Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(datahub-client): avoid parallel execution of metadat-io:test #4685

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2022

Conversation

MugdhaHardikar-GSLab
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

This fix will prevent running metadata-io:test and metadata-integration:java:datahub-clinet:test. This is supposed to fix the issue of datahub-client test failing intermittently

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 18, 2022

Unit Test Results (build & test)

  96 files  ±0    96 suites  ±0   18m 28s ⏱️ - 6m 7s
689 tests ±0  630 ✔️ ±0  59 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 2878baa. ± Comparison against base commit 15474cd.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jjoyce0510 jjoyce0510 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks Mugdha!

@jjoyce0510 jjoyce0510 merged commit 9ecb785 into datahub-project:master Apr 18, 2022
@MugdhaHardikar-GSLab MugdhaHardikar-GSLab deleted the client-test branch July 12, 2022 05:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants