remove totmPubkey

[tac0turtle]

Description

remove to tmpubkeys
disentangle tendermint keys from the sdk

closes: #7529

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards.
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7652 into master will increase coverage by 5.68%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7652      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   54.14%   59.82%   +5.68%     
==========================================
  Files         611      317     -294     
  Lines       38558    17988   -20570     
==========================================
- Hits        20876    10761   -10115     
+ Misses      15550     6079    -9471     
+ Partials     2132     1148     -984     

[tac0turtle]

I'm going to revert the removal of totmpubkey, how tendermint keys are now used in the sdk complicates quite a lot and I don't want to spend time untangling something that seems to be done on purpose

[colin-axner]

I'm going to revert the removal of totmpubkey, how tendermint keys are now used in the sdk complicates quite a lot and I don't want to spend time untangling something that seems to be done on purpose

This sounds like a good move, I think staking needs to be refactored a bit before this move can be made. One too many assumptions that tendermint is the consensus algo being used

[amaury1093]

@marbar3778 After our offline conversation, one of @blushi @robert-zaremba or me can take ownership of this PR to bring it over the finish line, does that sound good to you?

[robert-zaremba]

I had a quick check with @marbar3778 about the status / support. Implementation is done, but we still need to update the tests. If I will have time later today, I will have a look at the tests.

[amaury1093]

superseded by #7419 and #7838