feat(query): implement ST_ASGEOJSON

[kkk25641463]

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

feat: Implement ST_ASGEOJSON().
see alse doc.

Tests

• Unit Test
• Logic Test
• Benchmark Test
• No Test - Explain why

Type of change

• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
• Documentation Update
• Refactoring
• Performance Improvement
• Other (please describe):

---

This change is 

[drmingdrmer]

Add a new version and corresponding test if protobuf message format changed:

    // Dear developer:
    //      If you're gonna add a new metadata version, you'll have to add a test for it.
    //      You could just copy an existing test file(e.g., `../tests/it/v024_table_meta.rs`)
    //      and replace two of the variable `bytes` and `want`.

https://github.com/drmingdrmer/databend/blob/f9d2b79400bf5939bd5308451470c62bb917db9d/src/meta/proto-conv/src/util.rs#L120

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 0 of 35 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @b41sh)

[kkk25641463]

Add a new version and corresponding test if protobuf message format changed:

    // Dear developer:
    //      If you're gonna add a new metadata version, you'll have to add a test for it.
    //      You could just copy an existing test file(e.g., `../tests/it/v024_table_meta.rs`)
    //      and replace two of the variable `bytes` and `want`.

https://github.com/drmingdrmer/databend/blob/f9d2b79400bf5939bd5308451470c62bb917db9d/src/meta/proto-conv/src/util.rs#L120

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 0 of 35 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @b41sh)

OK, i will add it later!

[drmingdrmer]

The protobuf and meta part is great to me

Reviewed 9 of 34 files at r2, 2 of 8 files at r3, 3 of 5 files at r4.
Reviewable status: 14 of 38 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @b41sh)

[b41sh]

LGTM, thanks for your great contribution. @kkk25641463