-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 761
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[deps] bump prost & tonic #1616
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Chojan Shang <[email protected]>
Thanks for the contribution! Please review the labels and make any necessary changes. |
Hello @PsiACE, 🎉 Thank you for opening the pull request! 🎉 |
This PR is ready. Of course we can also wait for arrow2. |
common/arrow/Cargo.toml
Outdated
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ simd = ["arrow/simd"] | |||
# Workspace dependencies | |||
|
|||
# Github dependencies | |||
arrow = { package = "arrow2", git="https://github.com/datafuse-extras/arrow2", rev = "43c101f" } | |||
arrow-flight = { git="https://github.com/datafuse-extras/arrow2", rev = "43c101f" } | |||
arrow = { package = "arrow2", git="https://github.com/psiace/arrow2", rev = "5187d3d" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😎, why not using the datafuse-extra branch here?
What's the difference between them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that I still need to solve the problem of arrow2 integration test, although it can already be used in our project :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, how about wait the arrow2 merged or patch it to the datafuse-extra/arrow2?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Later, maybe 20 minutes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!.
But these deps do not affect a lot of the codes I am familiar with.
So, leave the final approve to somebody else.
metadata.insert_bin(AUTH_TOKEN_KEY, MetadataValue::from_bytes(&token)); | ||
Ok(req) | ||
}) | ||
FlightServiceClient::with_interceptor(channel, AuthInterceptor { token }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's nice~
Signed-off-by: Chojan Shang <[email protected]>
Once merged, we can enable |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thank you @PsiACE
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1616 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 73% 73%
======================================
Files 540 540
Lines 33465 33468 +3
======================================
+ Hits 24436 24444 +8
+ Misses 9029 9024 -5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
CI Passed |
Signed-off-by: Chojan Shang [email protected]
I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://datafuse.rs/policies/cla/
Summary
Changelog
Related Issues
Fixes #1090 #1027
Test Plan
Unit Tests
Stateless Tests