Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build binary crate in CI test with nightly as well as stable #599

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Build binary crate in CI test with nightly as well as stable #599

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tonyg
Copy link

@tonyg tonyg commented Oct 13, 2021

Hopefully this isn't a completely silly idea :) but I wonder if (in connection with #598) building with nightly as part of CI makes sense? This PR makes an extremely small change to test.sh which should (?) build the binary hello crate both with stable and nightly toolchains.

@tonyg tonyg requested review from Dylan-DPC-zz and a team as code owners October 13, 2021 14:57
@tonyg
Copy link
Author

tonyg commented Oct 13, 2021

Promisingly, ci is failing on aarch64-unknown-linux-musl as expected per #598 ...

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

Im not sure this is something we want, but it seems sane enough.

@reitermarkus
Copy link
Member

It seems arbitrary to only test nightly in that specific spot. Generally I see testing nightly as only making our CI more error prone without having an easy way to fix it when it happens.

When something breaks on nightly, it will either need to be fixed upstream in Rust or in the Docker image by someone who is using that target and can actually debug the problem effectively.

@Alexhuszagh Alexhuszagh added S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label). needs-decision labels May 29, 2022
@otavio
Copy link
Contributor

otavio commented Jun 3, 2022

I don't see much value in adding it. @reitermarkus made raised very good concerns about it and I agree fully with him. For me, this could be closed.

@Alexhuszagh
Copy link
Contributor

Also in agreement with closing this.

@Alexhuszagh Alexhuszagh added the pending-close Issue will be closed if no further comments label Jun 3, 2022
@otavio otavio closed this Jun 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-decision pending-close Issue will be closed if no further comments S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants