Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

freebsd: Include libdevstat in build image #620

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jszwedko
Copy link
Contributor

@jszwedko jszwedko commented Dec 29, 2021

Similar to #613 include libdevstat seems to be required by the libc crate now too. Probably due to rust-lang/libc@ac6e16b

Similar to cross-rs#613 include
libdevstat seems to be required now too. Probably due to
rust-lang/libc@ac6e16b

Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@Emilgardis Emilgardis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, ci is blocked rn, need #609, r+ afterwards

pitkley added a commit to pitkley/in-container that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
CI is currently failing due to [1] and [2], and they are not getting
merged upstream due to [3] being required first. We have to reenable
this once this is resolved.

[1]: cross-rs/cross#613
[2]: cross-rs/cross#620
[3]: cross-rs/cross#609
bors bot added a commit to pitkley/in-container that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
32: fix: temporarily disable building and testing on FreeBSD r=pitkley a=pitkley

CI is currently failing due to [1] and [2], and they are not getting
merged upstream due to [3] being required first. We have to reenable
this once this is resolved.

[1]: cross-rs/cross#613
[2]: cross-rs/cross#620
[3]: cross-rs/cross#609

Co-authored-by: Pit Kleyersburg <[email protected]>
pitkley added a commit to pitkley/in-container that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
CI is currently failing due to [1] and [2], and they are not getting
merged upstream due to [3] being required first. We have to reenable
this once this is resolved.

[1]: cross-rs/cross#613
[2]: cross-rs/cross#620
[3]: cross-rs/cross#609
bors bot added a commit to pitkley/in-container that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
32: fix: temporarily disable building and testing on FreeBSD r=pitkley a=pitkley

CI is currently failing due to [1] and [2], and they are not getting
merged upstream due to [3] being required first. We have to reenable
this once this is resolved.

[1]: cross-rs/cross#613
[2]: cross-rs/cross#620
[3]: cross-rs/cross#609

Co-authored-by: Pit Kleyersburg <[email protected]>
pitkley added a commit to pitkley/in-container that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
CI is currently failing due to [1] and [2], and they are not getting
merged upstream due to [3] being required first. We have to reenable
this once this is resolved.

[1]: cross-rs/cross#613
[2]: cross-rs/cross#620
[3]: cross-rs/cross#609
bors bot added a commit to pitkley/in-container that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
32: fix: temporarily disable building and testing on FreeBSD r=pitkley a=pitkley

CI is currently failing due to [1] and [2], and they are not getting
merged upstream due to [3] being required first. We have to reenable
this once this is resolved.

[1]: cross-rs/cross#613
[2]: cross-rs/cross#620
[3]: cross-rs/cross#609

Co-authored-by: Pit Kleyersburg <[email protected]>
svenstaro added a commit to svenstaro/cross that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2022
svenstaro added a commit to svenstaro/miniserve that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2022
We're currently waiting on cross-rs/cross#613 and cross-rs/cross#620
to be merged and released for cross. Until then, we're fixing this ourselves downstream with a custom FreeBSD image.
svenstaro added a commit to svenstaro/miniserve that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2022
We're currently waiting on cross-rs/cross#613 and cross-rs/cross#620
to be merged and released for cross. Until then, we're fixing this ourselves downstream with a custom FreeBSD image.
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

included in #609

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants