-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ingest): add ingest --no-progress
option
#9300
feat(ingest): add ingest --no-progress
option
#9300
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the overall premise here - those messages can be annoyingly chatty at times
My main worry is the flag's naming. In most CLIs, --quiet
suppresses all log messages and is effectively the inverse of --verbose
.
Can we rename quiet to --no-progress
or --no-print-progress
to more accurately reflect what it does?
Hello, @hsheth2, thanks for your comment :) I agree that your worry about expression |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
--no-progress
option
Thank you for taking care of this PR, @hsheth2. Please, schedule the PR can be merged 🙏 |
Checklist
Hello, guys. I want to silent intermediate ingestion report.
When, I ingest data from Databricks or Redshift platform, it takes more than 30 minutes, and it generates large log files (ex. 11 Mb). I want to avoid this situation, as it slows down our logging platform.
I added
--quiet
,-q
option on ingest-cli, before the--dry-run
, but please let me know that it's order should be changed.