Improve formatting of fields/alternatives #1609
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If a record field is a `Some` or a completion (or both), this formats them on the same line as the key to improve the compactness of the formatted output. Note that this change applies to record types and union types, too, but in practice we only expect to see `Some` and record completions in record fields.
sjakobi
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If a record field is a
Someor a completion (or both), this formats themon the same line as the key to improve the compactness of the formatted
output.
Note that this change applies to record types and union types, too, but in
practice we only expect to see
Someand record completions in record fields.