Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

goto_analyzer_parse_optionst is not a messaget #4517

Conversation

romainbrenguier
Copy link
Member

This class already inherits a log field referencing the same thing.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • [na] Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • [na] The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • [na] My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • [na] White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

This class already inherits a log field referencing the same thing.
@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier force-pushed the clean-up/goto-analyzer-messaget branch from 4561bc1 to 27baa38 Compare April 11, 2019 13:51
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 27baa38).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/107978432

@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier merged commit eed359b into diffblue:develop Apr 11, 2019
@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier deleted the clean-up/goto-analyzer-messaget branch April 11, 2019 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants