-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: fix spelling errors #19756
chore: fix spelling errors #19756
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent update involves correcting a typographical error in the field name Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/tx.proto (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/tx.proto (1)
- 119-119: The correction from
reciever
toreceiver
in theMsgWithdrawResponse
message is a positive change for code readability and consistency. However, it's crucial to be aware that such changes can impact compatibility with existing systems that use this protobuf definition. Ensure that all references to this field are updated and consider the need for thorough testing to prevent issues in production.Verification successful
The correction from
reciever
toreceiver
in theMsgWithdrawResponse
message has been successfully verified. The updated field namereceiver
is consistently used within the specified protobuf files, and the old field namereciever
is no longer present. This ensures code readability and consistency without impacting compatibility due to unresolved references to the old field name.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated field name is consistently used across the Go codebase. rg --type proto "receiver" x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/ # Verify that the old field name is no longer used. rg --type proto "reciever" x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/ | wc -l | awk '{if($1 > 0) {exit 1}}'Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated field name "receiver" is consistently used across the codebase within protobuf files. rg "receiver" x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/ # Verify that the old field name "reciever" is no longer used within protobuf files. rg "reciever" x/accounts/proto/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/ | wc -l | awk '{if($1 > 0) {exit 1}}'Length of output: 329
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (1)
- 314-314: The correction from
Reciever
toReceiver
in theWithdrawUnlockedCoins
method is a positive change for code readability and consistency. However, it's crucial to be aware that such changes can impact the function's callers if they rely on named return values. Ensure that all references to this variable are updated and consider the need for thorough testing to prevent issues in production.Verification successful
The verification process confirms that the variable name "Receiver" has been correctly updated in the
lockup.go
file, and the old misspelled variable name "Reciever" is no longer used in the specified directory. This indicates that the typo correction has been thoroughly implemented. No further issues were found.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated variable name is consistently used across the Go codebase. rg --type go "Receiver" x/accounts/defaults/lockup/ # Verify that the old variable name is no longer used. rg --type go "Reciever" x/accounts/defaults/lockup/ | wc -l | awk '{if($1 > 0) {exit 1}}'Length of output: 211
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (2)
- api/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/tx.pulsar.go (15 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/types/tx.pb.go (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- api/cosmos/accounts/defaults/lockup/tx.pulsar.go
Additional comments: 2
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/types/tx.pb.go (2)
- 449-449: The spelling correction from "Reciever" to "Receiver" in the
MsgWithdrawResponse
struct aligns with the PR's objective to fix spelling errors for clarity and consistency.- 486-488: The getter method
GetReceiver
correctly reflects the updated field name spelling. This change is consistent with the PR's objective and improves code readability.
This PR fixes typos in the codebase.
Please review it, and merge if everything is fine.
If there are proto changes, run
make proto-gen
and commit the changes.Summary by CodeRabbit
Reciever
toReceiver
in the withdrawal functionality, ensuring clarity and accuracy in transactions.