German STT v0.9.0
German STT v0.9.0 (Aashish Agarwal)
Jump to section:
- Model details
- Intended use
- Performance Factors
- Metrics
- Training data
- Evaluation data
- Ethical considerations
- Caveats and recommendations
Model details
- Person or organization developing model: Originally trained by Aashish Agarwal and released under the deepspeech-german project.
- Model date: Accessed from deepspeech-german on March 31, 2021
- Model type:
Speech-to-Text
- Model version:
v0.9.0
- Compatible with 🐸 STT version:
v0.9.3
- Code: deepspeech-german
- License: Apache 2.0
- Citation details:
@inproceedings{agarwal-zesch-2019-german, author = "Aashish Agarwal and Torsten Zesch", title = "German End-to-end Speech Recognition based on DeepSpeech", booktitle = "Preliminary proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2019): Long Papers", year = "2019", address = "Erlangen, Germany", publisher = "German Society for Computational Linguistics \& Language Technology", pages = "111--119" }
- Where to send questions or comments about the model: You can leave an issue on
STT-model
issues, open a new discussion onSTT-model
discussions, or chat with us on Gitter.
Intended use
Speech-to-Text for the German Language on 16kHz, mono-channel audio.
Performance Factors
Factors relevant to Speech-to-Text performance include but are not limited to speaker demographics, recording quality, and background noise. Read more about STT performance factors here.
Metrics
STT models are usually evaluated in terms of their transcription accuracy, deployment Real-Time Factor, and model size on disk.
Transcription Accuracy
No exact statistics on transcription accuracy, however, Word Error Rate was in the range of 10% to 20% on Mozilla and Tuda-De test set. Relevant discussion here.
Real-Time Factor
Real-Time Factor (RTF) is defined as proccesing-time / length-of-audio
. The exact real-time factor of an STT model will depend on the hardware setup, so you may experience a different RTF.
Recorded average RTF on laptop CPU: .69
Model Size
model.pbmm
: 181M
model.tflite
: 46M
Approaches to uncertainty and variability
Confidence scores and multiple paths from the decoding beam can be used to measure model uncertainty and provide multiple, variable transcripts for any processed audio.
Training data
This German STT model was bootstrapped from a pre-trained English model, and fine-tuned to German via the following datasets: Common Voice 5.1 (750 hours) + SWC (248 hours) + MAILABS (233 hours) + Tuda-De (184 hours) + Voxforge (57 hours).
Evaluation data
This German STT model was evaluated on the following datasets: Common Voice 5.1 and Tuda-De.
Ethical considerations
Deploying a Speech-to-Text model into any production setting has ethical implications. You should consider these implications before use.
Demographic Bias
You should assume every machine learning model has demographic bias unless proven otherwise. For STT models, it is often the case that transcription accuracy is better for men than it is for women. If you are using this model in production, you should acknowledge this as a potential issue.
Surveillance
Speech-to-Text may be mis-used to invade the privacy of others by recording and mining information from private conversations. This kind of individual privacy is protected by law in may countries. You should not assume consent to record and analyze private speech.
Caveats and recommendations
Machine learning models (like this STT model) perform best on data that is similar to the data on which they were trained. Read about what to expect from an STT model with regard to your data here.
In most applications, it is recommended that you train your own language model to improve transcription accuracy on your speech data.