcription accuracy is better for men than it is for women. If you are using this model in production, you should acknowledge this as a potential issue.
Surveillance
Speech-to-Text may be mis-used to invade the privacy of others by recording and mining information from private conversations. This kind of individual privacy is protected by law in may countries. You should not assume consent to record and analyze private speech.
Caveats and recommendations
Machine learning models (like this STT model) perform best on data that is similar to the data on which they were trained. Read about what to expect from an STT model with regard to your data here.
In most applications, it is recommended that you train your own language model to improve transcription accuracy on your speech data.