Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc(scheduling): make it easier to find ui ingestion #4610

Conversation

anshbansal
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2022

Unit Test Results (build & test)

  96 files  +  95    96 suites  +95   13m 12s ⏱️ + 6m 20s
689 tests +612  630 ✔️ +560  59 💤 +52  0 ±0 

Results for commit 654cdb6. ± Comparison against base commit 61a95f4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ module.exports = {
"metadata-ingestion/schedule_docs/intro",
"metadata-ingestion/schedule_docs/cron",
"metadata-ingestion/schedule_docs/airflow",
"docs/ui-ingestion",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it really make sense to put UI ingestion under "Scheduling"? We might want an intermediary page saying "Scheduling with DataHub" instead of this quick thing.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was trying to avoid that because did not want to maintain two different page. Added a very simple page that points to UI based ingestion.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2022

Unit Test Results (metadata ingestion)

       5 files  ±0         5 suites  ±0   54m 4s ⏱️ - 7m 6s
   396 tests ±0     396 ✔️ ±  0    0 💤 ±  0  0 ±0 
1 911 runs  ±0  1 847 ✔️  - 20  64 💤 +20  0 ±0 

Results for commit 654cdb6. ± Comparison against base commit 61a95f4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@anshbansal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Lint failure is unrelated. Raised a separate PR for fixing the lint failure in #4621

@jjoyce0510 jjoyce0510 merged commit aa0fe36 into datahub-project:master Apr 8, 2022
@anshbansal anshbansal deleted the add-ui-ingestion-under-scheduling branch April 8, 2022 17:53
maggiehays pushed a commit to maggiehays/datahub that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants