-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 836
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor to use common routines/macros to handle bit manipulation. #934
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3624a23
Basic function to get/setBits.
crankyoldgit e5e2121
Add setBit() via pointer
crankyoldgit ea4d67b
Improve bit functions
crankyoldgit f7dc6c0
Use std routines for all single bit operations for A/Cs.
crankyoldgit b7fdac9
Add irutils::setBits()
crankyoldgit 14138fd
Improvements to setBits() and GETBIT*() handling.
crankyoldgit 8221112
Modify existing a/c code to use setBits()/GETBITS().
crankyoldgit bb7a36d
Correct issues introduced after merge.
crankyoldgit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are all masks changed, or just specific ones?
I find the the new way of using offsets much harder to understand compared to using masks - this might lead to it being harder for others to understand the code, and contribute. - I do clearly see the benefits in other places.
It might however be better to have functions that works with mask directly, instead of introducing offsets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Almost all masks have been changed. The exceptions at this stage are masks like
0b00100100
where the mask isn't contiguous.Personally, I preferred simple bit masks. but a lot of people had trouble understanding them. When refactoring the code, I found a few examples of either poor masks that I had done, or ones that were wrong.
I often get them wrong when writing the code but people don't see that as I write unit tests to make sure things behave the way I expect, not the way I've initially written the code. :-)
You can still use the old ways of doing it.
I'll probably add some routines to allow arbitrary masks to this PR.