Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial support of a "Lasertag" toy protocol #374

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 13, 2017
Merged

Initial support of a "Lasertag" toy protocol #374

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 13, 2017

Conversation

crankyoldgit
Copy link
Owner

  • sendLasertag() & decodeLasertag() for issue RC5 mod signal not working properly #366
  • Add an option of a fixed 'delta' to the core matching functions.
  • Tweak getRClevel() to allow custom tolerances, excess levels, and fixed ranges.
  • Unit tests for Lasertag etc.
  • Update example code & tools for this protocol.

* sendLasertag() & decodeLasertag() for issue #366
* Tweak getRClevel() to allow custom tolerances and excess levels.
* Unit tests for Lasertag etc.
* Update example code & tools for this protocol.
* Add an option of a fixed 'delta' to the matching functions.
* Tune decodeLaserTag() to use a fixed range matching instead of excess and percentage tolerances.
* Add more unit test cases from #366
* Add LASERTAG to known encodings.
Reported issue decoding Red units 1 & 2
data from Arduino-IRremote/Arduino-IRremote#532 (comment)
Return end of capture detection check to be the old '>='.
Copy link
Collaborator

@darshkpatel darshkpatel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crankyoldgit
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks for the review @darshkpatel !

@crankyoldgit crankyoldgit merged commit 7bd411a into master Dec 13, 2017
@crankyoldgit crankyoldgit deleted the lasertag branch December 17, 2017 06:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants