feat(glossary) Display Incoming 'IsA' Glossary related entities #5063
Conversation
|
Just want to take the opportunity to clarify, to add relatedTerms to a term, we would still need to do ingestion via backend right? There is no way/plans to add via UI? |
@xiphl that is correct - for now! We recognize that that is desired and is scheduled as a followup to happen soon. So you should be able to Add/Delete Contains/Inherits relationships via the UI. |
This is highly needed from my side. Looking forward to it so i could let my data stewards work with business glossary independently and effectively via UI. Hope it will arrive soon! |
| @@ -28,6 +28,19 @@ query getGlossaryTerm($urn: String!, $start: Int, $count: Int) { | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| childTerms: relationships(input: { types: ["IsA"], direction: INCOMING, start: $start, count: $count }) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor: This field may be confusing because there are technically both "IsA" and "HasA" children terms from this one.
Would it be clearer to say
isAChildren?
or
hasAChildren?
Just curious to hear your thoughts. We are also okay to do this as a followup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah that makes sense - I think isAChildren for this case is pretty understandable and clear - will make a quick change and push up
chriscollins3456
force-pushed
the
cc--glossary-related-entities
branch
from
d9f5ae1 to
243e617
Compare
|
Will merge once CI passes. |
…hub-project#5063) * feat(glossary) Display Incoming 'IsA' Glossary related entities * update name of field Co-authored-by: Chris Collins <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chris Collins <[email protected]>
Now displays related entities that are related to any Incoming "IsA" glossary terms on a parent term's related entities tab.
For example:
TermA inherits from TermB (TermA has an Outgoing "IsA" relationship defined with TermA) and therefore shows TermA in its Inherits tab. If you go to TermB's profile, you will see all entities related to TermA in TermB's Related Entities tab.
The way the the Related Terms tab works, though, is that we only show Outgoing "IsA" and "HasA" relationships (Inherits and Contains, respectively). So TermB may not show TermA in its Related Terms tab.
Note: This is only 1 level down, so we only show direct Incoming "IsA" relationship children's related entities (much easier and quicker to implement than going all the way through the tree)
A visual example -
Container Termhas two Incoming "IsA" relationships withChild Termand2nd Child Termand therefore will show all of their related entities in its own tab as well as its own.Checklist